**Question 3:**

It's going to depend **hugely** on the jurisdiction.

In the UK, any officer using lethal force is (I believe) automatically suspended pending an independent investigation. We're very keen on "watching the watchmen", and ensuring that the police do not make routine use of lethal force.

So in the UK, someone with super-powers using lethal force will be looked on especially poorly – and it's not unlikely that they'd be kept away from anti-terror raids and the like, just to prevent the minefield that'd ensue should they kill someone. Or they might be used as a meat-shield but not allowed to hit people.

In the UK, the police rely on massive surveillance to make catching people easier.

It's quite possible that their powers would be particularly useful in non-lethal scenarios – catching suicide attempts, searching riverbeds, etc.

In the US, where police use of lethal force is more common, I'm sure they'd be treated differently.

So the simple answer is that **it'll depend entirely on the culture of the society / police force**. Imagine a similar issue – police force is offered indestructible, super-fast cars.

 - In the US, they'd be deployed continuously, as the US response to a car chase is to engage using many pursuers.
 - In the UK, they'd sit idle, as the UK response to a car chase is to leave them alone (reducing accidents), and put up a heli (can't be outrun by most cars), and then catch them safely when they stop or give up.