Timeline for Is it feasible for an organism to feed off cosmic radiation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jan 21, 2017 at 22:44 | history | edited | Garto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:33 | comment | added | AngelPray | Using what other forms of radiation? There are no cosmic ray by-products that aren't used by earth life. That would just be a waste. | |
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:26 | history | edited | JDługosz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:19 | comment | added | pablodf76 | No, actually I'm describing an alternative to it, using other forms of radiation, that could work either on Earth or on a different planet even if there were no sun nearby. | |
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:18 | history | edited | Garto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:15 | comment | added | Garto | @pablodf76 But that's nothing new whatsoever. Humans skin absorbs UVB from the sun which produces Vitamin D. Plants use energy from the sun for photosynthesis. You said it yourself, the energy splits water molecules. You're describing Earth ecology. | |
Jan 21, 2017 at 20:50 | comment | added | pablodf76 | I understand that cosmic rays can be too strong, which is why I also asked about their subproducts (i. e. the secondary particles and radiation that they give off when they collide with the atmosphere). These an organism could use while staying inside the atmosphere. If energy could be extracted from them, an autotroph could use it to split useful molecules and build tissues. I haven't worked out that, since I wanted to check the basic point first. | |
Jan 21, 2017 at 20:40 | history | answered | Garto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |