24
$\begingroup$

Would that even be possible? Will the bones deform during early infancy? Will the cartilages between joints wear off faster? Will internal organs collapse under their own weight? I have no professional knowledge in this field so layman's terms will be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

  • $\begingroup$ Interesting idea... very similar to but not a dupe of Would the human body support living on planets with greater gravity than Earth? $\endgroup$ – JDSweetBeat Apr 27 '16 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ Haha, I asked the question literally for the same reason. Well, not quite. I was looking at possible exoplanets and most of them have around 2-4 Earth mass, hence the question. $\endgroup$ – hexpallett Apr 27 '16 at 17:56
  • $\begingroup$ Sounds like they might get compounds fractures on simple falls... $\endgroup$ – Serban Tanasa Apr 27 '16 at 19:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Huh, when I saw the title thought you meant growing a baby under a 4G signal... $\endgroup$ – Mehrdad Apr 28 '16 at 7:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given that you accepted an answer that does not have any citations or serious math, it would make sense to drop the hard-science tag and use science-based instead. $\endgroup$ – JDługosz Apr 27 '17 at 5:30
22
$\begingroup$

Maybe but problematic at best

but it will be tricky and complicated; more so than a 1G infant's development. if you have in-vitro fertilization or gene manipulation, you'll definitely want to do a little guided evolution to improve fitness.

The following assumes that these babies are the children of the first human colonists to a super-earth.

Surviving the first month

Let's start with breathing. Immediately after birth, the baby's first job is to start breathing and keep breathing. Let's assume that first breath happens. Very soon the baby will be laid on its back to be weighed. If the weight of the baby's rib cage and belly are greater than the strength of the diaphragm, the baby will have difficulty breathing or not be able to breath at all. If no breathing is possible at that gravity then artificial ventilation may be required which causes its own set of problems (infection, ventilator dependency).

Blood also weighs 3 to 4 times as much so the infant's heart may not be able to supply sufficient blood to the brain when lifted up under the armpits or cuddled head upwards. If this is true, then it's going to really mess with a lot of common infant care motions such as burping the baby over one's shoulder or holding up the baby to look into its eyes.

Assuming the usual nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere, there may be subtle oxygen deprivation effects from difficulty breathing or insufficient blood pressure to the brain. These effects may not show up till ages 2 to 3 when lots of important brain function such as language and motor skills develop.

At 13 to 15 weeks, the baby's bone start converting from cartilage to bone. Extra gravity might interfere with this process though I don't know enough cartilage->bone conversion to know if extra strong gravity will help or hurt this process.

Surviving the first year

Assuming that the infant can breath and isn't suffering from oxygen deprivation, moving around is going to be painful. While muscle growth may be higher than a 1g infant, the time required for this extra muscle development may delay crawling and walking. Any inter-relationships between motor skill development and language or between any other skill sets, may be hurt by this delay in development.

Hemophiliac children that bruise easily will be in constant pain from the trips, falls and bumps inherent in learning to crawl or walk. Regular children will suffer more too as they will land 3 to 4 times more heavily than a baby on Earth. Bruising will be common. Broken bones are likely to be common too.

Parents and children will have to find a way to build physical bonds other than by carrying. A 10kg child under 3Gs weighs 30kg. Babies are heavy enough already under 1g. Attempting to carry 30kg plus the parent's body weight all day just isn't feasible.

High protein intake to support muscle growth for these children will be crucial.

Surviving the first decade

Assuming the baby can learn to walk and develops enough muscle/bone strength to move about, then my guess is that development will be somewhat normal though stockier builds will dominate over thinner builds.

Experiment Design

What if you want to find out now? All mammals share the same bone creation process. Mice and rats are well understood human models though for the following I'm going to assume that they are human bone proxies but I don't know for sure.

Take a population of mice and rats. Divide them into the experiment and control groups. Make experiment groups for 1.5g, 2g, 3g and 4g. Put the experimental group into cages on a centrifuge to their set gravity level. To test just the development of the mouse pups, introduce them and their mother into the centrifuge shortly after birth. Special considerations will need to be made for food and water. Run the centrifuge 24 hours a day, pausing only for examinations and regular cage maintenance. Abort the test if the mother is unable to move under that gravity level. If the mother can't move then any kind of care required for the mouse pup to survive won't happen.

Mice mature in 4 to 8 weeks, so it shouldn't be difficult to see what happens under different degrees of gravity.

$\endgroup$

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Supposing you did try the centrifuge experiment with rats, how large would the centrifuge need to be to avoid disorienting/nauseating effects in the rats from effecting your development study? Also, smaller animals will naturally be less effected by the extra gravity, as it's a smaller force relative to say fluid resistance when pumping blood than in larger animals, representing a smaller portion of effort/strength/calories relative to the other forces the animal may encounter. $\endgroup$ – wedstrom Apr 27 '16 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ @wedstrom, the centrifuge may only need to be 1 or 2 meters wide to accommodate two cages. I consider it prohibitively expensive to build a centrifuge sufficiently large to work with entire racks or multiple racks worth of mice/rats....though if your research institution has the money, go for it. $\endgroup$ – Green Apr 27 '16 at 20:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'd expect a stronger heart and diaphragm at birth. Overall, stronger collagen or more collagen. Definitely more muscle. You can't change the baby's shape too much or you run into having to rework how females carry and deliver babies. Human babies are the way they are because of the development time required to get to adulthood. If you want a more precocious infant, you'll need to spend more time in the womb or somehow accelerate childhood development. But, at that point, you're pushing what it means to be human. $\endgroup$ – Green Apr 27 '16 at 21:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Helmstif, other Sci-fi authors have posited that humans who grow up in heavier gravities will look more blocky, more muscular. This makes sense. An extreme example is the elephant which is all pillars and arches to support the extra bulk. Conversely, a small bird can get away with relatively thin bones and no pillar structures. $\endgroup$ – Green Apr 27 '16 at 21:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As for the breathing....would air pressure play a factor? Under 4x gravity, air pressure would increase, so if the baby could breathe, I'd imagine that air pressure inside the lungs could provide some stabilization....making surviving the first month a bit easier. $\endgroup$ – jedd.ahyoung Apr 28 '16 at 1:53
7
$\begingroup$

Since there is no previous scientific research on this subject, so I wonder if it is possible to answer your question under the strict rules of hard science. However, here are some facts and figures that are very relevant to your query and you should be able to get very close to the reality if you add in some research of your own on this matter.

A cubic inch of bone can in principle bear a load of 19,000 lbs. (8,626 kg) or more — roughly the weight of five standard pickup trucks — making it about four times as strong as concrete. Still, whether or not bone actually withstands such loads depends heavily on how quickly force is delivered. (LiveScience Article)

Which enables fighter jet pilots to cope with crushing levels of angular acceleration during steep twists and turns.

However, infants and babies do not have the same thickness of bones. Or even the same material. Adults have bones based primarily on calcium and phosphorus and are more or less rigid and inflexible. On the contrary, babies are born with very little calcium and phosphorous based solid bones and most of their bones are made of cartilage. These bones fuse together in a few years and gradually become the hard, inflexible bones of adults. Find more information here and here.

The bone density and material of an infant's bones are most certainly not capable of developing naturally under constant (or probably even occasional) 3-4G gravity exposure.

However, by using special "free floating" baby chambers, you might be able to get the baby's bones develop in the right direction. But the bone density would be much, much more in such an adult than a "normal" Earthly adult.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would think that the flexibility, rather than strength, of the infant's bones would actually adapt quite well to the G forces. I would worry more about cardiovascular strength and circulation or growth problems than bones not being physically strong enough. $\endgroup$ – wedstrom Apr 27 '16 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ Bones are certainly a consideration, but let's not forget everything else! $\endgroup$ – Lamar Latrell Apr 27 '16 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ @LamarLatrell: When the basic fabric of skeleton isn't able to support the structure under such high force, it is of little importance how other weaknesses would bring the poor kid down. As in, when the victim is already dead/disabled for one reason, you don't have to look for other lethal factors. $\endgroup$ – Youstay Igo Apr 27 '16 at 21:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Youstay Igo. True, but the same could be said about x and y factors with respect to an unconsidered case of bones. Just saying there is potential interest in these other factors, just as much as the case of bones :) $\endgroup$ – Lamar Latrell Apr 27 '16 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ @LamarLatrell: Point! That is indeed correct. Just that I hit upon the bones idea first and found it to be sufficient. Yes, someone researching on circulatory and/or muscular structure would find those factors to be self sufficient in their own right. $\endgroup$ – Youstay Igo Apr 28 '16 at 6:51
3
$\begingroup$

The best way to answer the skeletal issues is to look at the effects of morbid obesity.

There are many obese adults who are triple their ideal body weight. It's certainly possible to get around at that weight, though it does limit what they can do. Some of them manage to lose weight and have few lasting effects apart from loose skin, though there is considerable strain on the joints, which may or may not result in irreversible damage.

As far as childhood obesity goes: googling Jessica Leonard (400lbs at age 7) or Lu hao shows that both have bow legs as a result of childhood obesity, so a child raised in 3-4G would have the same issues.

I don't think breathing would be a huge issue, it seems possible for morbidly obese patients, though the comparison is not a direct one. In addition to the weight on their diaphragms, it is known that the abdominal cavity fills with fat, putting pressure on the lungs, which wouldn't be an issue for someone of normal mass raised under high G. The other issue suffered by morbidly obese patients is sleep apnea, caused by obstruction of the windpipe by excess fat in the neck area. Again this should not be directly applicable to normal mass persons under high G.


The issue of blood pressure is significant though. normal blood pressure is 120mm over 80mm (mm mercury at the highest and lowest points of the pulse cycle.) Mercury is 13.5 times denser than water, so it would be 1620mm over 1080mm of water or blood at normal G. On increasing the G, the heart simply won't be able to pump blood up to the head (at 4G this becomes 420mm over 270mm) so people will black out on standing. A stronger heart isn't a solution, as blood vessels would need to be strengthened as well, to say nothing of the return flow from the legs. People are not going to be able to stand for long without blacking out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-force gives some interesting data and confirms that humans tolerate high G poorly in an upright position. They tolerate it best when lying on their back.

$\endgroup$

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

1
$\begingroup$

I don't think a baby could survive under constant 3-4G in an otherwise normal environment. However, many groups consider water births very beneficial. Perhaps this could be extended to long sessions in a pool, sleeping underwater, or even raising the baby under water until it can walk. If the problem of how to breath can be solved - with respirators, intubation, or breathing a liquid - many of the dangers of high g's could be greatly reduced.

Research into artificial amniotic fluid and/or liquids with precise density-gradients would allow for crawling and walking with a nearly normal weight on the bottom. Doctors could monitor bone and muscle development and move the infant to different environments as needed.

$\endgroup$

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.