Other posts from this thread will be posted here as these are updated:
Info
Part 1, (Fire) focuses on what the fire elementals can do.
There are 200 such beings that exist (and have existed for a long time.)
Now, at the beginning of this situation, each being has a starting amount of $6.997 \times 10^{13}$ Joules (J) of heat energy in their natural state. They can also absorb heat energy, indirectly or directly (they can absorb it without touching it), up to a capacity of $4\times 10^{15} \text{J}$. "Capacity" is the maximum amount of energy (in Joules) they can store. Each elemental emits, at rest, as much heat as a human. They can use this energy--up to their capacity--any way they want, transferring it in any way they like. They can absorb or emit heat at a rate of 4184 KWatts (4184 KiloJoules/second), based off of the calorie unit.
They can exponentially absorb heat energy by, say, using a spark to set something on fire, then absorbing all the heat from that, to exponentially grow (up to their limit). They can naturally absorb heat energy by pulling heat from anything around them (while giving them lots of heat, it also chills/freezes whatever they drew from since they are taking its heat.
While they do have immensely destructive powers, they will not use them to coerce/threaten anyone politicians or millionaires included (Meaning no resources, no funding, no backup.) The rest of the world is currently in semi-denial that the planet is warming, and politicians are split on the topic.
The setting is modern, 2018 level pollution+technology.
Taking into account these limitations and abilities:
- They can travel at the speed of sound and do not tire
- Work 24/7
- Can only use their fire manipulation and heat manipulation powers (shaping, directing, transferring, absorbing, and emitting heat or fire)
- Cannot manipulate matter on a fundamental level (unless by using heat/fire.)
- Can manipulate plasma
- Can interact with people (but they have no other helpers)
- Can touch/manipulate things that are not burning
- Can touch things without heating them (can hold ice/carry wood without setting it on fire)
- Can cool things by absorbing their heat, but can only absorb to their capacity
- Cannot directly cool large bodies of water, or the earth or air
- Each burn air at a rate of 1 lb/hr
- Can be submerged in small bodies of water (pools, small streams, ponds) without getting hurt, but cannot submerge in rivers, lakes, oceans/seas (either running water or large bodies of water) due to the harmful effect of the water magic residing there
- Cannot travel through earth
- They have no resources, funding, or backup
- They can shapeshift (but are still made of fire.) They can reach a size of up to 10 meters in diameter and a height of up to 30 meters (the taller they get, the skinnier). Shapeshifting costs no energy.
- They can fly, but they have the oxygen needs of a human (no going to space)
- They are immortal
Question
Using these fire powers, how could global warming be averted/slowed?
Answer Must Be:
- canonical
- explanatory
And solutions must
- Be fast (2 year time limit for effects to occur)
- Be useful for cleaning the biosphere/atmosphere
- Use the heat conduction/fire abilities
- Not be very noticeable to the human population (no, e.g, giant flares/blacking out the sky)
- Not harm the environment at all. No polluting air/water/earth heavily. No upset to the natural order or food webs/chains. No killing. No damage to anything.
Thank you to the Sandbox for helping me develop this question
Potential Close-voters
According to the help center, "Effects of events or world elements, including biology, technology and magic, on specific aspects of that world's societies, cultures, and environment" and "How to achieve a specified effect in a defined world, including by the use of biology, technology or magic, while maintaining in-universe consistency" are on-topic (not story-based).
The help center also encourages that questions "inspire answers explain[ing] "why" and "how." I've worked on keeping this narrow and adding restrictions as needed to make it less and less primarily opinion-based. If you do have an issue with the broadness or subjectiveness of this question, please leave a constructive and explanatory comment so that I can work on fixing this.
Edit Note to Those Concerned or Moderators:
While three answers to this have been deleted, I did not intentionally edit this to invalidate them. One was self-deleted before an edit that would have invalidated it, one was self-deleted after an unintentional edit that partially invalidated it, and one was self-deleted after a discussion in the comments about a loose interpretation of a rule, which was followed by a further constructive edit.