In most fantasy stories elemental fire magic is used either as a substitute for guns in warfare, but in a modern setting how would the military use fire elementals?


  • novice level: being able control fire
  • experienced level: being able to control heat, not just fire
  • expert level: being able to control electricity
  • top ten percent: being able to generate limited amounts of plasma
  • $\begingroup$ As really awesome flame throwers to flush people out of buildings and such, I suppose. $\endgroup$ – Jason C May 6 '17 at 5:15
  • $\begingroup$ Suicide bombers? $\endgroup$ – Kilisi May 6 '17 at 5:35
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Still too broad. You need to define specifically how the control of the elements work, otherwise the question is too opinion based and broad and is basically raw idea generation. For example, if being able to control "heat" implies that I can control the movement of energy from one source to another; does this mean i can freeze my enemies to death by moving all the heat out of their body? Furthermore, if the heat and electricity comes out of nowhere, what's stopping the military from abusing the free energy created from the energy manipulators? $\endgroup$ – Aify May 6 '17 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ On a larger scale, being able to control heat means I can control the weather (to an extent) by controlling "warm air" currents, which allows for a huge amount of strategies to work. Imagine, instant storms devastating any target city you want to terrorize or attack. You mention plasmas; is this thermal plasma creation or non-thermal plasma creation? $\endgroup$ – Aify May 6 '17 at 6:11
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of How can elemental control be used in a modern military? - You "narrowed" it to one element, right, but still you did not provide any clarifications asked there. $\endgroup$ – Mołot May 6 '17 at 8:57

Modern militaries depend on things which go boom. They have to store those somewhere. Generally, the place you store ammunition is called a magazine or ammo compartment.

If the enemy can magically introduce the force of fire into your magazines at will, he can "cook off" your ammo inside your vehicles. Any fighting vehicle is finished (except a few modern tanks designed to survive that). No aircraft can survive a carried bomb detonating (it may be able to eject a missile engine firing on the rail). A magazine fire on-ship becomes a "save your ship" emergency; the larger ones can flood their magazines with seawater. They certainly they won't be doing any fighting at that point.

So a fire-manipulator who really knows what he's doing, can take all the fight out of a modern military. If anything it creates an interesting opportunity for a relatively nonviolent way to end a war.

  • $\begingroup$ If fire magic can START a fire, can it STOP one as well? Pretty much every vehicle and weapon system we have relies on combustion! Stop than and EVERYTHING grinds to a halt (or falls from the sky). Maybe the nuc ships could keep on going with the electrical rail guns but everyone else is back to boots n bayonets :) $\endgroup$ – Jason K May 8 '17 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonK true, but you only have to blow their magazine once. You have to snuff out their engines continuously, unless you can install a persistent "no fire" charm. Well, an airplane you'd only need to do it for 20 minutes or so. But as Stalin said, "quantity has a quality all its own", and if your mages must channel the no-fire spell, they would simply get more units than you have mages, and use swarming tactics. $\endgroup$ – Harper - Reinstate Monica May 8 '17 at 17:43

"The ability to control fire" and "modern military" are entirely exclusive. The two cannot exist together.

What is a modern military if not controlled fire. Fire in the breach, fire in the hole, burning jet fuel, engine fuel.

To control fire implies also to suppress fire, fire suppression over an area turns a modern military into a bunch of guys with expensive scrap metal. Guns won't fire, engines won't run, planes fall out of the sky, bombs and missiles won't explode, it's all ultimately fire.

Even if you don't allow fire suppression, aircraft that explode with a wave of the hand or the ability to detonate an ammo dump with a thought, equally shuts out any modern military capabilities.

  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, but most literary fire magic consists entirely of producing fire, not suppressing it. I've run across lots of stories with fire demons, but never a Smokey the Bear demon. $\endgroup$ – WhatRoughBeast May 6 '17 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ @WhatRoughBeast well yes, because fire raising is more fun than fire extinguishing, but every so often they show that fire extinguishing is possible $\endgroup$ – Separatrix May 6 '17 at 19:12

To answer the question: I'd say the ability would be something like dropping napalm from a plane, without a plane. It would also be nice for cooking and warming up the campsite, I guess. It could allow a single wizard to stop an oncoming charge, defeat a cavalry charge or beach landing. Burn a village to the ground from atop a hill or tree. It might offer a unique escape: let the wizard climb a tree in the forest, and then burn everything around him (but not his own tree) to kill or drive off soldiers pursuing him in the forest.

ELECTRICAL: Both the brain and heart are absolutely dependent upon finely controlled electrical impulses; which are typically self-regulating. This is why a defibrillator works; the shock forces a new electrical state which a heart can self-regulate back into a normal rhythm. Control of electricity allows a wizard to cause anything from instant unconsciousness, epileptic-like seizures, heart attacks or just instant death, by disrupting or overloading biological electric impulses. Also, of course, disrupting or destroying any electrical device, just like lightning can, and (like an electric arc welder) it might be used to melt or deform metal.

PLASMA: not very useful, but hot enough to burn through metal and stone, perhaps.


can I be frank for a moment? I don't think you know much about the world we live in and what plasma, fire or electricity is. I recommend getting some high school level book about physics and reading a bit and then comming back to ask questions. Please double check plasma because I think you just read that word once and now want to write a book about it.

Controlling a fire sounds like you are able to control the shape of the flame. Please understand how unspecific your question is. Here is my best guess though:

  1. Being able to control the shape of a flame as no applications in contemporary military since scorched earth tactics and other barbaric strategies are no longer used most of the time. The only way that would be useful that I can think of is to start large wildfires - which is already pretty easy.

  2. Controlling the heat sounds a bit more useful. So how fast is this working? If you can melt an aircraft carrier within a couple of milliseconds, this would solve almost all problems the human race is facing right now. If you need a day to make scrambled eggs - nobody cares. Is this once again about deciding in which direction heat flows? This would certainly have industrial applications, maybe in weapon manufacturing? The interpretations and applications of this one could fill books.

  3. Controlling electricity is the most vague one yet. Even if you can rain down lightning on enemy armies, this would a) once again be barbaric and not really done by any serious military and b) pretty useless in most modern battlefields, e.g. cities for example and finally c) so powerful with so many applications that our world would be completely different. If you can control the way currents flow - well, a normal human isn't nearly fast enough for this. Please check out how fast electrical signals are transmitted.

  4. Creating small amounts of plasma sounds a bit like digestive problems. Please be more specific and read what plasma is and how this is already included in 1), 2) and 3).

Oh, and another note: Of course most warfare is still barbaric, but a lot of this has to do with how much money all those tools cost. If you get the same result for free, we would see a lot less of barbaric behaviour. Be aware that a lot of warfare is because of economic reasons.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.