How high is less useful a question than how far.
How Far?
Without even considering the physiology of the jumper, we can immediately consider how the change in gravity would affect horizontal distance for the jumper (or any object). Consider the equation for distance with velocity:
$d = vt$
Where d = distance, v = velocity, and t = time. If we want something to go travel farther, we need to increase velocity and/or time.
Now consider the equation for the fall time of an object starting at a velocity of 0 m/s:
$t = \sqrt{2d/g}$
Where d = distance and g = our gravity. In this scenario, we know that a = 1/2 earth's gravity. With that in mind, we can make the assertion that fall time for an object on the new planet will be approximately 41% ($\sqrt{1/(1/2)}$) longer than the fall time for an object on earth in similar circumstances.
Using information and the earlier equation, we also now know that the travel distance for an object will be about 41% farther than a similar object on earth - minus the effects of drag.
Take Olympic long jumping, for example: the Men's record is held by Bob Beamon 8.9 M, or 29.16 ft. That same person performing on your planet would manage a 12.55 M or 41.12 ft. long jump.
All that being said, there is the issue of physiology in the low-gravity environment, and that will play a role in maximum jump distance. However, once you've figured a jump height and running speed, you can use the previous equations to render it to an approximate answer that assumes a parabolic trajectory.
As for thrown objects, all of that holds true, just with slightly different issues of figuring out throw velocity and angle, then expanding that throw velocity to the vertical speed and horizontal speed. From there, use the following equations for throw time and throw distance:
$t = 2\cdot (V/4.905)$ | V = vertical speed
$d = H\cdot t$ | H = horizontal speed, t = time, solved from above