12
$\begingroup$

Assume you're in a world where you can increase your strength with magic and you can get a bow with enough resistance that you can shoot arrows at a supersonic speed.

How strong would the person need to be to wield it? How many pounds of force would they have to be able to apply?

Also, is there another way using not magic but physics to allow a bow to shoot supersonic arrows (beside having insane resistance and resilience)?

Lastly, does a supersonic arrow have any advantages over a supersonic bullet?

Edit: So, it seems that supersonic arrows aren't that great. Are there any range weapons what when combined with super strength would make it as good as a gun?

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ A regular (but high draw, possibly steel) bow with a very heavy arrow. Essentially convert your super-strength individual into a ballista and go from there! $\endgroup$ – Joe Bloggs Dec 21 '15 at 9:43
  • $\begingroup$ @JoeBloggs but would the damage done by such a arrow do more damage than a bullet? Cause I want guns in my world and I'm trying to figure out does it make sense for people to use other weapons. $\endgroup$ – user1804234 Dec 21 '15 at 18:36
  • $\begingroup$ Depends on the bullet, the kind of gun and the strength of the person, but I'd say you could make it comparable. Certainly more useful against armoured targets (a properly designed arrow could go through Kevlar as it wouldn't deform on impact), and less pain to manufacture (you just need someone that can cast steel, no theoretical metamaterials required). It would be shorter range than a gun, but so would any bow! $\endgroup$ – Joe Bloggs Dec 22 '15 at 9:00
  • $\begingroup$ Just make sure you don't go near the speed of light $\endgroup$ – Möoz Mar 18 '16 at 4:26
  • $\begingroup$ Use a sling to throw supersonic rocks. That would work wonders and would be way easier to build than this bow. $\endgroup$ – T. Sar Mar 10 '17 at 15:54
14
$\begingroup$

You're going to find a lot of physics gets in the way.

The most important detail will be that arrows bend while being fired. Because all of the propulsion is coming from the back of the arrow, the arrow is naturally unstable during firing. This is something archers are aware of at normal archery speeds. However, you will need to break the sound barrier while the arrow is still under power, so you'll need a lot of power in this unstable time.

Let's pretend your arrow is made of unobtanium, and is rigid enough. Let's also pretend your bow has a good enough "dry shot" velocity to accelerate anything to those speeds (which I think may be reasonable, with enough clever geometry). A reasonable mass arrow is around 200 grains (13 grams). In the interest of approximations, let's round down to 10grams, or 0.01kg to make the math easier. The draw length of an average bow might be around 0.75m. We can do the calculations to see how much energy an arrow has to have at the sound barrier: 340 m/s, and then use that to figure out how much force is needed to do that work over the draw length. E=1/2mv^2 = 578J. F=W/d = 770N. That's roughly 175 pounds of draw strength, to accelerate the arrow with no air friction or anything.

That's about triple the strength of a human right now. However it fails to take into account a lot of things, least of all being the inefficiency of the bow near the speed of sound (you're basically going to have to make the string into a bull whip).

However, that's just to get to the speed of sound. The drag of a projectile at supersonic speeds is quite high, about three times higher than you'd expect for a well designed projectile. Consider that a 9mm bullet is supersonic when it comes out of the barrel, but rapidly slows to subsonic. You would actually have to accelerate the arrow to a much higher speed to remain supersonic in flight. Trying to fire at mach 2 would require 4x the force.

All of that presumes access to an unobtanium shaft that can take the stress of launching, a carefully constructed bow with pulls quite stronger than any human can handle, and probably ignores a half a dozen limitations that appear in the transonic region that I am simply not accounting for.

The arrow shafts seem like the most difficult part to solve. Modern archers pay top dollar for ultra-exotic composite arrow shafts to minimize flex at human speeds. The material requirements for that arrow shaft supersonic may simply be outside the realm of known materials.

Want to shoot an arrow supersonic without these problems? Try a sabot. You can use them to basically put a sharp small object (like an arrow) into a gun. The sabot holds the shape as the explosives project the entire construct out of the barrel. Then the sabot falls away and lets the sharp thing fly.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The sabot doesn't really help cause, it not that I really want to shoot a super sonic arrow. I'm trying to figure out what kinda projectile weapon can someone with super strength use that is as powerful as a gun. $\endgroup$ – user1804234 Dec 20 '15 at 18:05
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @user1804234 Couldn't s/he just throw a rock? $\endgroup$ – Frostfyre Dec 20 '15 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Frostfyre How strong would someone need to be that just throwing something would be better that shooting someone? $\endgroup$ – user1804234 Dec 20 '15 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ @user1804234 Projectile weapons are simply force multipliers. If someone with a bow can exert the same amount of force as someone with super strength, then a rock is effectively just as effective in the hands of the one with super strength as the bow is in the hands of the normal. $\endgroup$ – Frostfyre Dec 20 '15 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ What if you build a bow with a track the arrow rides in to hold it straight during that boost phase? $\endgroup$ – Loren Pechtel Dec 20 '15 at 23:04
5
$\begingroup$

Not really on answer, but you should give up on this idea. In all cases if your strength and the resistance of bow go up, it is better to add mass to the arrow than to make it supersonic. So a situation where someone would build a supersonic bow does not really exist. (With magic it could happen by accident, of course.)

This is because energy losses to drag and mechanical resistance will rise rapidly when the speed is increased. Traditional bows and arrows are meant for subsonic speeds so their base drag and resistance from the basic design is fairly high. If you accelerate it to supersonic, you'll get lots of wasted energy. Basically I am talking about the bowstring and the arms having large surface area and relatively bad aerodynamic shape. The ratio of the mass of arrow to the mass of the moving parts of the bow is also important.

Thus while it is actually fairly simple to calculate the force needed in ideal case, I didn't actually do the math because the actual force needed would be dominated by the mechanical and aerodynamic losses which would be difficult to even estimate without an actual bow with known design and materials.

Note that the same rapid increase of drag applies to the arrow afterwards as well. So for the same energy a subsonic arrow with more mass will fly farther and penetrate deeper on impact. In theory supersonic arrow would be more accurate, but in practice that would require the arrows to be precision manufactured from metal. Traditional arrow construction is not optimized for supersonic flight. Modern arrows might be more practical with more precise construction and higher quality materials.

A crossbow can be made very strong with pulleys or cranks to amplify strength. There is nothing stopping you from making it strong enough to propel the bolt supersonic. Except the fact that it would be even more inefficient than magical supersonic bow due to the added mechanics adding their own losses. And you can add the same mechanics to a bow if a crossbow is a no go. It just isn't particularly sensible, since the crossbow construction is more convenient for difficult to load cases.

A supersonic arrow (designed to be supersonic, not just normal arrow going fast) has better mass to drag and mass to front area ratios. Or said simply larger aspect ratio. Larger aspect ratio may result in higher range, better accuracy, and better armour penetration.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This. If you have a massive and dense arrow and an extremely high draw strength bow (possibly a steel bow), then you essentially turn the bow wielder into a siege weapon. Where a supersonic arrow might not be much use a steel tipped lead bolt would wreak all manner of havoc. $\endgroup$ – Joe Bloggs Dec 21 '15 at 9:41
4
$\begingroup$

You've asked for ranged weapons which are alternatives to a bow and arrow where super-human strength would make the weapon more potent.

I would suggest the following:

Most of these may strike the same problems of material strength pointed out by other answers when extreme (supersonic) use is required.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Seconding the sling. While they require an insane amount of training to use with a lot of accuracy, a normal human with a few years' training can propel a rock from a string at frankly unbelievable speeds and hit within the general area. A superhuman would (assuming stronger material) be able to fling (a) much heavier loads and (b) much farther, as well as being able to use a longer sling which makes it that much more powerful. I'm not sure about the aerodynamics of trying to make it go supersonic, though; to my knowledge, that has yet to be done. $\endgroup$ – Nic Hartley Dec 21 '15 at 12:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.