So I'm working on a story based on a binary system involving two Earth sized, Earth like worlds with very eccentric orbits. In the story, one of the major coastal cities is protected by a massive retractable seawall to protect it from a titanic tidal wave (known as the Leviathan) which occurs as the two worlds swing past each other at periapsis. But after a terror attack disables the seawall from deploying, the Leviathan literally wipes away any trace that the city was there; carrying away what ever debris it made and leaving only the concrete foundations and empty streets in its wake.

If you need details about the orbit, the two planets are roughly the diameter of the Moon's orbit apart at apoapsis, and only about 20,000 km apart at periapsis. One planet, named Horizon is 93% the Earth's diameter, and the other is 89%; with both having roughly the same density as the Earth. So, could the Leviathan exist; and if it did, how big would such a tidal wave be?

  • $\begingroup$ How did the city exist at all before such walls were possible? Why put it there? $\endgroup$ – JDługosz Jul 17 '16 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ The city is built around the mouth of a major river into one of the planet's continents. Since it is a colony world that we found years from now, the sea wall was built well before the port city was set up. $\endgroup$ – Mattias Jul 17 '16 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ You ought to note that in the question. So, why build a city therewhen it requires such accomidation and becomes a single point of failure? $\endgroup$ – JDługosz Jul 17 '16 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ Because it was designed with multiple backups to make sure it didn't fail. But, since it was a strategic Terror attack, all of these failed at once. Plus, since it is a very strategic point logistically, the risk was worth it. $\endgroup$ – Mattias Jul 17 '16 at 19:30

First thing I thought to do was to work out the orbital period. That is simple enough given Kepler's laws, and it comes to just over 9 Earth days.

Then I found a neat calculator for the magnitude of the Tidal force over the planets: http://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1360312100

Putting in your planets' data, with an eccentricity of 0.9 gives a tidal force at periapsis of about $2\times10^{24}$, or more than 10000 times greater that the force at apoapsis.

So it looks like you're going to get some big waves.

Gravity from a planet that is 20000km away is pretty strong, about 1/10 of surface gravity. That could have some pretty major effects, when you consider that lunar gravity is only about one nine-millionth of the Earth's gravity at the earth's surface.

The tidal bulge on Earth is about 0.3m (that's how big the tides would be if there were no land to focus them. We can work this out using

$${a_\mathrm{earth} \over a_\mathrm{earth\ and\ moon} } = {r^2_\mathrm{tide}\over r^2_\mathrm{no\ tide}}$$

where $a$ is the acceleration due to gravity, and $r$ is the radius. (see http://mb-soft.com/public/tides.html) The acceleration due to gravity as the second planet passes overhead will decrease from about 10m/s/s to 9 m/s/s, so the left fraction is about 1.1 The radius of the planet must increase by 1.05 due to the tide. If the planet has a radius 6000km the tidal radius is 300km larger......

300km tides every 9 days. Oh dear.

What does this mean? There won't be enough water to keep the planets in an equilibrium at periapsis, therefore the rocks of the planet will be strongly deformed, and heated, probably melting the crust, perhaps causing the planets to start to rip each other apart.

You can have a big tide, but you don't need the planets to approach each other so close.

To achieve something devastating enough set r_tide to (say) 6001 and r to 6000, giving a ratio of 1.000333. We want to have set the moon far enough away that it changes the force of gravity by a factor of 1.000333.

At a distance of x radii, the acceleration is $1/x^2$ so $\frac{1}{1-1/x^2} = 1.000333, giving x=55. Since one radius is about 6000km, the closest approach of about 300000 km seems reasonable.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Given the planets are not far outside their mutual Roche limits, deformation and heating seems rather probable. This will presumably cause the planets to recede from each other rather quickly. $\endgroup$ – John Dallman Jul 17 '16 at 22:11
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I don't think these orbits will be stable in the medium to long term. This isn't a major problem for the situation. You can tweak the separation at periapsis to give 10m tides (which then might be magnified to 50m tides close to land). The orbits probably still aren't stable in the long term but that is probably easier to hand wave away. $\endgroup$ – James K Jul 18 '16 at 12:56
  • $\begingroup$ Holy crap, a 300km wave?! That's higher than the Karman Line!! I was only hoping something around 4km. Ok, maybe I should adjust the orbit a bit. I gave it a low periapsis because I wanted Dawn to take up a huge portion of the sky from Horizon's surface (like what you would see in sci-fi art). How can I adjust the orbit so it would still have that view at periapsis without creating a wave that was large enough to take out satellites? $\endgroup$ – Mattias Aug 16 '16 at 0:53

You can make the rise as large as you need via geographic considerations, and not depend on the rough bulge height. Aswith our own planet, with continants in the way we don’t have a raised bulge that follows the moon as the planet turns. We have gyers in each basin that sloshes around and is pumped by the tidal force if the frequency matches.

Meanwhile, a bore of rising water can be funneled through a canyon. A desirable protected harbor may be at the end of such a high-walled canyon, as inspired by Pearl Harbor


This also gives you some flexibility. Instead of the tidal wave occuring every few days with the approach of the worlds, the effect can vary with the exact timing of the approach and the time of day and the position of the gyre. It only sends a bore angled to go down the throat, with various strengths, on rare alignments of all the factors.

So you may have a bore, say, every 24th pass, or every 6 months; but some are modest and occasionally more severe. (The sun affects the tides too, offering another slower factor; in addition to just needing more exact timing).

Note : same distance as moon, but nearly double the mass. See here and back of the envelope calculation sets all values to 1 and sum of mass changes from 1 to 2; so period changes from 1 to ¼ or about a week.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.