In Halo, there are large mechanized suits called Mantises. These are heavily armed and bipedal (kind of like the the AT-ST). There is no doubt that they can be built, but why would they? What would the advantages be of a bipedal mech suit?


3 Answers 3


The page you linked says that they're about 5.7 meters (18.8 feet) tall. My immediate thought is that this height advantage should be used. The operator of the drone would need to use it to face enemies that are pretty big.

Potential victims:

  • Large aliens that could rip a human in half
  • Large military/armored vehicles
  • Other large mech suits
  • Large animals (maybe we're waging a war on elephants)

A human - even a heavily armed one - would have problems taking one of these enemies down. A mech suit would have it easier.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ A tank would have it even easier, and would cost probably less. $\endgroup$
    – vsz
    Feb 3, 2016 at 5:40
  • $\begingroup$ @vsz For a tank you need a driver, a gunner, a loader and a tank commander, while a mech can be oprated by a single person. $\endgroup$
    – Hexaholic
    Feb 3, 2016 at 11:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Hexaholic The amount of automation required for a mech to be operated by a single person could just as easily be applied to a tank (probably easier, in fact). $\endgroup$
    – JAB
    Sep 15, 2016 at 19:54

Mech suites are great, but bipeds are a bit iffy

Three reasons why:

  • Use tools built for humans: A human shaped mech suite with human shaped hands would not require redesigning tools or weapons for the mech to be able to wield or use
  • Intuitive to operate for complex actions: Human drivers have years of experience operating human shaped bodies so it would be more simple to teach them how to do very complex moves in a biped.
  • Move through human shaped spaces: The stairs, doors and ladders of our world are shaped for easy use by humans, not mechs on tank treads maybe the need to move in human shaped spaces is enough.

Why not:

  • Bipeds are slow: The record speed of mechanical or organic bipeds is 60 mph, the current record speed for wheeled vehicles is 763.035 mph. You are 10 times slower for being a biped.
  • Bipeds are unstable: A quadruped or a hexapod can walk in a statically stable manner. If frozen at any time it would be balanced and upright. A biped must be constantly leaning or stepping to keep balance. For examples, look at the recent DARPA robotics competition.
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why are those the max speeds? Can you give references? Ostriches can supposedly run 43mph. Also, is comparing a biped to a wheeled vehicle relevant? They are really very different things. $\endgroup$
    – rooby
    Feb 2, 2016 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ I had the wrong number 28.3 is the current record speed of a mechanical quadruped the cheetah, youtube.com/watch?v=chPanW0QWhA. The animal cheetah is 75 mph and ostrich is 43 mph. The current record for wheeled vehicle from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_speed_record is 760 mph for wheeled and 403 for wheel driven. I will edit its a factor of ten not thirty. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2016 at 0:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't think MaxSpeed really applies. If I want to compare the speed of a War-Mech, I don't use a racing car, I use a tank (or ATV, or ...). Despite from that, tanks are still fast. $\endgroup$
    – JFBM
    Feb 3, 2016 at 7:50
  • $\begingroup$ Speed comparison here is a bit flawed here, because it doesn't account for the terrain. On a street a wheeled vehicle is, without doubt, much faster, but there is a reason why tanks and other armoured vehicles are rarely used in mountainous terrain for example. $\endgroup$
    – Bounce
    Feb 3, 2016 at 10:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Bounce even on rough terrain bipeds are slower than quadrupeds. A mountain goat out runs a human, a cheetah out runs an ostrich. You could design terrain that is only traversable by bipeds (think a ladder in a small vertical shaft) But that is what I was talking about in the point on human shaped spaces. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2016 at 18:11

The number one answer is they would be super cool especially in animation.

Another reason would be fast movement over unpaved terrain. Obviously, our tech is not there but if you wanted to get up and over bombed out buildings and what not being able to climb over them would be a boon. A better design for this would include hands or be a goat-bot. If the desire was to Run Ostrich style across broken roads guns a blazing the mech shown could be a solution.

But looking cool would be the best reason.

  • $\begingroup$ "looking cool would be the best reason." Yep. But this doesn't necessarily make it irrelevant to battle. The psychological effect of your weapon on the enemy is important. $\endgroup$
    – user16107
    Feb 3, 2016 at 10:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Aw shet, they brought the Deathstalker mechs out again. We gotta get out of here!" $\endgroup$ Dec 2, 2017 at 21:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .