15
$\begingroup$

I want a lake which contains a crater of active volcano at the bottom, which the volcano has a lava lake and the lava is still red hot in liquid state, just like lava lake above water on Earth. Is that possible?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is this on topic here? It seems suited to Earth Science $\endgroup$ – Tim Jul 25 '17 at 8:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You would get much better answers if you added science-based $\endgroup$ – can-ned_food Jul 25 '17 at 10:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you add a few details: What is the depth of this lake? What is the salinity? Is it on Earth? What is the altitude of the lake surface — more importantly, what is the atmospheric pressure above? $\endgroup$ – can-ned_food Jul 25 '17 at 10:06
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Would isolating the lava work for you (e.g. under a thick shield of glass), or do you literally need an interface between liquid water and molten rock? That would be rather violent. On Earth, there are places where the mantle is exposed under the ocean, but you probably wouldn't notice unless you're a geologist - it certainly isn't red hot; in fact, it isn't even warm. Red hot is way above the boiling point of water, even at ocean-floor level, and it would need constant replenishment of heat (which is lost quickly in water convection). $\endgroup$ – Luaan Jul 25 '17 at 10:15
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ My first instinct was "no, it would turn into a block of obsidian". I've been playing way too much Minecraft. $\endgroup$ – BenM Jul 26 '17 at 3:56
28
$\begingroup$

It's possible.

Summary:

  • At sufficiently high pressure, the water will not boil as it normally does inside earth's oceans.

  • Heat loss through convection can be stopped by naturally occurring phenomena (salt concentration gradient in natural or man-made solar ponds stops convection).


Lava has a temperature of about 700-1250°C. Water's critical point though is about 374°C. Meaning that water coming into contact with the lava lake will become a very hot (~1000°C) supercritical fluid, if the pressure down there is sufficiently high.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/500px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png

Assuming the supercritical fluid is dense enough, it will not float to the top of the (water) lake. Which would mean that the lava will not be cooled through convection and will remain a red hot fluid indefinitely.

Hotter water staying at the bottom of a "lake" is actually something that is used for storage of solar energy.

http://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/thumb/4/45/Solar_pond.png/780px-Solar_pond.png

It's kept at the bottom by having a higher concentration in salts. Apart from salts you'll need strong pressure at the bottom of the water lake, meaning that gravity needs to be very high or have a very deep lake or have your planet surrounded by very thick atmosphere:

Ptotal = Patmosphere + ( r * g * h )


Images posted under fair use.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It won't let me add more links, is there a bug? I meant to insert those 2 links as well [2]: youtube.com/watch?v=RmaJVxafesU [3]: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/… $\endgroup$ – Maria check profile Jul 25 '17 at 15:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Maria, welcome to WorldBuilding! I believe that new users are limited on how many links they can insert into an answer, to prevent spam. This looks like a well-researched answer, though! I'll see if I can edit those links in for you. $\endgroup$ – F1Krazy Jul 25 '17 at 15:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So how deep would this lake have to be, then? $\endgroup$ – CaM Jul 25 '17 at 16:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CM_Dayton It depends on the rest of the parameters in the equation i posted. This www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/water_densities.gif is related but i can't see the exact value of P for T=800 and r=1.2 $\endgroup$ – Maria check profile Jul 25 '17 at 16:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CM_Dayton Oops. The temperature in the above graph is in Kelvin, I didn't notice it. This means that T=1073K (which is not included in the graph at all). $\endgroup$ – Maria check profile Jul 26 '17 at 12:13
27
$\begingroup$

Lava in its liquid state is always red hot. The red hot is actually caused by blackbody radiation and is a side effect of any object hot enough to melt rocks.

However, objects that hot cause water to spontaneously boil, which cools the outermost shell to a sub-red-hot level.

For an example of what it really looks like, turn to Youtube!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hawaii has pillow lava. It moves slowly & isn't very gassy. The video looks like the lava is falling into the sea. For a video of an undersea volcanic eruption off Samoa, see here: youtube.com/watch?v=hmMlspNoZMs $\endgroup$ – a4android Jul 25 '17 at 3:57
  • $\begingroup$ What you see in that video are pillow lavas forming underwater, the large bubbles of lava by the gases trapped within them inflating and suddenly cooling. Pillow lava is formed wherever a lava is extruded underwater, at Hotspot volcanoes such as Hawaii and Somoa or at Mid-Oceanic ridges. $\endgroup$ – Sarriesfan Jul 25 '17 at 6:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The lava that erupts at Hawaii as at Somoa is a basalt and as such has a low viscosity compared to other types of lava. That is why it form shield volcanoes that spread out to form large volcanic cones with a low gradient.The reason it often moves slowly is the low gradient that means the pull of gravity down the cone is less than a steeper cone. $\endgroup$ – Sarriesfan Jul 25 '17 at 6:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Lava in its liquid state is always red hot. Some carbonatite lavas from Oldoinyo Lengai are actually erupted so cold (as low as 500°) that they are black but yes most lavas are red hot on eruption. $\endgroup$ – bon Jul 25 '17 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ @bon That's just peculiar. I love it when nature is peculiar! It makes me check my facts! $\endgroup$ – Cort Ammon Jul 25 '17 at 17:05
4
$\begingroup$

Problem is it would immediately boil the water which would then be replaced with more water. You would be constantly transferring heat to the oceans which would be harmful if unchecked. I believe this is to some degree overcome by Mid Atlantic smoking stacks because water boils at a far higher temperature under pressure but even there only as high as 400°C

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you add some more information to your answer? E.g. compare the boiling point of Atlantic water at 3 miles to the temperature of lava at near sea level, or how the lake would boil dry if it wasn't being fed rapidly enough or whatever. $\endgroup$ – can-ned_food Jul 25 '17 at 10:11
4
$\begingroup$

You could cap your lava with a generous bubble of pressurized gas which at depth was more dense than water. Xenon could work.

from http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Xenon_20Breathers

With every doubling of pressure, the weight of a given volume of gas doubles. The weight of a volume of water does not change with pressure. My math: 1 atm increase with 10 meters depth 1 liter H2O = 100 gm 22.4 liters water = 2240 gm 22.4 liters xenon at 1 atm = 52 gm 52x = 2240 x = 2240/52 = 43 atm or 430 meters So I figure that at 431 meters depth, a bubble of xenon will sink. Therefore a permanent subsea habitat could be made below 431 meters just by pumping a hole in the sea floor full of xenon. The xenon will not bubble out. You could access it by walking down some stairs.

Xenon is also a phenomenal insulator, with one of the lowest heat capacities of any gas. Other noble gases are used for double and triple pane windows because they are cheaper. The insulating property of this deep bubble would reduce heat transfer from lava to water.

If the xenon adjacent to the lava gets hot enough from the lava then its density will decrease lower than water to the point where it can float in water. If this happens you would lose bubbles of hot xenon to the overlying water. But the cool thing (so to speak): as the bubbles ascend, they cool in the water and when cool enough, they will stop ascending and drop back down. So this deep pool of xenon would have a lavalamplike fountain of rising and falling bubbles over it.

ADDENDUM: Better than xenon: radon.

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas_(data_page) enter image description here

Benefits 1: Radon is denser so bubble does not need to be as deep underwater.

2: Radon has even less thermal conductivity than xenon.

3: Speaking to @Donald Hobson: radon like xenon will be lost to the overlying water. But radon could outgas from the volcano, replenishing the bubble. Radon is a decay product of uranium and other heavy elements and is generated in the earth crust; buildup of radon in basements and other structures can occur and so buildup of radon over a conduit through the crust (the volcano) is very plausible. In fact one would predict this should actually happen and radon should be present around volcanos.

  1. Is it too much to propose that the radon bubble might flicker with light? But it might! There will likely be a charge difference between the lava and the overlying ocean, but these are separated by the radon bubble. Periodically, charge buildup could cause electricity to arc across the bubble. This would make the radon glow; it is after all a cousin of neon and all the noble gases glow when charged to plasma. I could not find a picture of glowing radon, but found that it is predicted to a deep violet. https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1vrzls/what_color_would_radon_glow_when_excited/

  2. In addition the pressurized radon gas will itself glow because of radioactivity. Radon at 1 atm is colorless gas but as it gets denser, the increased radioactivity produces a yellowish glow. Of course here the liquid lava will glow too, but the yellow glow will be apparent in the bubbles shooting up and falling back; the glow will become more pronounced as the bubbles cool and fall.

So: a yellow glowing highly radioactive bubble of radon, flickering violet with internal lightning, fountaining up and falling back, overlying a pool of molten lava.

That should do.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Xenon dissolves in water at pressure. $\endgroup$ – Donald Hobson Jul 25 '17 at 13:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sadly Cody from Cody's Lab tried something like this (the water + high density xenon, not the volcano) and found that the xenon dissolved into the water when under high pressure and made it freeze at room temperature. So unless the entire ocean is Xenon, it might not work so well. $\endgroup$ – Samwise Jul 25 '17 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Samwise - SWEEEET! You got Cody a subscriber! But of course it would have worked with radon. $\endgroup$ – Willk Jul 26 '17 at 20:03
2
$\begingroup$

I think we are here talking about subaqueous volcano and not submarine volcano.In the subaqueous volcano page, there is an example given which could interest you : the White Horse Bluff, a volcano which was under a lake, about half a million years ago. And according to the article, your lava lake wouldn't really exists : instead of a calm, red lake, there would be two phases. First, the water will quite fast solidify the surface of your lava lake. Second, it will erode it, and infiltrate the still molten interior of lava, causing violent explosions and exposing more lava.

You would really need very hot and very fluid lava to get a phenomenon of convection, since the water cool your lava pretty fast !

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Red hot liquid lava needs high temperature.

Liquid water under high temperature would need high pressure.

In such conditions, water would be changed in a supercritical fluid, where distinct liquid and gas phases do not exist.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.