5
$\begingroup$

I'd like to make a sentient plant species that can perform tasks such as communication and problem solving.

My Definition of Sentience

When asking this question, I mean sentient as in able to rationalize and solve problems without solely relying on instinct. I believe there are two levels of sentience. The first is animal level sentience, which is basically where they are able to communicate and socialize on a low level and have simple emotions. The second is human level sentience. Our emotions, thoughts, and social lives are extremely complex compared to animal's. I am looking for the human level sentience in these plants.

What I Already Know

I know that technically speaking a plant is a life form that uses photosynthesis to produce food for itself in order to survive (though other life forms can do photosynthesis too). That's about it. I am not a botanist.

What I'd Like to Know

I'd like to know how this hypothetical species could fit my definition of sentience (I'd also like for them to be mobile, but it's not a must) while still technically being considered a plant. (please note: I am not wondering whether or how a plant could develop sentience, this question is more about whether a sentient plant is still a plant while being intelligent as a human)

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

It would be something like this:

Audrey 2

There are two issues you need to overcome with a plant like this. The first is the sentience quotient (SQ). SQ is a measure of how fast bits can be processed vs. the mass of their calculating organs, measured in bits/s/kg, and usually shown on a logarithmic scale. All neuron based life forms sit within a cluster around +13, including humans. Plants score a -2 while carnivorous plants like Audrey 2 rank at a +1. The first challenge would be overcoming the massive 10-orders-of-magnitude difference in processing rate.

The easy solution would be to let plants use neurons, but there's a price to pay. Neurons are not cheap to maintain. The human body dedicates 20% of its total power to the brain. This is where the limits of photosynthesis come in. It's not possible to generate enough power for such a brain using photosynthesis (I believe there was a past question on WorldBuilding regarding whether a human could live of photosynthesis alone, and the answer was "not even close").

Probably your best bet would be to abandon photosynthesis as a primary food mechanism, and instead have an immobile creature that feeds off prey animals. Perhaps it hypnotizes them into drawing too close. That would require a real brain to accomplish.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is a very thorough answer, thank you. I just up voted it. But it still didn't address one issue: is a plant still a plant if it abandons photosynthesis altogether? Or are you saying this creature will still be able to use photosynthesis on a low scale, just as a minor way to obtain energy. $\endgroup$ – BlippThePanda Mar 14 '17 at 1:43
  • $\begingroup$ @BlippThePanda photosynthesis is not a requirement to be consider something a plant. In fact, there are instances of plants that lack the pigments for photosynthesis. For example the Monotropastrum humile. $\endgroup$ – Theraot Mar 15 '17 at 5:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Theraot The page for that plant mentions that it uses a fungi for its energy, but I'm failing to understand what exactly that means. Do you know if that means it is fungi and not a plant? Or has a symbiotic relationship with fungi that grows on it maybe? $\endgroup$ – Bazul Mar 16 '17 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Bazul it is a plant parasitic on fungi. This should help understand how it gets nutrients: Mycorrhizal fungi associated with Monotropastrum humile (Ericaceae) in central Japan. See also Myco-heterotrophy. $\endgroup$ – Theraot Mar 16 '17 at 20:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.