I have a world where certain species of dragon live along the coasts, eating off the fish from the sea.

I like the idea that they can fly through the air and swim in pursuit of fish but I'm not sure that would be practical because the wings would cause drag. I'm also not sure whether they would even need them, because once they've got the sea who needs the air?

  • 8
    $\begingroup$ If you look at the D&D 3.5e book "Draconomicon", they have lots of detailed explanations of how dragons in their world work, including some which have coastal habitats and swim. I'd recommend it as a reference. $\endgroup$
    – Phiteros
    May 24, 2017 at 6:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Several (still flying) birds hunt fish in pretty deep water and they don't have a problem with it. Maybe don't make your dragon as big as a truck but as small as a fish-eating bird. If you are ok with having basically a sea lion and call it a dragon, well, why even ask? Why do we need legs when we have cars btw? $\endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    May 24, 2017 at 9:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can't you just handwave it, just like you handwave the fact that no creature of the characteristics of a dragon could ever fly (or exist)? $\endgroup$
    – Rekesoft
    May 24, 2017 at 12:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Rekesoft but dragons don't know it so they go on flying anyway $\endgroup$
    – frarugi87
    May 24, 2017 at 14:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @frarugi87 I have always thought it's more a Discworld paradox: they exist (and they fly) because people believe they do. :) $\endgroup$
    – Rekesoft
    May 24, 2017 at 14:43

6 Answers 6


As you pointed out, the large wings needed to sustain flight in air would become a problem in water, causing excessive drag. This however doesn't make it impossible.

I think you have two choices:

  1. Dragon penguin style: ability to fly totally lost, shortened wings to enable agile maneuvering in water. The sea is their main habitat (food harvesting and movement), and they use land for nesting.
  2. Dragon seagull/cormorant style: they keep the ability to fly but they are able to retract their wings while diving into the sea for fishing. They can do some maneuvering underwater to chase their prey. Air is still their main habitat, sea is used to gather food but not for moving, dry land is used for nesting.
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ I would add 3. Flying fish style: Ability to make powerful, self-propelled leaps out of water into air, where their long, wing-like fins enable gliding flight for considerable distances above the water's surface. $\endgroup$
    – Umbranus
    May 24, 2017 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Umbranus, I excluded that as OP didn't ask for fish-like dragon. $\endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    May 24, 2017 at 8:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see. I did not really mean it should be like a fish, just that it could have a mixture between fins and wings enough for gliding but not for flying. Something in between penguin and seagull. $\endgroup$
    – Umbranus
    May 24, 2017 at 12:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why not 3.: Retract their wings and swim with their feet (all 4 of them). Folded wings shouldn’t cause much drag and webbed feet and a “paddle” tail would be quite effective. $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    May 24, 2017 at 16:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Option 3 they use their wings to fly AND to swim, Shearwaters are known for this. They use a modified flight strole to swim underwater. in essence they are flying underwater. BBC's Blue planet even caught footage of them doing it large groups.youtube.com/watch?v=zzgk__0bezk $\endgroup$
    – John
    Jun 13, 2018 at 1:43

The real world has plenty of examples of birds that ca swim brilliantly, so obviously wings aren't a disadvantage per se. However, there are a few caveats:

  • Wings consist of very large surfaces, which means increased drag. This can be mitigated by folding the wings away. Dragon wings are bat-like, which means they fold quite neatly - in fact, because skin stretches while feathers don't, you might be able to fold them better than a bird can.
  • Aerodynamics are somewhat different from hydrodynamics. You may find that a dragon whose wings are optimised for flying can't really use them to swim very well, or conversely, a dragon who can swim excellently may end up a less-than-excellent flyer.

However, besides the mechanical, there's also a biological aspect to consider. A bird's wings are mostly feather. Feathers are not living tissue, do not require blood supply, and are very good insulators. This allows swimming birds to extend their wings more or less with impunity underwater, and to retain their body heat while swimming. A dragon's wings, however, are batlike, meaning that they are mostly skin, and a dragon is covered with scales, which do not trap air like feathers. This means that a dragon will rapidly lose body heat when submerged, and the moment they extend their wings, they start to act like radiators and the dragon starts losing heat even faster. Given that dragons are lizard-like, you may decide that they are cold-blooded, which means that heat loss is a serious problem. It's not an insurmountable problem - there are aquatic reptiles in the real world, such as swimming snakes and the marine iguanas of the Galapagos Islands - but it does limit you to warmer waters only.

Alternatively, you could say that because dragons breathe fire, they have an internal source of heat, but even so, they probably wouldn't enjoy this rapid cooling. On the other hand, you could say that a dragon's internal fire causes them to overheat, and they use their dives into the sea to cool off so that they don't expire (or combust!).

This could also answer your secondary question: why can swimming dragons still fly? A dragon who breathes fire might need to dip in the sea to cool off periodically, but their fire doesn't work so well underwater, so they never become fully aquatic. If they nest above water, then they're at risk from predators and egg thieves. Nesting on cliffs or high places makes it harder for most things to reach them, which gives them a reason to retain the ability to fly. At that point their main threat is birds, who use feathers, which fire is quite effective against. In fact, fire may be more effective at nest defence than at hunting; provided the cliffs (or wherever the nest is) are largely non-flammable (so that the dragon doesn't catch itself in a forest fire), breathing fire into the air from a static, grounded position is likely easier than trying to breathe fire on a grounded target while flying over it - not to mention that using fire to hunt may result in a meal that is either unreachable due to being in the middle of a brushfire, or inedible by virtue of being mostly charcoal and ash.

Thus, you have a creature that uses fire to defend their nest against the birds who are able to reach its inaccessible location, while frequently taking dives into the sea to cool off using its large, radiator-like wings to avoid self-inflicted heatstroke or self-ignition.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ your last point creates the awesome mental image of steaming dragons emerging from the sea (in slow motion, naturally). $\endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    May 24, 2017 at 11:04
  • $\begingroup$ @JoeBloggs and now I'm imagining pressurised steam rising with them, so they emerge in a literal explosion of steam... $\endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    May 24, 2017 at 15:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given that dragons are lizard-like - don't make the same mistake people did with dinosaurs: dragons are bird-like, hot-blooded, quick and intelligent. Cold-blooded lizardish dragons that sleep in the Sun all day to heat up would be boring... and quickly extinct! $\endgroup$ May 24, 2017 at 15:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A lizard who has a fire in their belly would always be warm, though, and therefore pretty active! $\endgroup$ May 24, 2017 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Mat'sMug Komodo dragons are doing okay. Their biggest danger is humans. $\endgroup$
    – JAB
    May 24, 2017 at 18:53

It depends on the dragon. Western mythological dragons look like pterosaurs, while Eastern (asian) mythological dragons are much more snake-like, and they don't even have wings. After all, they fly because of magic so, why should they need wings at all?

An asian style of dragon is an excellent swimmer, just like snakes or eels are, and there's no problem with wings.


Look for analogy.

There are birds. Some of them fly, some swim. They are like dragons, really. Except it takes a lot of work to make dragon flight possible.

We have birds that can't fly at all. We have some that can only on the surface, wings above waterline. Then we have wing propelled and foot propelled diving birds. You just need to read more about them and you'll see how it affects wings.

Generally birds that use wings in water evolve smaller wings and no longer can, nor need to fly. Just as you stated in your question. The ones that use foot can keep wings close to the body and avoid drag. Some can fly all right. Some gave up the sky. You can feasibly apply any of these to your dragons. You can even have few varieties, why not.


Another possibility to consider is the carapace, like some insects (mostly in the beetle family) have. Essentially, the flying wings fold up and are stored under the hard carapace, which is split and moves out of the way when the wings are to be extended for flying. If the carapace is shaped such that your dragon's body is hydrodynamic when the flying wings are not in use, you can then have a different propulsion mechanism for in-water movement.

The downside is that beetles aren't really efficient flyers, even among insects - and there's probably a point where the mass of the carapace makes it unreasonable, meaning that you're quite unlikely to have large dragons.


If wings cause drag, then just fold the wings up when underwater.

(Note: This may work better for short periods of time.)

Proof? See this.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .