A fault that ruptures causing an earthquake can cause a chain reaction of dynamically triggered earthquakes in nearby faults, thus causing a much larger seismic event. What are some high unlikely but still plausible ways to stop this chain reaction of earthquakes, in progress, so that a major city is not destroyed in the end?

  • $\begingroup$ Earthquakes are energy released from built up tension and compression in the plate. One could hypothesize that preventing those secondary releases could potentially lead to a much more dangerous earthquake further down the line - which actually could make a great plot line. 'We tried to fix it and made things worse' isn't a bad plot device in sci fi. Just some thoughts. $\endgroup$ – Sean Boddy Mar 19 '17 at 21:52

It actually may not be that sci-fi at all: lubricating the fault line could mitigate the situation by allowing easy movement of the faults rather than the snapping action that traditionally produces earthquakes.

More explanation for clarity

Earthquakes are the result of pent-up stresses in within the crust of the Earth (technically the interactions at plate boundaries but I'll get to that in a second) suddenly gets released. Generally speaking, the tectonic plates of the Earth are constantly in motion but this motion gets hung up at the plate boundaries due to friction between the plates. Over time this stoppage allows enormous amounts energy to become stored in the deformations of the rocks. You get an earthquake when this pent up stress overcomes the friction binding up the system. The crust of the earth springs back producing the earthquake. The key here is the plates of the earth bind up due to friction between them allowing all this energy to build which inevitably leads to an earthquake.

So if you could somehow prevent this stress from building or limiting the magnitude that builds before the slippage, then you can stop or reduce the destructiveness of an earthquake. For example, lubricating it, quite literally putting something between the plates to make them slip past one another more easily. My link references water acting as lubricant, but I've seen ideas of using oils or even nanomachines to facilitate the movement.

  • $\begingroup$ Could you elaborate your answer in greater detail? I am not sure I understand what you mean by "lubricating". This could be a good answer to the question and I would probably upvote it if you described your plan in greater detail. (I didn't read the link as answers should provide all the necessary information as a link can go out-of-date. Maybe a summary of that would be enough?) $\endgroup$ – Sec SE - clear Monica's name Mar 20 '17 at 13:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Secespitus is my edit satisfactory? $\endgroup$ – Joe Kissling Mar 20 '17 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ Perfect! Thanks for the edit; +1 from me $\endgroup$ – Sec SE - clear Monica's name Mar 20 '17 at 16:11

That depends on how much scify you are willing to accept.

I'm pretty certain it is not yet possible to do that, but as an earthquake is a wave, a wave with correlationfactor -1 would nullify that wave.

Another way would be to reflect the wave by previously having built something that reflects earthquakes deep into the earth.

Or, even further from possible, if you were able to liquidify a big amount of earth around the city but horizontally contained, the earthquake might be reflected at the boundary just as ultrasound waves are reflected on boundaries between air/water or bone/water.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.