-2
$\begingroup$

The Earth is now suffering Zombie Apocalypse. But not as serious as World War Z, or Left 4 Dead situation. Some countries have collapsed, but first world countries of America, Europe, and Eastern Asia are still fighting Zombies.
So there are the situations :

  1. USA, Europe has many areas full of zombies, but some cities hold back and national capitals are already retrieved.
  2. There are some enterprises that finally made Zombie Virus Vaccine.
  3. Many countries' government can provide shelter, food, and job, and defense from Zombies.
  4. Many countries' corporations can provide zombie virus vaccine, and a job, but you have to pay a lot for them (say, twice to thrice of your daily tax). - And I mean it is located somewhere unaccessable to zombies like underground bunkers or, maybe a ship floating on oceans...
  5. Of course many people lost their job and work for military or local town hall, or gangsters, or something.
  6. Every people think as logically, self-desired as possible. (Families might matter - but other people? No chance, altruism!)
  7. There is no law, only Martial Law.
  8. Anyone can access to weapons, electricity, water, supplies, and other utilities such as country infrastructures that are abandoned or still standing.

In these conditions, what kind of organization(Government, Corporation, NGO, Think Tank, Any possible type of foundation, Military, or just a small group of people - like in The Walking Dead, or maybe Gangsters) would be the sovereign state of Earth? Or specifically, what kind of organization would get the most advantage?
P.S. If you want to get any information about this plague or zombie, just imagine any typical Zombie Apocalypse.

(Inspired by Plague. Inc. - a charming mobile game)

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by sphennings, Vincent, Hohmannfan, James K, Paul TIKI Jun 5 '17 at 0:24

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Points 6 and 8 seem to be at odds with each other. $\endgroup$ – apaul Jun 3 '17 at 6:29
  • $\begingroup$ @apaul34208 Yes, it is. I should've written those clear - thank you. $\endgroup$ – Heart_L Jun 3 '17 at 6:30
  • $\begingroup$ As a side note... It doesn't make much sense that zombies would hit harder in rural communities than cities, it's usually the other way around in most zombie mythos. Population density and all... $\endgroup$ – apaul Jun 3 '17 at 7:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question cannot be answered in its current state. 1) Please specify what exactly the progress of the zombies is. Is there a front line or do they exist anywhere, roaming around in the woods or something? 2) Please specify how Zombies would even be a thread. They wouldn't be in the real world. One needs to know what exactly that government should provide. 3) Please make sense out of your points. Infrastructure has collapsed but the government is still running research facilities? What government? 4) How does asking a legal question make sense in this setup? Are there still courts? $\endgroup$ – Raditz_35 Jun 3 '17 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ If there is 1) A vaccine, and 2) Corporations still function (people still feel safe enough to go to work), then how is it really an apocalypse? These two factors would seem to scale down the meltdown-of-humanity to a mere tsunami-like crisis. $\endgroup$ – user535733 Jun 3 '17 at 16:09
2
$\begingroup$

I'm guessing that if militaries are still functioning to any significant degree they're in charge. Your question specifically mentions Martial Law, which tends to imply that they're already running the show in the absence of a stable civilian government.

Even if the civilian government is still around, it wouldn't be a stretch for military forces to make a power grab. Why pay for the vaccine when the labs can be seized by the military and thus the "state" or whatever is left of it... And from the sounds of it the military is the strongest remaining functional component...

Militaries have access to hardware that make them really very difficult to argue with. It's a sad statement about humanity, but a reality regardless. If they decide to be in charge after an apocalypse, they effectively are.

I guess what I'm saying is that governments, laws, and economies end up being the thin veneers' of society that fall away pretty quickly when someone rolls a tank up to the door, or points an ICBM in your direction.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is a profoundly inconsistent set of rules, so you can make up pretty much anything you like. As long as you don't want consistency.

  1. USA, Europe has many areas full of zombies, but some cities hold back and national capitals are already retrieved.

So if the cities are holding out, but not the countryside, the farms have been overrun and the cities are going to starve in very short order.

  1. There are some enterprises that finally made Zombie Virus Vaccine.

And any competent government is going to (effectively) nationalize those enterprises. This will allow emergency diversion of resources to facilitate vaccine production. If the enterprises don't want to go along, that's just too bad and they can sue the government when the crisis is over. I suggest you read up, for instance, on the actions taken during the Spanish Flu, to get an idea of just how much an epidemic can do to the normal limits to government behavior.

  1. Many countries' government can provide shelter, food, and job, and defense from Zombies.

So they are functioning national governments and will be supported by their citizenry.

  1. Many countries' corporations can provide zombie virus vaccine, and a job, but you have to pay a lot for them (say, twice to thrice of your daily tax). - And I mean it is located somewhere unaccessable to zombies like underground bunkers or, maybe a ship floating on oceans...

I assume that this is a repeat of point 2. Same answer.

  1. Of course many people lost their job and work for military or local town hall, or gangsters, or something.

And this pretty much allows any solution, depending on exactly what you mean by anything. Pick a condition and stick with it.

  1. Every people think as logically, self-desired as possible. (Families might matter - but other people? No chance, altruism!)

Cooperation in the face of a large threat is not altruism - it's called enlightened self-interest. Since you seem to think in game terms, you should be aware that the best way to get a player killed is for him or her to go off by him or herself. It's a real cliche in monster movies, signalled by ominous music on the sound track, or complete silence.

  1. There is no law, only Martial Law.

Oh good. Finally something that makes sense. The national government is attempting to unify the efforts of the whole country on an emergency basis, which pretty much defines the condition as rule by a national government.

If you mean, rule by local military forces, this means the national government has broken down and you're well into rule by local warlords.

  1. Anyone can access to weapons, electricity, water, supplies, and other utilities such as country infrastructures that are abandoned or still standing.

And who, pray tell, is running the power plants and shipping the fuel required to run them? Who is maintaining the the water systems? If everyone is operating on a "friends and family first" basis, that's not nearly enough people to provide the service outside the areas they control.

So the overall answer to your question

In these conditions, what kind of organization ... would be the sovereign state of Earth?

is

No.

That is, your conditions don't allow any organization to be in charge.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Officially? In charge of first world countries there would be civilian gov, with executive branch having all emergency law permissible power. I really doubt whether that would be officially challenged by some officers.

In practice in such power vacuum military would on some areas operate as only organized force. No one would seriously challenge that, regardless of legal nuances of any martial law act.

There would be cities surrounded by zombies with govs unable to provide them with any significant support. For all practical purposes they would be ruled by some mixture of local gov and military that ended up there.

Big pharma? Military would congratulate them their great success and apply military requisition. Except some future payment in future, they would be treated as vital for economy thus provided with extra protection and rationed goods.

If the situation start to stabilize, I see huge chance for international cooperation. I mean first world countries are generally speaking either officially allies, or at least in good relationship. Using NATO structures one would quite nicely coordinate efforts of American and European armies. Forming some joint command, would come quite easily, as long as there would some significant forces left to lead. In long run there may be already some international agreement officially forming such organization.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Outside of the immediate vicinity of the military there would be anarchy. People who have seen their loved ones killed in a nasty fashion are probably pretty crazy after that. When you have nothing to lose you don't have many limits.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.