Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 30, 2017 at 14:50 comment added wizzwizz4 @A.C.A.C. The trouble with that is that she would technically be your daughter, though birthed by your other daughter.
Dec 30, 2017 at 5:54 comment added L.Dutch @DLosc, right. fixed
Dec 30, 2017 at 5:54 history edited L.Dutch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 7 characters in body
Dec 30, 2017 at 0:36 comment added John Dvorak @ruakh The abdomen is the most likely place. Alas, it seems this has never actually been attempted, but don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
Dec 30, 2017 at 0:17 comment added ruakh @JohnDvorak: Where in the body?
Dec 29, 2017 at 23:57 comment added John Dvorak You can drop the first condition. Males don't have wombs per se, but they can still carry a baby in their bodies, provided somebody puts them in and takes them out. I can't quite remember what it does to the hormones, though.
Dec 29, 2017 at 18:23 comment added A. C. A. C. You don't even need to do the first half, just clone you and put the baby inside your daughter. Then her offspring will be your clone.
Dec 29, 2017 at 13:34 comment added JBH Dang, that was clever. I took "offspring" too literally.
Dec 29, 2017 at 11:04 comment added Lee Leon Likewise, if a child was conceived parthenogenetically. Very highly unlikely, because even if an egg was created with two sets of chromosomes, one set needs to be edited a little somehow for the ovum to be viable - of course transcription errors do happen and, I suppose, may be a genetic weakness or feature which might be inherited, so for the daughter to also conceive parthenogenetically more likely. This is essentially the same as your answer with the exception that yours is deliberate intervention and reasonably certain, whereas parthenogenesis is incredibly unlikely (near impossible).
Dec 29, 2017 at 8:01 history notice removed JDługosz
Dec 29, 2017 at 6:33 history notice added user Hard Science
Dec 29, 2017 at 6:27 history answered L.Dutch CC BY-SA 3.0