3
$\begingroup$

So I'm brainstorming a new magic system where each form of magic is specialized yet very versatile; however they require extremely in-depth knowledge on a particular multi-disciplinary branch of science, philosophy, math, arts and what-have-you. I don't really want to go too much into the magic system, because that's not the point of this question and I plan to ask further questions about it later.

Examples:

  • Limited Time Control: allows one to rearrange their own flow through the temporal dimension; requires theoretical physics.
  • Hard Light: allows manipulation of light, and can be used to make lightsabers or "teleport"; requires knowledge in physics and photometry.
  • Sound Amplifier: allows manipulation and projection of energy as sound, and allows petrification and shattering; requires physics and acoustics.

I'm interested in knowing how many disciplines, including science and languages, a single human could become "fluent" in, such that they have at least a MA, and then a Ph. D. I'd like to know in regards to:

  1. Pure brain/neurological power.
  2. How much time, in hours and age, it would take to become fluent in x disciplines.
  3. Plausibility assuming the person has an average 8-5-ish job with plenty of vacation and sick time and will live to 100.
$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by a CVn, Gianluca, Jaywalker, Hohmannfan, Green Apr 21 '16 at 12:40

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You might want to nail down "fluent" to some qualification equivalent? I'm guessing Master's degree level in a specific subject. And obviously there would be some cross-over between similar subjects. In real life, it might be easier to extend a Physics or Engineering undergraduate degree with multiple physics-related Masters courses than to extend them with subjects which share less of the fundamentals (e.g. organic chemistry, computer science). $\endgroup$ – Neil Slater Apr 21 '16 at 8:49
  • $\begingroup$ I added MA and Ph. D. Is that satisfactory or should I specify more? $\endgroup$ – Justin Alexander Apr 21 '16 at 8:55
  • $\begingroup$ @JustinAlexander: That works for me, and gives a ballpark figure - answers can be based on real-world times for gaining those qualifications. MA/PhD still gives a lot flexibility - but then of course your world could have people who are better/worse at magic, depending on the relative quality of their understanding. $\endgroup$ – Neil Slater Apr 21 '16 at 9:49
  • $\begingroup$ @NeilSlater Yup, that's exactly what I'm going for. $\endgroup$ – Justin Alexander Apr 21 '16 at 10:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JustinAlexander, I like the question that you're trying to address but it's just too broad. I started to write an answer and got bogged down in examples where "minimum competency" takes a decade to acquire, as in medicine, but in architecture or engineering minimum competency comes in just 4 years of general study. The variation is just too great across disciplines without considering the intellectual capacity of an "average human". $\endgroup$ – Green Apr 21 '16 at 12:43