Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
Jan 22, 2017 at 17:35 vote accept pablodf76
Jan 22, 2017 at 9:49 comment added user6760 At flux of 1 per sq km per year (btw solar energy is around 10 to the power of 20 at least depends on set up) I think ur creature spend their entire life in hibernation...
Jan 22, 2017 at 0:05 answer added LSerni timeline score: 5
Jan 21, 2017 at 22:55 comment added pablodf76 @Zxyrra I'd prefer if it evolved naturally. But in fact I'd consider the possibility of little or no sunlight to begin with (think a rogue planet or something like Planet Nine, way out from the Sun).
Jan 21, 2017 at 22:47 comment added Zxyrra Does the organism need to evolve, or can it have been designed in a lab and then put into place? It may not evolve to feed off of cosmic radiation when there's regular sunlight but it's possible that an engineered organism could make use of it
Jan 21, 2017 at 22:03 comment added pablodf76 @Karl I guess that must be so, but do you have figures on that? On Wikipedia it says that "cosmic ray energy density averages ~1 eV/cm³" (which is indeed minute), yet it also says that Earth gets ~10⁴ particles of avg 10⁹ GeV per second per square meter (and presumably many more at lower energies). Am I missing something?
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:40 comment added Karl The overall energy flux of cosmic radiation is minute, while the energy of a single "cosmic rays" is far too big to be useable by any chemical process.
Jan 21, 2017 at 21:31 answer added JDługosz timeline score: 0
Jan 21, 2017 at 20:57 history edited pablodf76 CC BY-SA 3.0
Link to more-or-less related post http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/36534/no-sunlight-just-high-energy-radiation
Jan 21, 2017 at 20:40 answer added Garto timeline score: 0
Jan 21, 2017 at 20:05 history asked pablodf76 CC BY-SA 3.0