(Related: Warfare without Metal)

In my setting, metals (including common metals such as tin and iron) are a rare commodity. Because of this, humans have to make weapons such as firearms (guns) with other resources.

In order to get to the level of technology that we are at today, humans have discovered how to create and manipulate buckminsterfullerene (aka buckyballs) in order to make electronics such as computers.

Guns are still made by propelling a bullet with an explosion (as they are today), so brittle materials like wood won't work.

You must assume:

  • Guns still use bullets, which means the bullets must also have a safe casing.
  • Humans are as advanced as they are today, so you may use any material that isn't rare.
  • The "no metal" rule applies to common metals like tin, iron, copper, etc, which means all of those count as rare.
  • Humans are the only species, and Earth is the only planet.

In short, what could guns and bullets be made out of if metal couldn't be used?

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ And a related question, how did they get as advanced as we are without fundamental materials which shaped the course of industrial society? The answer to that question will give very strong suggestions as to how they would go about accelerating a projectile rapidly, because they must have discovered something comparatively useful to fuel their advancement. Lacking steel, they must be substantially more advanced than us in some other realm. Perhaps bioengineering? I bet there's biomaterials that can take the pressure $\endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 16:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Related: Would glass bullets be feasible in a hypothetical world? $\endgroup$
    – user
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 16:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The low density of materials other than metal, and brittleness makes penetration of an alternate bullet a problem. $\endgroup$
    – Oldcat
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 17:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ see skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/7931/… $\endgroup$
    – njzk2
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 17:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See these 3 stories by Vernor Vinge. $\endgroup$
    – JDługosz
    Commented Dec 17, 2015 at 0:47

8 Answers 8


This is doable, but difficult. See this reference. This is a non-metallic fluorocarbon resin bullet. During testing, it apparently blasted a "four-inch diameter hole four inches deep" in a target designed to simulate a human. I think this is at least a proof of concept that non-metallic bullets are both possible and usable. One suspects that if ordinary bullets were not already perfect for their most common uses, research in this area would already have produced something more mainstream.

As for guns, plastic guns are already both feasible and tested. You can even build one at home, though I certainly would not recommend it.

In short, yes, with modern technology humanity could probably manufacture a non-metallic gun with non-metallic bullets.

  • $\begingroup$ This. Of course we're hand-waving away how to get to advanced, modern technology. But since they have computers with buckyballs, I guess that's a given. And, probably a given that they didn't have guns until recently. Although the plastic gun was relying on the metallic bullet case. $\endgroup$
    – user3082
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 20:36

In a metal-less world, you'd start to see the rise of crossbow type devices which deliver nearly the same damage without using explosives. If you insist on having guns with explosives but not metal, and it's a sufficiently advanced society, they might use some kind of composite plastic like carbon fiber. The 3d printing world has shown us that you can make firearms without metal, they just don't last that long. Given enough time, stronger composite materials would be created which could stand up to requirements needed for firearms.

  • $\begingroup$ Hello Zach, welcome on Worldbuilding! I would point out that most modern 3d printed guns use a few metal parts, and metal cartridges. Doing without metal would be an additional challenge. $\endgroup$
    – o.m.
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ I imagine they'd use a cartridge-less system or construct them using some type of composite as well. Maybe cartridges made of some sort of fullerene material since they are already in used in universe for computing. $\endgroup$
    – Zach
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 16:57
  • $\begingroup$ The metal cartridges help to contain the charge and to remove heat. Would other materials be useful? $\endgroup$
    – o.m.
    Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ Metal cartridges do not provide a meaningful benefit for heat removal. If anything, they make it easier for heat to flow from the combustion gasses to the chamber wall. They can be made from plastic, though that presents difficulties for extraction and re-using the cases. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 22, 2015 at 17:55

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/7931/can-a-gun-be-made-from-ceramic discusses this question. The answer seems to be "not at the moment, but people are working on it".

A world without metal but with modern-equivalent technology would have put a lot of work into ceramics and glass. All of the effort our current civilization has spent on metallurgy, in fact. They would probably start with a stone cannon and work on reducing its size.

A more fundamental question though: what is the planet made of? Note that both human and plant biology depends on trace metals, and most rocks have a lot of silicates in; if you can make a silicon carbide crystal of the right cylindrical shape you can use it for the base of the gun barrel and make the rest out of ceramic composite around it.


I simply don't think you would get guns as we currently think of them. Explosive propellant is too heavily linked to metallurgy.

What I think you would get instead is crossbow style and rocket launcher style. Fireworks are an old weapon of war - predating guns by quite a large margin. Tube launched fireworks seems a more logical direction.

And perhaps evolving rifling, guidance etc. perhaps earlier in the process, simply because of the nature of the projectile. Bullets need to be pretty simple, because of the concussion of firing. Missiles can be a lot more complicated (and may need to be, because initial velocity changes their usage significantly.)

  • $\begingroup$ Gyrojets! Plus one for that. $\endgroup$
    – Thucydides
    Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 3:19

You mention using buckyballs for computers. That same sort of technology might lend itself to guns made with other Carbon Allotropes.


Graphene could be used to provide high tensile strength, containing the explosive force with very little weight. This could be augmented with other, non-metal materials to provide rigid strength.

Bullets could use Diamond or Lonsdaleite to provide a strong, penetrating material. Casings would be open graphene balloons.


For single shot "zip gun" type weapons, almost any material can do. Indeed, with the restrictions given, it is difficult to imagine a firearm in the sense that we know today as being possible.

To make a modern "repeating" firearm, the challenge is multifold. The chamber needs to contain high pressures and high temperature gasses. The cartridge case is made of brass in modern weapons since it can expand slightly during firing to create a seal in the chamber, and its ejection helps remove a lot of heat from the chamber and weapon. It also helps that the metallic cartridge also mechanically protects the round and propellant in storage and in the magazine as well. Polymer cartridges have been experimented with (Notably the LSAT program), and caseless cartridges have also been developed (notably for the HK G-11 rifle program), but with limited success to date.

enter image description here

LSAT cased telescoped polymer ammunition as developed for a machine-gun

enter image description here

HK G-11 with 50 round magazine and caseless ammunition

The next challenge is to have a barrel which can handle the severe forces imparted by having a high speed projectile passing through it, along with heat buildup and mechanical strength to deal with soldiers bashing it in the field. Ceramic barrels might have some of the properties desired, but ceramic/metal composites seem to have the sorts of material properties to make an "ideal" barrel. Lacking metals, a ceramic barrel with a high strength material "wound" around it should have most of the properties desired, at the expense of a complex manufacturing process. The Carl Gustave M-3 has this on a larger scale in an 84mm recoilless rifle, but the rifled liner is still steel.

So the short version is firearms the way we understand them are going to be exceedingly difficult to make without metal. There are some possible substitutes, however.

Rocket projectiles have been around since ancient China. Using cardboard tubes filled with gunpowder attached to an arrow provides a simple yet effective projectile weapon, which can be fired from a crossbow like weapon individually or from a multiple rocket launcher to bombard an area with arrows

enter image description here

Take that!

A more modern variation was the Gyrojet rocket pistol and carbine, using a .45 cal projectile powered by a tiny solid filled rocket motor. Oddly enough it was quite safe at point blank range (you could stop the projectile by putting your thumb over the barrel), but became increasingly dangerous as the rocket built up velocity. Accuracy was ensured by having the rocket exhausts angles slightly to impart a rotation on the projectile as it was in flight.

enter image description here

Gyrojet ammunition

enter image description here

Gyrojet Mk 2 pistol

enter image description here

Gyrojet rocket carbines

The pressures inside the weapons are much lower than a conventional firearm, and they can be made of virtually any material (the historic ones used aluminum, but in principle even a plastic barrel would do). Polymer and ceramic could conceivably make a modern Gyrojet, should anyone be interested in reviving this, or for the purposes of your story set in the "modern" age.

Edit to add: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdW8Trh_MGg

This video shows a successful firing of a Mk2 pistol, and you can see the rocket spinning the round.


Bullets don't always come with casings. There are both modern caseless rounds and ancient muzzle-loaders (possibly with paper cartridges).

Jonah mentioned the modern 3d printed gun experiments. One might combine those with a muzzle-loading design and a non-metallic bullet.

That leaves the question of the initial spark. Caplocks and flintlocks use metal, so how about a matchlock?

There have been caplock revolvers, so a crude multi-shot design might be possible for a matchlock as well. Perhaps a pepper-box-style gun rather than a single-barreled revolver, or at least a double with fixed barrels.


The answer would depend heavily on how gun like you want your non-metal guns to be. The Hwacha (the MythBusters did an episode on It) looks like a good starting point for a non metal gun, reducing the size of the arrows, and developing an automatic reloading system. It might look something like the Gyrojet guns developed in the 1960s.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .