Concerning long term effects of zero gravity on humans living in space compared with those living on super earths with 1.5x to 2x G, how could the gravity differences cause reproductive failure among the two groups? What biologic traits might be selected for (or against) that would start to cause infertility between humans living in zero gravity, and those living on planets with more gravity than earth?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is worth noting that NASA scientists believe it is most likely impossible to carry a child to term in zero gravity. The process is believed to be too exacting to complete all of its functions without the presence of a gravitational field to provide direction. They could be wrong, of course, but you should factor this into your worldbuilding endeavors. $\endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 17:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CortAmmon Interesting little factoid there, you have any reading material I could dig into? $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 19:47

6 Answers 6


What you're referring to is known as speciation. In the context of two planets between which there is minimal gene flow, this is probably going to be allopatric speciation. Speciation is the process of a single species breaking into multiple species, which are generally defined as populations which cannot create viable offspring when breeding with one another.

Allopatric speciation is speciation that occurs due to geographic separation. This is seen on earth when something like a river valley separates a population of animals into two populations that can no longer reach each other. Chimpanzees and bonobos are one possible example. They do not differ significantly in terms of their environment, but their separation on either side of the Congo river has led to the formation of two different species.

In order for allopatric speciation to occur, there do not need to be any specific population pressures that force evolution of the two groups. Rather, it has been hypothesized that genetic drift is sufficient to cause the two groups to become reproductively incompatible given sufficient time.

A long period of separation is the critical factor, here. Over shorter periods of time, the two populations are likely to remain capable of producing healthy children, even if population pressures have changed the physiological traits of one of the populations. Corgis and German Shepards, for example, can still breed, despite the fact that they've evolved (with human help) to thrive in very different roles.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Do you have any estimation how many generations it takes until speciation occurs? $\endgroup$
    – Philipp
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 9:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Philipp: Well, wolves and dogs have almost achieved speciation, and that happened ~15,000 years ago. With 2-10 years between generations this is 1,500 to 7,500 generations. So that would be a first-order estimate. $\endgroup$
    – Charles
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 15:28
  • $\begingroup$ I would argue that dogs and wolves aren't close to speciation, and also aren't reproductively isolated from one another, as wolf-dog hybrids are still being produced on a regular basis and are reproductively fit (to my knowledge). In fish, allopatric speciation takse .8 - 2.4 million years. (uic.edu/classes/bios/bios101/Speciation2/sld030.htm). The LCA for Humans and Chimpanzees is around 5 million years, so definitely less than that. $\endgroup$
    – ckersch
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ I'd say around 1 million years would be a safe bet, but probably hundreds of thousands of there's significant evolutionary pressure driving gene change. $\endgroup$
    – ckersch
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 16:20

The first obstacle would be the ability to physically mate with each other. Modern astronauts face fairly serious muscle loss and atrophy after weeks in space, so humans living in space would be that much weaker. I'm doubtful that they would even survive visiting the 2G planet, let alone build the necessary blood pressure to perform the act.

The 'super-earth' humans would also have problems, if they were to meet the others in space. Not surprisingly, there has been quite a bit of speculation (and very little actual testing) about zero-G sex, and the consensus seems to be that it's very difficult. Basically, without gravity there is nothing to keep the participants together. One thrust and you're tumbling across the room. There is also apparently a blood flow issue, in which the human body, adapted for Earth's gravity, has trouble sustaining physical arousal. It would presumably be even harder (or ...not) for people adapted to higher gravity.

This also leads to a physical adaptation that could cause speciation, as natural selection would lead to the space-people to be better able to copulate in zero-G, which could eventually lead to substantial changes in the reproductive organs.

  • $\begingroup$ Re: "natural selection would lead to the space-people to be better able to copulate in zero-G": And since they're people with a space-faring level of technology, they would probably find other ways to help this process along! $\endgroup$
    – ruakh
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 21:15
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @ruakh Let's face it, since they're people, they would find ways to help the process along. $\endgroup$
    – KSmarts
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 21:20
  • $\begingroup$ Harnesses. Kinky little space buggers. $\endgroup$
    – Smithers
    Commented Dec 6, 2014 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ I just laughed out loud at work. Thanks for that, hahahaha. $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 19:50

It could be that our reproductive system doesn't work too well in zero gravity. That would impose a strong selection pressure to adapt the reproductive system to zero gravity, which then in turn might it incompatible with those living in a gravitational field.

The inability of cross-breeding would on one hand be a physical incompatibility, but the divergent evolution might also create a genetic incompatibility (for example, if the genes for the different reproductive organs are incompatible with each other).

In any case, something like this can only happen if the groups are not cross-breeding for a sufficiently long time (which may be reinforced by other adaptations to the respective environment which might make it impossible for the space dwellers people to even visit the planet surface, and at least inconvenient for planet dwellers to be in space).

  • $\begingroup$ Bone density differences could make it a very dangerous proposition. $\endgroup$
    – Aron
    Commented May 16, 2016 at 0:29

If we imagine the adaptations for the different lifestyles are based on genetic engineering ( which seems quite logical in a interplanetary civilisation ) then we could expect rapid changes which may be sufficient to cause effective speciation. Not being a biologist I don't know exactly where you reach the point that offspring are infertile, but if peoples are engineering themselves in the interests of fitting better in specific environments then they are likely to hit that boundary sooner or later.

Also people who engineer themselves to be able to live in space might take things to a much greater extent than one might expect, like the Ousters in Dan Simmons' Hyperion novels - the lack of gravity meaning that our limbs designed for ground travel might be significantly changed or discarded to make it easier to get around.

There could be an interesting debate among colonists at the speciation point, where you have a political question of whether they want to become a new species or not and that becomes a decision for all the colonists of the new world. A speciation referendum is a great starting point for interesting stories.


A scenario that might lead to this case might be genetic engineering followed by a loss of the technology.

The rationale is if you took a group of colonists and dropped them on a 2G world, they wouldn't survive. Our circulatory system, bones, and joints couldn't handle it. Our bodies would break. The fittest might survive for a while, but eventually the high gravity would kill everyone.

So to survive on the planet you'd probably need one of these:

  • Anti-Gravity technology to lower the gravity around the colony
  • Other advanced technology, perhaps mechanical exoskeletons and implanted devices that support the heart and lungs.

  • Genetic engineering, to modify the human body to make it more sturdy and to re-enforce the circulatory system. Perhaps supplemental organic hearts.

If you have the first or second, then infertility between the two branches of humanity wouldn't be an issue because there'd be no evolutionary pressure for humans to change. At least not for hundreds of thousands or millions of years.

If you have the 3rd, interbreeding would still be possible because of the high level of attainment in genetic engineering. They could just alter the genes as necessary.

So you'd have to have the genetic engineering that would make interbreeding impossible... but then lose that technology to prevent further engineering to make it possible.

On the flip side, the zero-G humans really have no reason to ever need to be zero-G humans. Rotating a space habitat can create 'artificial' gravity. And there's plenty of places in the universe where, even if at low G, there's enough gravity to prevent major health problems.

  • $\begingroup$ Actually 2G would probably be survivable. See worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/158/… $\endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 10:22
  • $\begingroup$ In that answer you said "So the immediate conclusion is that young healthy adults would survive. Everyone else is in trouble....". Evolution requires babies. If babies and children can't survive until they are old enough to reproduce, there will be no evolution. If medical science has non-genetic engineering ways to get them to survive, there will be minimal evolutionary pressure. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 17:21
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it's hard to know what the consequences of growing up in that environment would be - but even if only a few children from the first generation survive that sort of selective pressure will quickly lead to future generations that are better and better adapted. $\endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 20:26

Another aspect that no one has touched on is radiation: You will be exposed to radiation that people on Earth aren’t.

We can assume shielding and whatnot, and so you’ll still be able to live mostly cancer-free and make babies, but you will see mutations that Earth-people will simply not have.

Like others, keeping the population separate, having properties naturally selected for based on environmental changes, and difference in goals for genetic engineering will drive these changes. But the continuous difference in amount and composition of the radiation these space-people will endure will be the driving force behind the actual genome shuffling required to make Homo Aéronomie and Homo Sapiens incompatible.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .