16
$\begingroup$

Let's pretend these magnificent and beautiful creatures are able to reproduce asexually so we can forget about their mating habits or their partners.

I have yet to witness any hard shell eggs laid underwater by any species and most mammals like to bear live offspring even underwater, just like whales and dolphins. Sea turtles prefer to bury their hard shell eggs in the sand on the beach partly because these eggs need certain temperature to develop.

Is it possible to have soft shell mermaids egg/spore in the sea/ocean?

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Horn sharks lay hard-shelled eggs. $\endgroup$ – Frostfyre Nov 30 '15 at 5:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since we're talking about a fantasy creature, it can do whatever you want. Logically, though, mermaids are (apparently) mammalian, and should have a mammalian reproductive system and habits. $\endgroup$ – Monty Wild♦ Dec 1 '15 at 2:32
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ @MontyWild You're right: They should behave like other mammals, like the Platypus and Echidna, and lay eggs. $\endgroup$ – user867 Dec 3 '15 at 3:07
  • $\begingroup$ @user867 - Amusing, but monotremes are an exceedingly edge case. Still, your point would not be entirely without merit, if you did not phrase it the way you did. $\endgroup$ – Xavon_Wrentaile Jul 4 '17 at 0:29
12
$\begingroup$

Unless the mermaids you're imagining are significantly more "alien" than the ones in typical mythology, then it doesn't make a lot of sense for them to lay eggs.

Mermaids are supposed to be half human aquatic beauties - that, to me, implies that they are mammals, and thus bear their offspring until giving birth to a living baby.

If, however, you'd like to make them utterly inhuman, then sure, they can lay eggs like fish. They may be limited in where they can lay them based on the pressure the eggs can withstand, the temperature of the water, etc. They may lay the eggs in caves along the shore which they can then guard, for example.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Unless there is a gas inside the egg it can be at any depth. Pressure doesn't matter so much when its omnidirectional and you're completely made of liquids. $\endgroup$ – Samuel Nov 30 '15 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ Just want to point out that there are mammals that lay eggs, albeit hard shelled eggs (platypuses and echidnas) $\endgroup$ – Pedro Gabriel Jul 2 '17 at 8:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PedroGabriel monotreme eggs are not hard shelled they are soft and leathery. Hard eggshells are unique to birds. $\endgroup$ – John Jul 2 '17 at 20:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I stand corrected $\endgroup$ – Pedro Gabriel Jul 2 '17 at 21:43
6
$\begingroup$

They lay eggs.

This is explained in Futurama by Umbriel the mermaid:

I'm not your first am I? I mean, I-I lay my eggs and leave and you release your fertiliser.

(Note that Umbrel is a moon of Uranus. Just like another famous mermaid, Ariel)

enter image description here

As we all know, mermaids have the human half on top and the fish part on the bottom (though some wish it was the other way around).

While they may be classified as mammals, not all mammals give birth to live young. The notable example is, of course, the other chimera of the animal kingdom, the mighty platypus. Eggs don't need a hard shell underwater for the same reason octopuses don't need skeletons, they're supported by the fluid around them and internal hydrostatic pressure. As they're made of essentially incompressible liquids, they can be at any depth (perhaps near volcanic vents for warmth).

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I thought of Futurama as well when answering this question, and I'm Australian how could I forget monotremes? Also, don't forget echidnas are also monotremes. $\endgroup$ – XenoDwarf Dec 1 '15 at 0:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @TunaDragon Yes everything is a bit off down there. I think Drop Bears lay eggs too. $\endgroup$ – Samuel Dec 1 '15 at 0:18
4
$\begingroup$

It depends on their tail, the more likely and realistic tail is a dolphin or dugong (manatee) tail instead of a fish tail, in which the mermaid would give birth to live young.

The less likely would be the fish (or even reptile) tail. As AndreiROM said, this would probably make the rest of the creature less mammalian and therefore less human, so not a half-human aquatic beauty. In this case they would lay eggs.

With only forelimbs and no hind limbs, I'd guess they'd stay underwater and lay soft-shelled eggs. Saying that, if they lay hard-shelled eggs on land it could explain what they're doing on the surface when they're spotted by sailors and fishermen.

Although it's not relevant to the question but instead the context for the question, I want to say just one last thing as a side note.

How would this species ever survive or even evolve into existence with only asexual reproduction? I suggest that the species comprises of one sex that has a unique sexual system that allows exchanging of genes (a simple one would be that they simply lay eggs and then fertilize each other's eggs. A few will become clones and a few will mix, or they could control the fertilization to remove chances of clones.).

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There are a few species that can exchange genetic material despite not having more than one sex. $\endgroup$ – user867 Dec 3 '15 at 3:08
2
$\begingroup$

If you google for "mermaid purse", you will find pages about egg cases. They look like this (taken from Wikipedia):

Mermaid purse

So when you see that lady casually swimming around the sea, doing her underwater shopping and chatting with her girl friends, and you notice her lady bag - it hasn't got a mirror and makeup in it. That's where she keeps her unborn children.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Nice reference. ...and... ...Ouch! $\endgroup$ – ShadoCat Sep 27 '18 at 18:24
1
$\begingroup$

In part, you have made an unwarranted assumption - that merfolk reproduce like "higher" animals, with either live birth or large eggs.

The life cycle of mers is completely up to you, and there is no reason to think of the young as recognizable, smaller versions of adults.

For all you know, mermaids produce hundreds or thousands of small eggs, like frogs or fish. The hatched young go through several life cycles, eventually becoming something like their final form. At some point they would join groups of adults to become socialized and educated.

Or not. Like I say, the subject is obscure.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Fish and Amphibians lay soft gel-style eggs, by the thousand.

Reptiles lay hard-shell or leathery eggs. Typically less than a hundred.

Mammals have live births, with fewer than 10 offspring. Marsupials do lay eggs, or have pouches.

You notice that more advanced species have fewer offspring. Mermaids are intelligent (typically), so they cannot lay thousands of eggs, there will not be enough resources for a proper brain in any of them. Better brain means fewer offspring, which means better protection for each offspring (hard shell or newborn's ability to react to its environmnet)

So mermaids will have to have a few offspring, and they will have to be either relatively tough eggs that they guard, or live birth. Eggs do not have to have a hard shell, it can be thick leathery hide.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Most of the previous answers make much harder assumptions than those actually found in nature.

I know of no reproductive process in the animal kingdom that doesn't have an egg or egg-analogue at some point.

Also, most of the cited situations (reptiles do this, mammals do that) have more exceptions than the answers imply.

While 'most' fish/amphibians/reptiles do lay eggs, many don't. While the platypus lays eggs, most mammals don't.

Some fish and reptiles (specifically some shark species and anacondas) hatch their eggs inside the mother, and then 'give birth' to live offspring. I don't see any significant difference (at least as far as this question is concerned) between that process and the process of a mammalian amniotic sack(egg-analogue) breaking, and then the mother 'giving birth'.

In the end, there is an 'egg', and it will 'hatch' and the offspring will come out of the mother whether still in the 'egg' or not. So the level of 'fish-like' qualities vs the 'mammal-like' qualities of the merfolk isn't really a factor. Instead, the answer is which fish and/or mammal is the mermaid the most similar too, in terms of reproductive biology. It could be mammalian, and still lay eggs, or fish/shark and still give live birth, or not.

Yes, it's entirely plausible for a species of merfolk to have relatively softshelled eggs, if that's how you want them for the story. And it can be adjusted anywhere along the entire range of mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish spectrum as needed.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$

protected by Community♦ Sep 27 '18 at 15:23

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.