Skip to main content
27 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/ with https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/
Jul 4, 2016 at 9:18 comment added nigel222 The planet will need to be warmer than today's Earth. Here, a continent at both poles has led to runaway glaciation "snowball Earth". Warmer implies that only the polar regions will be habitable by human beings, if that features in your story. (Earth herself was like this for most of the history of life, which is why we should greatly fear global warming).
Jul 3, 2016 at 4:05 answer added Francisco timeline score: 0
S Mar 27, 2016 at 8:45 history bounty ended dot_Sp0T
S Mar 27, 2016 at 8:45 history notice removed dot_Sp0T
Mar 26, 2016 at 16:18 answer added JDługosz timeline score: 1
Mar 26, 2016 at 16:05 comment added JDługosz Right; nature eventually came up with grass. Humans turned it into grain including maize (corn), wheat, and rice. There is no "wild grain" close to it in form like wolves are clearly dogs; grain as a thing at all is not "natural".
Mar 26, 2016 at 15:58 comment added dot_Sp0T @JDługosz no matter that to domesticate something you need an undomesticated version of it anyways, right?
Mar 26, 2016 at 15:55 comment added JDługosz Domesticated species in general would not exist without intelligent natives, regardless of the isolated contenents.
Mar 26, 2016 at 9:09 comment added dot_Sp0T @JDługosz because I didn't know any better word back then; regarding it now I guess grains/crops would fit the bill better
Mar 26, 2016 at 6:17 comment added JDługosz You would not have wheat. That doesn't have characteristics that would compete in a natural environment; it's a "freak" created by humans and exists only through our agriculture. Why did you mention wheat specifically anyway?
S Mar 26, 2016 at 3:10 history suggested Aarthew III CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified the moons
Mar 26, 2016 at 2:54 review Suggested edits
S Mar 26, 2016 at 3:10
S Mar 25, 2016 at 23:59 history bounty started dot_Sp0T
S Mar 25, 2016 at 23:59 history notice added dot_Sp0T Reward existing answer
Aug 5, 2015 at 14:49 vote accept dot_Sp0T
Jun 29, 2015 at 18:20 answer added WhatRoughBeast timeline score: 19
Jun 28, 2015 at 20:54 comment added WhatRoughBeast Outside the scope of the question. Of course, if you want to ask another question...
Jun 28, 2015 at 20:47 comment added dot_Sp0T @WhatRoughBeast please feel free to elaborate :)
Jun 28, 2015 at 20:43 comment added WhatRoughBeast Your moons are not in a configuration which is remotely stable.
Jun 28, 2015 at 17:19 history edited dot_Sp0T CC BY-SA 3.0
Addendum about humans
Jun 28, 2015 at 17:01 answer added Mikey timeline score: 1
Jun 28, 2015 at 16:45 comment added Mikey Okay, but animal activity has an enormous impact on the diversity of plant life, from transporting seeds to creating defensive mechanisms. I will attempt to answer the question, knowing this. A tiny example, if you have birds or people traveling between your two continents, you most certainly will have plants traveling between them.
Jun 28, 2015 at 10:46 comment added dot_Sp0T There will be animals naturally. But I didn't include any questions about animals for the sake of narrowing the question as best as possible. The question here is mostly about the plants fighting each other, e.g. the Americas and Australia have a very different plant-/animallife, not least due the fact of them being separated by what is basically half of the earth's watermasses
Jun 28, 2015 at 0:20 comment added Mikey Do you want to have any animals? If not, there will be far less diversity than what we see on Earth.
Jun 27, 2015 at 12:49 answer added bowlturner timeline score: 2
Jun 27, 2015 at 9:19 history asked dot_Sp0T CC BY-SA 3.0