Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 6, 2022 at 17:00 history edited Joachim CC BY-SA 4.0
improved phrasing
Sep 6, 2022 at 16:30 answer added Brianorca timeline score: 0
Sep 6, 2022 at 16:13 answer added komodosp timeline score: 0
Sep 6, 2022 at 14:36 comment added Pelinore We already added colour more than half a century ago, so the only other thing left to make photographs more representative of reality than it currently is would be by going 3D, we have probably been able to do 3D photos longer than we've been able to do colour ones but we don't so obviously there is no interest in them and thus is more than marginally unlikely that we will start doing it now .. conclusion: there will be no change, a photo is a photo and is far more likely than not going to stay that way.
Sep 6, 2022 at 13:21 answer added Tony Tidswell timeline score: 0
Apr 13, 2017 at 5:52 vote accept Gstestso
Feb 24, 2017 at 3:03 review Close votes
Feb 24, 2017 at 7:29
Feb 20, 2017 at 0:58 answer added N2ition timeline score: 0
Feb 19, 2017 at 13:56 answer added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე timeline score: 2
Feb 19, 2017 at 13:19 comment added Greg We already have camera's with a 3d 'depth field'. I imagine these will be available on an iPhone type device in 30 years.
Feb 19, 2017 at 7:07 answer added Durakken timeline score: 0
Feb 18, 2017 at 15:19 answer added cybernard timeline score: 1
Feb 18, 2017 at 14:33 comment added chepner "Becoming" popular?
Feb 18, 2017 at 5:39 comment added user458 Photographs tend to lose color as they age. Often, corners will get bent or torn due to mishandling. Especially egregious mishandling can lead to smudges from finger prints and even the total dissolving to the chemical material that makes up the color from the paper holding it. Occasionally, photographs suffer water, heat, or animal pest damage due to poor storage conditions. Rare circumstances sometimes cause photographs to adhere to the glass of the frame containing them, leading to severe damage if you attempt removal. Oh, you meant picture technology specs. Sorry. [/troll]
Feb 18, 2017 at 0:08 comment added Nolonar I think in 30 years, devices like the HoloLens could be a thing. With it, you could essentially watch your photos on any Surface you want. Your walls, or even your Windows (puns intended).
Feb 17, 2017 at 21:13 answer added Loren Pechtel timeline score: 5
Feb 17, 2017 at 17:15 answer added Miguel Bartelsman timeline score: 13
Feb 17, 2017 at 16:58 answer added Werrf timeline score: 4
Feb 17, 2017 at 16:40 answer added ponies timeline score: 5
Feb 17, 2017 at 15:15 answer added r41n timeline score: 5
Feb 17, 2017 at 13:13 answer added Mindwin Remember Monica timeline score: 2
Feb 17, 2017 at 12:58 comment added Mindwin Remember Monica This question is on topic. IMHO
Feb 17, 2017 at 11:49 comment added Goufalite "It's a HDTV, it's got higher resolution than the real world!" - Futurama
Feb 17, 2017 at 10:59 comment added user Film resolution and light sensitivity has also increased over time. Glass plate photographers of a century ago would have been overjoyed having access to what we would in recent years consider "slow" (low ISO) film. Same for film with the light sensitivity of high-ISO film. Digital photography doesn't really change any of that; all it really changes is the recording medium.
Feb 17, 2017 at 10:53 history edited user
edited tags
Feb 17, 2017 at 10:30 answer added Stig Hemmer timeline score: 13
Feb 17, 2017 at 7:31 answer added Cem Kalyoncu timeline score: 29
Feb 17, 2017 at 6:14 answer added L.Dutch timeline score: 3
Feb 17, 2017 at 5:58 review Close votes
Feb 17, 2017 at 12:58
Feb 17, 2017 at 5:45 answer added JDługosz timeline score: 19
Feb 17, 2017 at 5:26 history asked Gstestso CC BY-SA 3.0