I use "Earth-like" in this instance to describe an alternate world with conditions to lead to the evolution of humans. This planet is not Earth and exists in a different system or galaxy entirely. For the purposes of this experiment, assume all other factors are identical to Earth except that Earth has rings and no moon. What would be the differences between "RingEarth" and "MoonEarth?" I'm mainly asking for the environmental effects, such as tidal forces, magma flow, the atmosphere, and climate differences.

  • $\begingroup$ First time user here, so I hope I did all this correctly. $\endgroup$
    – Elvesflame
    Jun 2 '17 at 1:41
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to World Building! Please take a tour before make your first question! TIP: You should ask for more close question, like ¿What would be the climatical efect of not having a moon? or ¿Could my humans see the ring from the planet?, etc. But remember: please avoid having multiple questions in the same question. $\endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Jun 2 '17 at 1:50
  • $\begingroup$ @EnderLook Should I do multiple question-posts for each question? I considered that, but I'm afraid that there's likely effects in topics that I haven't considered. $\endgroup$
    – Elvesflame
    Jun 2 '17 at 2:15
  • $\begingroup$ I think that if you are asking only a few of differences you could make one cheat question. I mean, in your actual question you could write: With that Q, I am asking about: • Religion (e.g: The moon is used in a lot of religions like a deity, would be the "ring" used like a deity? What kind of deity?) • Social and Cultural (There are plenty of poems and books about the Moon, Would my world loose all this chunk of culture? • Political (What would happen with the space-race?). But if they are a lot os questions you should think in split them in different post, for better understanding. $\endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Jun 2 '17 at 2:47
  • $\begingroup$ Please ignore @EnderLook's advice. He is being overzealous. Yes you can ask a myriad questions which may be irrelevant. Your question is about the differences between our Earth and a ringed Earth. It is not impossible to answer giving the principal differences. If more precision is required then narrower questions can be asked. If you want answers about agriculture, then a focused question on agriculture later. $\endgroup$
    – a4android
    Jun 2 '17 at 2:53

Earth With Rings

The Rings

First things first. Rings around a planet are comparatively short-lived. For example, there is speculation that the rings of Saturn may be very young and only have a 100 million or so years left in existence. They will fall into the plant thanks to gravitation interactions between other bodies in the solar system and radiation pressure from the sun. The important takeaway is that rigs from through some other cataclysm after a plant has formed.

So your planet will form much like the earth, accrete mass, clear out its orbit, get hit by another body and form the moon. Hey look the earth has rings!

enter image description here

Spoiler: They don't last long.

Now here is where the history of this planet diverges from our own. This impact forms two moons. One of which becomes just like our moon, because it's very important. The other does its own thing for a while and is much smaller and identical in composition.

If you want a planet like Earth (oxygen, life, really okay place to live), it needs to have a history similar to the earth. It took the earth ~4.1 billion years before it got to conditions close to today, and ~4.6 billion years to get to humans. Note My source doesn't start the time at the formation, but ~700 million years later. Which means that this planet needs to get to get its rings sometime after 4 billion years has passed because the rings themselves may last only a few hundred million years.

This is where that second moon comes in, say ~4.4-ish billion years after the planet formed. Thanks to gravitational interactions it has finally spiraled in too close to the earth and reaches its Roche Limit and breaks up. For a body like a moon that's a distance of about 10,000 km above the surface of the earth, half as high as GPS satellites.

This is really bad. Shortly after the initial breakup, parts of the moon will rain down on the earth. One mountain sized rock probably wiped out the dinosaurs, there may be thousands of them raining down. In all likely hood, this will sterilize the planet and you will get a world not too different from Venus with rings.

Because that answer is boring, let's examine the case where the Hard Rain is relatively mild and life finds a way to thrive afterward.

The planet

This planet will be quite different from the earth. The area under the rings will be an exclusion zone because the material will continue to fall to the earth for millions of years. Expect lots of craters and volcanism due to damage to the tectonic plates. Impact damage may be less severe due to rocks falling in at only orbital speeds ~8 km/s rather than the usual 20-30 km/s.

The shoreline will also be a no-go zone because of tsunamis caused by impacts to the oceans, tides will be unaffected by the rings because they are distributed across the planet.

The sky may be constantly hazy due to a much higher frequency of impacts. Heat from the reentry and dust may contribute to extreme weather by providing extra energy and condensation points for water droplets.The atmosphere may cause cancer, the dust causing Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis. Overall expect the planet to be cooler due to the dust, the light blocked by the rings will have less of an effect in comparison.

Magma movement will not be affected.

There will also be more UV radiation from the reentries of the rings.

Possibly Less of a night because of light bouncing off the rings and the dust halo around the earth.

And probably a whole lot more which will be added as I think of it.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for answering! So would the impacts continue through the whole time, or would there be a period of time where the world is relatively stable? If there is, that could be an interesting doomsday dynamic, but if rings will make RingEarth living hell, we'll probably scrap that. $\endgroup$
    – Elvesflame
    Jun 2 '17 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Elvesflame Yes, the impacts would last through the entire lifespan of the rings. The rate is dependent on a whole bunch of things, but expect smaller stuff to come down much more frequently than larger stuff. Grain of sand-sized particles may be coming down constantly, lighting up the atmosphere, and say house-sized chunks come down every couple decades, mountain-sized every few million years. Also, the impacts will occur mostly at the equator. $\endgroup$ Jun 2 '17 at 5:17
  • $\begingroup$ @Elvesflame The planet will probably be a living hell $\endgroup$ Jun 2 '17 at 5:26
  • $\begingroup$ Is possible to have an stable ring without using magic or legendary technology? I mean, a ring with eternal lifespan. $\endgroup$
    – Ender Look
    Jun 2 '17 at 12:55
  • $\begingroup$ @EnderLook No, by their nature rings are not a stable system over very long periods of time. If the ring was constantly being replenished then you could get it to last longer, but eventually you will run out of material. $\endgroup$ Jun 2 '17 at 13:04

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.