Background Information:

252 million years ago, Siberia erupted, releasing enough lava to fill in a volume anywhere between one and four million cubic kilometers. Any time someone thinks "large igneous province", the Siberian Traps seem to be the first thing on his mind.

But the actual largest igneous province is the Ontong Java-Manihiki-Hikurangi Plateau in the depths of the Pacific Ocean. It erupted over 120 million years ago and released enough lava to fill in a volume anywhere between 59 and 77 million cubic kilometers.


I am working on an earth-like planet with somewhat alternate history and I want to make a volcanic eruption on land (like the Siberian Traps) with a lava output equaling to that of Ontong-Java underwater eruption.


What necessary changes must I make in my world (with emphasis on geology and geography related changes) that would allow me to make a land-based volcanic action spew as much lava as the benthic eruption of Ontong-Java (59-77 million cubic km)?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @cobaltduck Just because a question might fit well in another exchange doesn't mean that it shouldn't be asked here. If OP didn't know about that exchange and wants to move it over there then fine, but if the question fits in worldbuilding then it belongs here too :) $\endgroup$ – AndyD273 Mar 8 '16 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ That being said, any question where the answer is "sure, if there is enough magma underground, why not?" probably doesn't have enough constraints to make it a good worldbuilding question. My only thought is that the one in the ocean has a lot of water pressing down, which may lead to more lava being forced out, while the one in Siberia doesn't have that. I don't know enough to say it really works that way though. $\endgroup$ – AndyD273 Mar 8 '16 at 17:03
  • $\begingroup$ There. Just reworded your question to make it precise and relevant to worldbuilding process :) Hope it helps. $\endgroup$ – Youstay Igo Mar 8 '16 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ That would confuse people into thinking that it's MY handwriting. $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Mar 8 '16 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ @cobaltduck Earth Science Stack Exchange is not interested in speculative scenarios. $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Mar 8 '16 at 17:51

At first blush, an eruption in an ocean basin is a lot easier:

  • Thinner crust.
  • Lower lifting forces -- You don't have to push it up as far.
  • Buoyancy of water further decreases required force by about 40% (figgering basalt at s.g. 2.5

I grew up on the western edge of the central Washington flood basalts. And flood is the right descriptor. Very flat layers 10 to 80 feet thick.

I would expect some response similar to the way the crust rises and sinks at the end/beginning of an ice age. Since basalt and granite are similar in density, (basalt slightly heavier) you'd get something very similar to our existing igneous provinces except larger in scale. I don't think you could get an Olympus Mons here on Earth.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ So even if this eruption happened at a far younger date, it'd still be too thin to survive glacial advance? $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Mar 8 '16 at 22:15

As the previous answer said, it would be much harder to get that amount of magma on a terrestrial surface.

But if it did, well...there's be very little left of life on Earth, if any. The Siberian traps devastated life and wasn't far from wiping out tetrapods. Something almost 20 times bigger is almost impossible to think about. I guess some animal could survive, but it would take likely till the present day, if not longer for biodiversity to recover (assuming it starts the same date as otl).

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.