-3
$\begingroup$

Could an entire galaxy spanning government be able to maintain an universal basic income?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by L.Dutch, Vylix, MichaelK, dot_Sp0T, Aify Sep 7 '17 at 8:51

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Please try to better specify your problem. As it is now your question is overly too broad. $\endgroup$ – L.Dutch Sep 7 '17 at 5:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to WorldBuilding Aaron! If you have a moment please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You are currently unregistered. Please read Why should I register my account?. When you register your accounts can be merged and you can more easily keep track of your questions and answers. You also start colleting reputation so that you get more privileges such as voting and answering. $\endgroup$ – Secespitus Sep 7 '17 at 7:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your question is currently in the low-quality review queue because it is extremely short, which looks like you only have a High Concept and are dropping an idea here to brainstorm a bit. Questions have to be answerable here (there is a 30,000 character limit ;) ). Please try to edit your question to make it more suitable for the site by narrowing down the focus and explaining what you already have. Have fun! $\endgroup$ – Secespitus Sep 7 '17 at 7:09
  • $\begingroup$ How fast are people able to travel and communicate in your world? Star wars has a childlike intellectual quality to it, when luke wants to travel someplace, it takes him the number of lines in the dialogue to do so. Nobody asks questions about how this is possible. So if you want like sw, the answer is: anything you want is possible. If you want actual sci fi we need more information. $\endgroup$ – Raditz_35 Sep 7 '17 at 7:21
1
$\begingroup$

About as likely (or unlikely) as it is for an entire planet, or an entire country.

  • You would need a tax base to pay for it. This is proportional to the population size, not the number of planets.
  • You need an administration. Again this is proportional to the population size.
  • There might be problems when the cost of living differs strongly between planets (garden planet, desert world, ...). No different from the problems with a basic income when some recipients live in high-rent districts and others live in run-down neighbourhoods.
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Put like that it sounds quite doable. But advanced technical civilizations should be better resource allocation especially if they build galaxy-spanning spacecraft. $\endgroup$ – a4android Sep 7 '17 at 8:04
-1
$\begingroup$

While it doesn't seem noticeable than basic income is applied in the Star Wars universe. However, if a galaxy-spanning civilization has communications system fast enough to keep up with the movement and transportation of its citizens. This might be easier to achieve in a relativistic universe where communications is at lightspeed and travel is sublight than a universe where faster-than-light travel and communications is the norm.

What makes this kind of distribution of wealth possible is a combination of computer networks and the algorithms to ensure the allocation of basic income to its citizens. This might be as simple as if you are a citizen of the galaxy-spanning civilization you will receive your allocated quantum of income. But it is not unreasonable to presume that a galactic civilization will have a better understanding of economics that their basic income algorithms will be based on that improved knowledge.

A discussion of the pros and cons of basic income can be found here. It is introduced by the following remarks which indicate that most institutions it will have its positive and negative outcomes.

Should everyone receive an income from the government regardless of wealth?

The concept of a universal basic income is currently being explored by several European governments, gaining supporters on both the Left and the Right.

Funded from the public purse, the no-strings attached minimum payment is designed to guarantee against poverty.

Every citizen would be entitled to receive it, but would it actually work as a way of reforming social welfare?

Or, would it simply lead to greater long-term inequality?

There is no such thing as a universal panacea. But we can hope there will be small improvements.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.