Without knowing the rules of time travel in your world...
The unfortunate truth about time travel is that, insofar as we know, it can't happen. That means we're inventing an idea, but we're missing the rules of your world that are the foundation for the idea. (Normally we'd vote to close a question that doesn't have all the details, but this is your first question.)
One of the bigger problems is that @Trioxidane is correct, the Earth rotates and orbits. The solar system itself also orbits. That means that if you don't account for both spatial and temporal conditions, there's nothing on the receiving end but empty space. But if you think about it... that's boring (unless you're writing a story that explores that specific facet of time travel).
Another big problem is that it's "reasonably well understood" (*cough*) how to travel forward in time — you just travel as close as you can to the speed of light. When you get to your destination, time will have moved for them faster than for you. But backwards doesn't work that way — or in any way that we can "factually hypothesize."
So, without your world's rules for time travel we don't know how to resolve paradoxes or inconsistencies. For example, we could answer your question by suggesting the discovery of a tachyonic particle that would allow for communication across time. Your receiver is built to detect such signals — but then what? If it never detects a signal, did the future find that the discovery actually didn't work as advertised? Or does the future use a modulation that the past isn't demodulating? Or maybe the future simply doesn't have anything to say to the past? The fact that the solution worked using a fictional particle of matter is another form of black-boxing the solution or saying "magic happens here."
If we act without knowing any of your world's time travel rules, then perhaps the only sensible design is to internationally allocate an EM frequency that's reserved for time-traveling communication — and then hope that the unbelievers don't mess with the signal. After all, other than telling you what will happen in your near-future, how could you prove that a signal had traversed time? (And that's assuming the future doesn't have what Star Trek calls a "temporal prime directive," which means we're back to you not getting a signal).
And this assumes that the future hasn't found a way to manipulate communications in the past, meaning the "receiver" is nothing more than your cell phone.
Finally, let me point out that it might not even be in your best interest to look too closely at how to implement your receiver.1, 2 Such a receiver is, from a practical perspective, Clarkean magic. And it usually causes more problems to explain the magic than it does to simply accept it exists and move on with your story (in which case, the receiver is nothing more than the manifestation of your worldbuilding rule that communication across time is possible in your world). This idea is reflected in the movie "Frequency" where regular ham radios are used to communicate through time thanks to an undefined quirk of nature. (Or you could use the solution used in the movie "Primer," which is quite literally, "magic happens here." The time-traveling component of the story isn't explained at all... it just exists.)
Having said all that, we could provide better answers, but it would help to know the rules of time travel in your world. Thanks!