My question is not human-specific. I found this question that mentions that a brain have more neuronal complexity; I deduce it is more efficient (in terms of neural communication and energy use) to put all the higher complex mental functions in one large organ (tell me if I'm wrong, I'm not a biologist). But in an alien planet, where living carbon-based creatures have plenty of resources and food, could they evolve to have a series of interconnected small brains with the same functions of a large one? These brains could be located across one limb or across the back.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ They already do: cronodon.com/BioTech/insect_nervous_systems.html All invertebrates have just that. Central Nervous systems evolved because losing a limb was a lobotomy: inconvenient to say the least $\endgroup$ – nzaman Oct 26 '17 at 18:32
  • 20
    $\begingroup$ If it's rational, you can divide the large portion as many times as you want as long as the numerator and denominator are both integers and the denominator is non-zero. =) $\endgroup$ – corsiKa Oct 26 '17 at 23:24
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ In terms of "human" examples, you could consider conjoined twins - e.g. research more about how Abby and Brittany Hensel control their shared body, or how people who have undergone operations to separate the two hemispheres of their brain are affected. The proposed alien creature would probably be somewhere in between these. $\endgroup$ – Steve Oct 27 '17 at 12:30
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @corsiKa: Now I'm trying to imagine a creature with an irrational number of brains.. $\endgroup$ – Joe Bloggs Oct 27 '17 at 14:56
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @JoeBloggs That's easy - it's a root. $\endgroup$ – corsiKa Oct 27 '17 at 15:04


For large animals, octopuses are a possible source of inspiration. They have neurons in their arms, which lets them have a very large brain-to-body ratio. This does let their arms move without as much direct control from the brain.

You could also argue that this sort of structure can be found in leeches. They don't really have 32 brains, one inside each body segment, but they do have one ganglion per body segment, which in a sense exerts local control over that segment. Each ganglion cannot operate independently from the others - that is, it's not like there are 32 individual nervous systems working in unison.

Keep in mind that the segmented structure of the leech is what makes this sort of thing evolutionarily possible. You're probably not going to see this arise in animals like humans, for instance, because there's simply no need. A centralized organ is much simpler than miscellaneous localized ones.

  • 23
    $\begingroup$ Humans have specialized clusters of neurons around the heart, stomach and a few other spots which are part of the Autonomous Nervous System. They don't think on their own, but they do have independent control and monitoring functions. $\endgroup$ – nijineko Oct 27 '17 at 0:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's really no reason why it shouldn't be possible. It's all down to connections. As long as they are connected, the only real differences is distances (which may lead to increased signal delay, but that's pretty much it). $\endgroup$ – Clearer Oct 27 '17 at 8:32
  • $\begingroup$ @nijineko I didn't knew this, but these neuronal clusters aren't complex enough to have higher brain funtions like rational thiking. I read somewhere that the stegosaur could have a secondary neuronal cluster too. $\endgroup$ – Broken_Window Oct 28 '17 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Broken_Window You are quite correct - as far as modern science knows there are no "thinking" functions - those clusters are simply part of the ANS that monitor and control various organ function and report back to the brain. However, if you allow for a concept such as either evolution and/or genetic manipulation, then it certainly becomes theoretically possible. $\endgroup$ – nijineko Oct 28 '17 at 18:12

Sort of.

We kinda have that already with a brain split into three sections (left hemisphere, right hemisphere, cerebellum). But there is a lot of connection between those sections which will take up a lot of space, this gets exponentially worse if they are are spread apart. In our brain the connections are roughly a third as big as the parts it separates, so the more your spread it out the bigger the brain ends up being and the more resources it takes to maintain it. As it is our brain eats a third of all our calories, so making it bigger with no benefit is not likely to evolve.

Your biggest problem is the further apart they are the slower information travels between them, so your creatures will end up thinking slower and being less coordinated, worse if far from sense organs it also reacts slower which is pretty detrimental.

The closest you can come is to have a cerebellum like structure for each limb independently instead of one large one. (octopi are believed to function like this) but the thinking portion is still centralized.

  • $\begingroup$ Separating parts of the cerebellum would interfere with the coordinated movements of those 'limbs'. $\endgroup$ – amI Oct 26 '17 at 22:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ not necessarily in a meaningful way, the cerebellum already has to account for lag. $\endgroup$ – John Oct 26 '17 at 22:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The communication lag may actually be a driver for this sort of adaptation, rather than a problem. Similar to how humans have reflex circuits for quickly responding to certain stimuli, a large creature could have distributed decision making. $\endgroup$ – JDMc Oct 27 '17 at 23:41
  • $\begingroup$ I think you misunderstand coordination -- muscles are not absolute actuators; they require feedback. To coordinate two 'joints', you must look at the feedback from both. If this process is not central, you must send info from A to B and from B to A. If there are more than two joints, combinatrics will turn the creature into a mass of white matter (assuming it wants to play the violin ...). $\endgroup$ – amI Oct 31 '17 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ @amI that is what I was talking about when I said you end making the brain larger. $\endgroup$ – John Nov 1 '17 at 1:58

There is a being in a somewhat alien environment whose brain(s) have evolved precisely in that manner: the octopus.


They have a quite sizable set of neural tissue, with the largest brain to body mass ratio of all invertebrates. The organization of that neural tissue is also remarkable: about two thirds of the neural tissue are located outside the brain, in the tentacles; each tentacle has its own bundle of neurons, capable of doing some information processing and even sending commands to the muscles.

The central brain can command the tentacles if necessary, but they can also react on their own.

So, if it has already happened in our own planet, it's most certainly possible for it to happen to beings in a different planet. I'm not sure if this layout could eventually reach human levels of intelligence, but I don't see any reason why it couldn't, given the appropriate environment for the species to evolve a brain that large (if any biologist or neuroscientist wants to correct me on this, I'm all ears).


In Vernor Vinge's "A Fire Upon the Deep", there is a planet inhabited by dogs which operate in packs of about 5 apiece as an aggregate personality and intelligence, bound together by sonar communication. (They have ascended as far as medieval technology at the point of the story.) As members ("parts") are separated from the group ("person"), the group becomes less intelligent until eventually each single part has devolved to mere animal intelligence and behavior. When two or more "people" (i.e. packs) come into very close contact with each other they can become confused or otherwise lose their higher-order thinking ability due to the cross-talk of all their sonar. (This makes reproduction - and battle - a bit tricky). Streets are very wide so they can pass each other, and I assume rooms are very large as well if more than one is to perform any task in them at the same time. (They have five "hands" but each is less dexterous than one of ours, of course.) Swapping parts in or out of a "person" is avoided in all but the most extreme cases - such as after deadly skirmishes between enemy clans...

  • $\begingroup$ Great reference here! You should also mention how some of them swap out members in order to change their personalities ("soul surgery")... ;D $\endgroup$ – akaioi Oct 27 '17 at 1:41
  • $\begingroup$ I was trying to avoid spoilers. ;) $\endgroup$ – X Goodrich Oct 28 '17 at 7:15
  • $\begingroup$ This makes me thing of the people of the Gaia planet in the last book of the Asimov's saga Foundation: the knowledge of each person adds to the total knowledge of the planet. $\endgroup$ – Broken_Window Oct 28 '17 at 15:09
  • $\begingroup$ That's a great reference, it should probably be reiterated though that in context of original question, these are "simply" 5 independent brains communicating. As soon as we are trying to talk about parts of a single brain operating distantly we hit the problem John described in his answer. $\endgroup$ – Gnudiff Oct 29 '17 at 15:47

From bees hives, I know they can make decisions as a whole, and it is not exactly known how they do that. For example, if a swarm of bees want to leave the hive with the queen, about half flies away and half stays. How do they decide this?

Bees can communicate in several ways; with odor, touches, and movements. Even the sound of the hive tells the beekeeper something about its mood. Many little brains communicate with each other and make a decision concerning all of them.

I imagine something similar (creatures with a single brain) but able to communicate in a much more advanced way than humans. Imagine something like humans (or completly different), but able to communicate like bees, connecting their abilities of intelligence. Maybe they would be further able to connect physically, allowing information transfer between multiple brains in multiple ways.

Maybe they could form a single creature consisting of many connected individuals, acting like being one, but still able to cleave.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is an interesting book called "Bee Democracy" by Thomas D. Seely that describes how bees communicate and make group decisions. Scout bees investigate possible hive sites, if the sites are any good the bees return to the hive and "waggle dance" the direction, distance, site quality information of the potential new nest site to the hive. Researchers can actually follow these dance instructions too and find the new nest sites before the hive swarms! Then it's just about making group decisions on multiple potential nest sites being advertised by different scout bees. $\endgroup$ – EveryBitHelps Oct 30 '17 at 7:37

Hmm ... a lot depends on what these extra brains are, well, for. There are some great examples in nature and other answers of distributed brains for locomotion or "taking care of" body parts. Think Stegosaurus! It makes sense ... each little brain controls a segment or a tentacle or somesuch, and the "main brain" just has to send out high-level commands.

Where it gets a little tougher is distributing thinking functions. There seems to be little benefit to scattering this around the body... what are we buying in exchange for the extra time-lag?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, the theory that Stegosaurus and other sauropods had a "butt brain" appears to have been largely disregarded in the scientific community. I believe the prevailing theory now is that the space once thought to have been a sacral brain may have been something similar to a glycogen body in present-day bird. Smithsonian Mag article on the topic $\endgroup$ – Pants Oct 27 '17 at 15:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pants ... dammit, I was always a huge fan of the butt-brain. (Note to archivists, try not to take that out of context!) I'd imagined that if Stego became sentient, their science fiction would be full of tales about the "rear admiral" also becoming sentient and fighting for control of the mid-body... $\endgroup$ – akaioi Oct 27 '17 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ I know, right? I just found out a couple days ago and I feel like a part of my childhood was taken away from me. Like when they told me Pluto didn't get to be a planet any more... $\endgroup$ – Pants Oct 27 '17 at 19:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Pants don't even get me started on Pluto; I'm still furious about that. If it helps, you and I are not alone on this: lookhuman.com/design/9177-dear-nasa/tshirt $\endgroup$ – akaioi Oct 27 '17 at 20:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OMG, Pluto planet got fans! :D $\endgroup$ – Broken_Window Oct 28 '17 at 15:17

This has been done in fiction before.

This is Ki-Adi-Mundi, from the Star Wars universe:


He belongs to a race known as the Cereans. From the Wookiepedia, emphasis mine:

The Cereans were a species of sentient mammals hailing from the planet Cerea. They were distinguished by their enlarged conical cranium that contained a binary brain.

See also the Ood race, from the Doctor Who TV series. These guys have a brain in the head and a secondary brain connected to the face through something like an umbilical cord.

A few oods holding their secondary brains in special cases

In the past I have answered a question about hormonal sentience. This was about a plant or fungus creature or species that would have no identifiable brain, but rather working its consciousness through the usage of hormones to mediate chemical signals. In such a creature, you could think of each gland (or other kind of hormone-producing organ) as a separate brain or brain part, and they can be spread throughout the body. As with any other answer in this site, you can use my answer there as a basis for such a creature, tayloring it to your story writing needs. The only limit to how such a creature might be formed and how many brains it can have is your imagination.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn't know about thsi species, and I like the creativity in the last paragraph. I had in my mind a plant-like rational creature, but I had no idea where to place the brain (maybe underground?) $\endgroup$ – Broken_Window Oct 28 '17 at 15:17

We already have something similar. The brain is build up of loads of modules that mostly cooperate, but sometimes work against each other.

Read "Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite" by Robert Kurzban. It elaborates why we have this brain structure and how it works in detail. He's an evolutionary psychologist and explains this very well and in detail.

I guess you could also put physical distance between module clusters and everything would still work.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.