9
$\begingroup$

If the force of gravity at the Earth's surface suddenly became 2 times stronger, how would the environment and humans cope? I'm guessing a lot of flying creatures would suffer, but what would happen to us?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If gravity everywhere became twice as strong, the Earth's orbit would become unstable, and it would rapidly spiral into the Sun and burn up. (Other astronomical effects are left as an exercise to the reader.) I'm guessing you mean something happens to make the gravitational pull at the Earth's surface twice as great as it is now? $\endgroup$ – Royal Canadian Bandit Oct 29 '14 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ @RoyalCanadianBandit sure, you should put a answer on, you seem to know a bit $\endgroup$ – CrazySlayaNinjaBear Oct 29 '14 at 11:14
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks -- I think Tim B's answer (plus my comments) is OK -- but I've edited the question for greater clarity. $\endgroup$ – Royal Canadian Bandit Oct 29 '14 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ LifeNoggin has a video on this. $\endgroup$ – Schwern Mar 5 '16 at 19:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I haven't calculated this, but I believe in an interesting piece of irony, light but rigid objects close to the weight of air may now find it easier to float! (Water might be a better example as it's easier to find near-floating rigid objects). My logic is that a kg (in mass) of atmosphere would increase in weight by the exact same proportion as everything else. But it would also be compressed and so would also be more dense. Its buoyancy would increase by both its weight and density and therefore help light objects that can maintain their "old" densities to float! $\endgroup$ – colmde Apr 6 '16 at 17:22
10
$\begingroup$

Every flying machine or creature would crash immediately and probably fatally.

Anyone with a weak heart, bones, or who is overweight would die fairly rapidly.

All structures such as bridges and large buildings would become potentially unsafe, depending on the safety margin with which they are constructed. Houses would probably stand but may need reinforcing, larger structures are at higher risk.

For details of the effects on humans see this answer: https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/a/171/49

As mentioned in the comments plants would struggle to support their weight, trees would collapse. Grain crops would not be able to stand. Many other plants would need artificial support such as tying them to frames to support them.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Experiments in centrifuges have shown that humans can tolerate 2G (2 times Earth's gravity) for up to 22 hours with no major ill effects. The long-term health effects are unknown but potentially serious. One major environmental effect: Grain crops (wheat, barley, rice) would immediately collapse under their own weight and die off, causing massive food shortages. $\endgroup$ – Royal Canadian Bandit Oct 29 '14 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ @RoyalCanadianBandit Excellent point, trees would struggle too. I've added a paragraph. $\endgroup$ – Tim B Oct 29 '14 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ I'm curious if any species would even be able to reproduce...would a human embryo (zygote) even be able to divide properly under heavier gravity? I'm not sure what research has been done there $\endgroup$ – Twelfth Oct 29 '14 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Twelfth I doubt it's been studied, considering they are suspended in liquid though I doubt the effects would be severe. No way to be sure without trying it though... $\endgroup$ – Tim B Oct 29 '14 at 19:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Depending on design and construction, most dams would be in danger of collapse, as the hydrostatic pressure on the face would double. Many mountains, such as the San Bernadino, would suffer catastrophic mud slides with the first heavy rain, as the increased gravity would change the angle of repose. $\endgroup$ – WhatRoughBeast Jun 17 '15 at 4:11
3
$\begingroup$

Depends on how it happens. There's three ways to double the gravity of Earth.

1. Increase the gravitational constant.

As Q said, "simple, change the Gravitational constant of the Universe". This is bad. Very bad. The Earth becomes more compact under its own increased weight and heats up. The Moon spirals into the Earth. The Earth and all the planets spiral into the Sun. Galaxies are disrupted... basically the whole Universe changes.

Let's not do that.

2. Double the radius of the Earth.

If you double the radius of the Earth, adding mass while keeping the density constant, it will have eight times the volume, and thus eight times the mass. But because the radius doubled, and because gravity decreases with the square of the distance, there will only be twice the gravity at the surface.

But this changes the surface which adds another change to deal with, so let's skip this one, too.

3. Double the density of the Earth.

If we double the mass while keeping the size the same we'll double the density, maybe by adding a lot more heavy elements below the surface. Because the size of the Earth is the same, and because gravity increases linearly with mass, gravity will double.

This is the best option because the surface remains the same... at first. Let's go with this one.


Our new, more dense Earth has problems, and not just for life.

For people, everyone will feel like they're giving themselves a piggy back ride. For those who can handle the strain, they will eventually gain in muscle and bone mass to compensate somewhat, but until then it will be an exhausting struggle to move or even breathe. Anyone too old, too young, or too sickly will likely be bedridden or die.

In addition to simply moving your greater bulk, your bodily processes become more difficult. Your lungs must expand and contract against greater mass, breathing becomes harder. Your heart must work harder against the increased gravity to get blood up to your brain, the increased blood pressure will put strain on your heart and blood vessels. Your lymphatic system, part of your immune system, is pumped by the action of your muscles and its fluids will tend to pool in your legs. There will be tremendous long term health consequences.

Most bridges and many tall buildings will fail. They are not built with a sufficient factor of safety to withstand doubling their weight. Airplanes will likely crash from either the increased weight, or the sudden atmospheric contraction (see below). Tall trees will either fall or quickly die from being unable to pump water to their tops, new trees will be much shorter. Many shorter plants won't have the structure to handle the increased weight and will be flattened.

Geological structures will collapse above, and more importantly, underground. Mines and other underground structures will collapse causing great sinkholes to open up. Cities are built on great systems of utility tunnels which will collapse. Others, built on poor soil and reclaimed land, will sink into the mire.

The increased mass means satellites in orbit will come crashing down. New launches will be harder, they have to with an escape velocity 1.4 times higher (escape velocity increases with the square root of gravity). But space will be closer! See below.


Double the mass means double the air pressure. Fortunately your body will reach equilibrium, so it won't make breathing harder. And you'll be receiving more oxygen, which is good news for all that extra work you need to do to move your new bulk around.

For anything moving quickly through the atmosphere, the increased air density will mean increased drag. Cars will be slower and less fuel efficient. Airplanes, on the other hand, will have greater lift and lower stall speeds.

A compressed atmosphere effects space launches... after all the satellites come crashing down. New launches will have to move through a denser atmosphere, which is bad, but the compressed atmosphere means the edge of space is lower. A compressed atmosphere means less drag on satellites which means they can stay aloft longer in closer orbits using less fuel... once they get there.

But human civilization probably won't survive on this new Earth...


The increased density has long term consequences for the Earth's habitability. All this extra gravitational energy means a hotter and more active Earth, this is bad for humanity.

The rapid compression of the atmosphere will cause a tremendous heating. This will generate great wind storms, pushing around more air mass, and strange weather patterns for years to come. It gets worse.

The increased density of heavy metals means a greater portion of radioactivity heating the core of the Earth. This means more seismic activity, more volcanoes, and more earthquakes in the long term. And it gets worse.

The increased gravity will cause the Earth itself to settle and compress adding even more heat. As the Earth shrinks, even a little bit, the surface will buckle causing great upheavals; new mountain ranges and volcanic eruptions will appear. All this mass shifting around will cause great earthquakes.


In the end, we're left with a slightly smaller Earth which is hotter and more geologically active. This means an unstable surface which is hostile to human civilization, much of which just collapsed under its own weight anyway.

Life on Earth is in trouble. Evolution has built on the assumption that gravity is a constant. Billions of tiny, critical biological processes have been built with that assumption. Now that it's suddenly changed, most complex life will die. The Earth will experience a great extinction event as it does every 100 million years or so. This will open great gaps in the biological niches, gaps which have not been open since multi-cellular life began, which will be filled by new forms of life. A few million years after this event, life on Earth will look very, very different.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I suspect the evolutionary effects of the OP's scenario will be more like the Great Oxygenation Event than it will be like the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event. $\endgroup$ – a CVn Dec 11 '16 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, and very few satellites attain Earth escape velocity (and most that do we call "probes", not satellites). Most satellites remain in Earth-centric orbits, which require their velocity to be less than escape velocity. Doubling the effective gravity of the Earth would obviously be a bad thing for many spacecraft (both satellites, probes and others); they would end up in very different orbits, many of which are likely to intersect the atmosphere or even the ground. Lithobraking tends to be bad for a spacecraft's structural integrity. $\endgroup$ – a CVn Dec 11 '16 at 12:08
0
$\begingroup$

Trees might not grow straight up because even though they grow towards the sun using the rays to make their own food the gravitational force would pull even harder on the trunk causing it to bend towards the point where gravity is strongest

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.