# Polar Solar: A world on its side

I am working on a world and I have run into a minor roadblock. The world is altered such that one of its polar regions is constantly facing the sun and the other is always facing away. I figure that the world would have an axial tilt of somewhere around fifteen to twenty degrees. Now here is where things get odd. I would like the constantly sunlit lands to be heavy jungle, and not the desert I am fairly certain is most likely. How would I go about getting that result with the world as described? Is it even possible? Do I need to resort to magic or some other hand-waving to make it work?

• This may just depend on what you want on the other side of the planet. If that side is incredibly cold but sufficiently wet, it should be fine, you just need the right distance/atmosphere. – DaaaahWhoosh Dec 7 '15 at 17:02
• The earth has an axis tilt of 23 degrees, so a tilt of 15 to 20 wouldn't necessarily do what you want. Is it also tidally locked so that one face is always toward the sun? Maybe More like Uranus and have a tilt of 90 degrees, which goes around the sun like a rolling ball? – AndyD273 Dec 7 '15 at 17:03
• How do you keep the pole facing the sun? I've posted that in the past and not figured it out. Your mention of axial tilt contradicts the premise though, so I don't follow. – JDługosz Dec 7 '15 at 17:12
• @JDĹ‚ugosz The core is made of handwavium? The only thing I can think of is that the planet is slowly tumbling (rotating on more than one axis, because of an early collision maybe) in such a way that one side faces the sun. It would be a lot easier to just have the planet be normal with very little tilt, and be tidally locked, since you'd have one face always lit, and one always dark. I do remember reading that the earths rotation is slowing, and some day could become tidally locked, so it's possible. I don't really see much advantage to having it be the pole that's always lit vs the equator. – AndyD273 Dec 7 '15 at 17:37
• While the Earth is indeed slowing its rotation due to tidal drag from the moon, it is still expected to be spinning under the sun either engulfs it or just bakes it when it expands. – Gary Walker Dec 7 '15 at 19:29

Make the sunward side not a pole.

You can't have a planet rotating on an axis that always points at the star, there isn't anything in orbital mechanics to allow that. However, there isn't really a difference between having the planet simply be tidally locked and the impossible situation you've asked about. The primary difference is that a person standing on the surface won't see the sun circle the sky. In either case there is no day/night cycle, the sunward side is always lit and warm and the anti-sunward side is always cold and dark (unless you've got a moon to light it up).

The average temperature can be selected by correctly choosing the distance from the star. The climate for the sunward side can be jungle if geography and atmospheric conditions are correct. It's an entirely plausible premise.

A tidally locked planet also does not need to lack seasons. It can still have the precession that causes seasons on Earth, that is, the planet could present librations relative to its star. For instance, our moon is tidally locked to Earth, but presents librations (the slight rocking see in the animation below, but without the day/night cycle). This might give your planet a seasonal light/dark cycle, but you can play with that parameter as you like.

• Given that there is wobble in the Earth's rotational axis, I can imagine a scenario where the wobble is large enough and fast enough to coincide with the planet's orbital speed. The axis of rotation might not point directly at the sun, but it could come close. – Draco18s no longer trusts SE Dec 7 '15 at 19:04
• @Draco18s The planet would need to be highly non-spherical, rotate unbelievably fast (which would help cause it to not be a perfect sphere), or have some other really bizarre mechanism to allow for the precession to match the year for any significant amount of time. – Samuel Dec 7 '15 at 19:16
• If the planet very very far from the sun to make a very slow orbit, and had a large moon to drive the precession it would help to explain precession cycle matching the orbit cycle. – Gary Walker Dec 7 '15 at 19:41
• @GaryWalker Very very far as in no way it has a jungle? Additionally, the Sun it what provides most of the torque on the Earth (by multiple orders of magnitude), so even moving the Earth to a distance where its year is 26,000 standard Earth years will not do the trick. – Samuel Dec 7 '15 at 19:49

The planet Uranus in our own Solar System has the rotational axis pointed more or less at the Sun, which provides decades of light at the pole, followed by decades of darkness as the planet orbits the Sun.

While a planet the distance of Uranus isn't likely to have any sort of vegetation, much less a jungle, an Earth like planet in the habitable zone might be able to support jungles. The hydrological cycle will need to be carefully mapped out to ensure that the proper amount of rainfall is available (perhaps each pole has an ocean or sea which is constantly illuminated during the "summer", something like the Arctic Ocean here on Earth), and of course the vegetation and wildlife will either have to hibernate during the winter during the dark period, or evolve to rapidly migrate across the planet as it orbits the Sun.

This means that the jungle will be at the "north" pole during the summer, migrate towards the equator during the spring and fall, and eventually establish itself on the "south" pole during the winter (as seen from the north pole).

Since plant life will have to grow and spread with incredible rapidity in order to follow the Sun, you can expect rather unusual conditions in the jungle, including explosive growth of creepers, vines and roots to establish the plant life and take advantage of the changing light conditions, explosive seed pods to "fling" seeds into the zones about to become illuminated and perhaps carnivorous plants that gather nutrients from animal and insect life, since the soils will probably be quickly depleted and lacking a lot of organic matter. Plants will also compete ferociously in order to get as much light as possible, so animal life evolved on this world will probably need to be either very small and fast, or large and armoured. Plants might have some limited sort of intelligence to take advantage of every aspect of the environment as it becomes illuminated, while the herbivores will also be much smarter, since "sneaking up on a plant" will become an actual survival skill. One can only wonder how much smarter the carnivores will be...