I'd like to know the logistics of this. I mean liquid rings is not too far fetched if not very unlikely. But since the rings are far from the planet's surface what would the implications of gravitational pull be on actually being able to have boats in them?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "liquid rings is not too far fetched" - why yes, it is too far fetched. What liquid you have in mind? Surely not water, it would freeze. $\endgroup$ – Mołot Jan 16 '17 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ Quick check: are you thinking the boats would be floating on the surface of the liquid, with the liquid being in a 0-gee orbit around the planet? $\endgroup$ – Cort Ammon Jan 16 '17 at 18:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't know if this is possible or not, but +1 on question for one of the prettiest visions a question on this forum has yet inspired for me. I want this to be viable. $\endgroup$ – SRM Jan 16 '17 at 19:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you have lead rings, and a liquid float on top of that? Lead has a bunch of mass(therefore gravity), but would it be enough to hold the liquid in place? $\endgroup$ – cybernard Jan 16 '17 at 23:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I voted to reopen. Liquid rings is only the start of this challenge. $\endgroup$ – SRM Jan 17 '17 at 4:49

Ignoring how all that mass got into orbit, liquid rings dense enough to sail a boat on need to overcome three problems:

  • Temperature
  • Pressure
  • Tidal Effects

The first two are about the mere existence of a liquid in orbit. The last is about it holding together as a contiguous dense fluid body against the planet's tidal forces. Temperature we can deal with by putting our hypothetical gas giant as close or far from its star as possible. The big problem is pressure.

What Can Be Liquid In Orbit?

The state of mater (solid, liquid, gas, plasma, and some more exotic things) is a function of temperature AND pressure. Make it too cold or put it under too much pressure, and liquid will turn to solid. Make it too hot or put it under too little pressure, and liquid will turn to gas. Liquids hold a small "just right" place. This is visualized with a phase diagram.

enter image description here

Pressure is the problem: there isn't a lot of it in space. Below a certain point of pressure and temperature you cannot have liquids; only solids and gases. If you heat a solid in a vacuum it will sublimate directly to gas. That's called the triple point, that dot in the middle, where a thing can be a gas, liquid, or solid. Everything to the left of and below it is a solid or gas.

There are also some anomalous materials, like water, who can be solid below the triple point, but only by a little bit. That's what that dashed green line represents, the behavior of water going from liquid to solid.

So we need something whose triple point lies near the vacuum of space and that is a problem.

Let's be generous and start with the pressure at the Kármán line, the accepted beginning of "space" at 100 km above the Earth's surface, as the pressure we have to deal with: 3.2e-5 kPa or 0.0000000032% of surface atmosphere.

Anything that can remain liquid at that pressure can remain in orbit for at least a few dozen years while its orbit is slowly degraded by drag on the wispy atmosphere. The lower the pressure a material can handle, the higher the orbit, the lower the pressure, and the longer it can remain in orbit.

What has a triple point below 3.2e-5 kPa? Looking at this table of triple points our options are Mercury and Ethanol. There may be more exotic materials we could use, but for the common stuff that's it.


Mercury has its triple point at 1.65e-7 kPa well within the near-vacuum of outer space, and at a temperature of 234 K which is about -40C. This is plenty feasible to remain liquid in orbit around a gas giant.

Mercury is also a good choice because it's chemically fairly non-reactive, so you might be able to find it in its elemental form.

The problem with mercury is it's a heavy metal and thus fairly rare in the universe. The Earth's crust contains only about 0.08 ppm (parts per million) of mercury. Even Earth's riches ores are only a few percent mercury. Getting an entire ring of it around a planet dense enough to sail a boat on is very unlikely by natural or even artificial means.


This is our best chance. Its triple point is 150 K at 4.3e-7 kPa. That's VERY cold (-123 C) and VERY sparse, two orders of magnitude less dense than at the Kármán line.

Even better, ethanol is a fairly simple combination of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen, very abundant in the universe. It occurs naturally in outer space. Getting enough of it together to form a ring is feasible.

We have our material! Now, can we have it in a ring?

The Roche Limit

The reason rings exist is because of gravitational tidal forces and the Roche Limit. If you have a spherical body like a moon orbiting a dense body with high gravity like the Earth, that moon will feel a slightly greater tug on its side near the Earth and a slightly less tug on its side further away. The side closer will have to orbit a bit faster, and the side further away will have to orbit a bit slower.

If the moon is big enough and close enough, these forces literally tear it apart. The bits closer to the planet string out ahead, and the bits further away from the planet string out behind. You get a ring. The point where this happens is called the Roche Limit.

enter image description here

This is good, we want a ring. But we want a ring that's thick enough to float a boat on, so it can't be too stringy.

The Roche Limit of a spherical fluid body in orbit can be approximated using the ratios of the density of the two bodies. 2.44 R1 (P1 / P2)1/3. The density of ethanol near its triple point is about 8.7e-12 g/cm3 (water at standard temperature and pressure is about 1g/cm3) while the density of the Earth is 5.5 g/cm3 and Jupiter is 1.3 g/cm3.

Unfortunately this is for a spherical body. Calculating the thickness of a ring is beyond my capabilities. So I'll leave this answer here for someone else to figure out.

Can You Float On It?

Well... no. Not conventionally. As @SRM correctly points out in the comments you can't float without an acceleration pulling you down. Usually that's provided by the force of gravity while you're standing on the surface of a planet. Since both the boat and the ring are in orbit, they're both in free fall, so a boat would just orbit on its surface. Its not floating, it's just in the same orbit.

In order to "float", you'd have to artificially induce a downward acceleration. Basically you'd have a small thruster pushing down through the bottom of the boat and towards the surface of the ethanol. You can do this in any orientation you like, towards the planet, way from the planet... you name it, so long as the axis of thrust goes through the center of mass of the boat, through the bottom, and through the center of mass of the ethanol.

However, with no vessel to contain the ethanol, I believe the boat will cause the ethanol to spread out laterally rather than provide buoyancy. Though I'm not 100% sure. Maybe with enough ethanol relative to the size of the boat its own force of gravity can hold it together. However, given how sparse ethanol is in near vacuum, 12 orders of magnitude less dense than water at standard temperature and pressure, that would have to be A LOT of ethanol. Perhaps ethanol on a solid core of a dense material would work.

This is where the Roche Limit becomes a problem as you're essentially putting a liquid torus in orbit, make it too thick and too close and it tears itself apart. Put it further away and its mass increases as its circumference increases.

If its core is solid that adds another problem, solid rings do not have stable orbits. Since one side of the ring will be ever so slightly closer to the planet than another it will feel a bit more of a tug than the opposite. That will drag it a little closer increasing the pull of gravity, while the far side moves further away decreasing it. Eventually, one side of the solid ring will crash into the planet. Some sort of active stabilization will be needed, though how you do that through probably kilometers of liquid ethanol I'm not sure. Complicating things are all those thrusters on all those boats providing thrust in all different directions. I don't know how fast this will all fall apart, could be days, could be centuries.

Again, at this point I've hit my limits. It is gorgeous to think about looking down at the surface of a "lake", seeing the Earth reflected in it, and looking up to see the Earth itself.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Good answer, but you also missed one spot at the very beginning. Sailing "on" something in 0 G is impossible, buoyancy does not work without gravity. $\endgroup$ – Mołot Jan 16 '17 at 19:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Mołot I believe its own gravity can provide the "vessel" and the downward force can be controlled by the boat so as to not "burst" the "vessel". Just as you could float on a planet whose surface is entirely liquid. The question is how thick does this torus of ethanol have to be to hold itself together with a boat floating on the surface? Given how incredibly sparse liquid ethanol is in a near vacuum, it would probably have to be quite large. Alternatively, it could be formed around a solid core of something dense. $\endgroup$ – Schwern Jan 16 '17 at 19:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A) @Molot Can we solve the buoyancy problem by sailing on the outside of the rings, with the planet below us, instead of the surface of the rings? B) I think we should brainstorm around artificial means of maintaining the rings without the solid core. It's really a problem keeping the ethanol stirred up and moving at fast enough acceleration to avoid clumping, right? Can we do that with some sort of pump that pushes the orbital current? (I'm way off in brainstorm land on this, I know.) $\endgroup$ – SRM Jan 16 '17 at 20:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Symbols A ring of very dense solid material around the planet, probably iron since it's very common, with an ocean of ethanol covering its surface. The iron would provide the gravity to hold the ethanol together against the weight of a boat floating on its surface. It would need to be a lot, and it would be unstable. $\endgroup$ – Schwern Jan 16 '17 at 20:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Molot True, but what was in my head was... never mind. I went to explain it and realized that wouldn't work. sigh Ok... let's talk submarine swimming through the rings then. We stick a platform up above the surface that pretends to be a sailboat, but the main navigation is under the surface. More viable direction? Don't need bouyancy if the sub is neutral with respect to the ethanol. $\endgroup$ – SRM Jan 16 '17 at 21:00

Very Impractical, pretty much impossible

Alright well I'll make a few assumptions, such as; the liquid is water, it is somehow not frozen.

If these conditions are true then yes, the rings could be dense enough. 'Could' because it is however extremely unlikely, and will vary massively on the size of the planet-hence circumference of the ring.

If the rings are dense enough you do however have several other problems. Assuming the watercraft is air tight, you'll still have the problem of gravity which means the watercraft is slowly going to be pulled towards the centre of mass (the core of the gas-planet). Also it will be difficult to remain in the water or get traction since it is zero-gravity.

To conclude it would be virtually impossible in reality but if the ring was liquid it would still be extremely impractical. A space station near the rings is a more realistic alternative.

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.