How do human girls who are sterilised at age 9 develop as they mature?

Question

On the world of Ruquelis, there are three genders, men, women, and lilim who are a female sex, with wings and clawed feet. Because of the genetics of this situation, lilim are less fertile and can give birth to all three genders, while women are more fertile, and can give birth only to men and women.

This has led to wars and atrocious behavior toward women that has been perpetuated by the presence of reincarnation anchors. Because woman and lilim children are not distinguishable before the age of 9, by which time all lilim-children have begun to transform into lilim, while no woman-child displays these signs (except for the occasional exception who begins later, but they're not spoken of), 9 is the age at which a female child who is not visibly becoming a lilim legally becomes a woman.

In the Empire of Qlaemythu, 9 year old woman-children may be sterilized by bilateral oophorectomy if they are judged to be sufficiently valuable. The others... have a much worse fate that isn't relevant to this question.

There is no hormone replacement therapy available for these sterilized young women.

My question is: How would these sterilized young women differ from an unsterilized woman in her physical and mental development? What would they be like at adulthood?

I can speculate what they would be like, but I'm looking for scientific resources that show the consequences of such an act. Because sterilising a 9-year-old girl in this way rarely appears to be done in our own society, I haven't been able to find the information I need online. Perhaps my google-fu is weak... or perhaps there really is nothing online.

EDIT:

Since it has been pointed out in comments that all of these people would be a different species to Homo sapiens, here are the genetics that disprove that statement:

There are chromosomes X and Y, which are the normal, human sex chromosomes. There is also a L chromosome, which carries the genes to make a lilim a lilim. This is the only artificial addition that I have made.

We therefore have crosses:

Men (XY) and Women (XX) -> ½ XY and ½ XX.

This corresponds to our familiar 50% male/female sex ratios in unions between men and women.

However, we also have:

Men (XY) and Lilim (LX) -> ¼ XL, ¼ XX, ¼ YL and ¼ XY.

In these crosses, YL is immediately lethal, as the L chromosome is missing genes necessary for survival of a zygote that is only present on the X chromosome, preventing even a single round of cell division.

This leads to lilim effectively having a birth ratio of 1/3 XY Men, 1/3 XX Women and 1/3 XL Lilim, with a slightly lower birth rate than is the case for women.

Since this question is about sterilised fully human XX females, the statement that these women are not human is disproved.

Answer 1

They Would Look Unusual

The best bet for an approximate equivalence here would be Estrogen Insensitivity Syndrome.

The default body plan is female, and initial development (including uterine development) would be normal because the gonads would be present until age 9 (when puberty could well have already kicked off, depending on a variety of environmental factors including nutrition).

Mental development (provided that the surgery was done humanely and didn't induce PTSD in the victims) should be pretty standard with an important caveat; as outlined extensively in Testosterone Rex by Cordelia Fine, sex hormones have surprisingly little bearing on the way the brain develops after adolescence. Without elevated estrogen and testosterone, though, it is a reasonable supposition that these victims' sex drive will be far reduced from what it might have been.

The caveat, however, is that without the surge in estrogen and testosterone, victims of this surgery would experience a failed puberty. No growth spurt, no secondary sexual characteristic development. In the recorded cases of EIS, the sufferers still developed pubic hair, but this could have been a result of testosterone, since the hormones were still being produced, just not having an effect.

So they would look underdeveloped for whatever age they actually were - their organs would be ageing but wouldn't look fully adult for some time (possibly ever, as typically delayed puberty isn't allowed to linger indefinitely in modern cases, and concomitant pathologies make separating out just the absence of sex hormones difficult in most syndromes that have that effect). They would be shorter than their peers, they would likely moderately androgynous, and they would probably suffer from osteoporosis pretty early in their adult life, in the same fashion as it is much more likely to affect women after menopause.

(Also, it goes without saying that without progesterone and estrogen, the menstrual cycle will never start.)

Most of the mental characteristics connected to diagnoses of primary ovarian failure largely have to do with social stigmas and the loss of potential futures, not physiological symptoms. That said, unless there was a very strong social system that could help the victims of this barbaric practice, it's hard to imagine the combination of physical oddity and the sense of being a by-blow of the empire's barbaric practices not doing a number on their mental well-being.

---

Addendum: The onset of puberty in the United States (as an example) for females ranges between 8-13 years. By age 9, it would not be unusual for a fair number of the victims of this surgery to have already started puberty and received the first boosts of hormones speeding development, which would throw all the previous estimates clean out the window, since you'd be combining the sudden cessation of those hormones with the trauma of a surgery.

As many as 1 in 5000 children experience precocious puberty, which for female children means the onset of menses before age 9. If there's a sufficient population of these victims, that brings the odds to a near-certainty that at least a few would go through this extra roll of the dice.