3
$\begingroup$

So it's the lead-up to what might be World War III and the enemy is kidnapping and implanting mind-control chips into our people, one by one, to turn them into sleeper agents, to all attack en masse when the signal is given. The victims who have been chipped remember the whole ordeal and try and reach out for help, but nobody will believe their crazy-sounding conspiracy babbling. After a while though, when enough people start turning up with the same plight, their claims start to be taken seriously and an investigation begins. The problem is, they can't quite find the chip in anyone!

The obvious/dumb solution, a metal detector, wouldn't work because, this setting being based on the real-world, there's no iron to be detected in the silicon chip wafers or from the precious metal traces on a PCB. And plus, transistors these days are TIIINY! The chip itself may be so small that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for any external scan to detect it, simply due to lack of resolution. The chip can receive commands though, therefore it can be assumed that it it can also reply too, broadcasting detectable (though potentially very weak, possibly intermittent, and on an unknown frequency) electromagnetic waves.

The victims make themselves available to undergo any kind of non-invasive test or process to help locate the chip in their bodies (so no exploratory brain surgery to find it). What kind of scans or other kind of test could have a chance at locating this within one's body, given the size, material composition, and other real-world constraints? CAT scan? MRI? X-ray? Something outside the box? And for the scans that wouldn't work (like the metal detector), bonus points for explaining why.

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Please select one of science-based or hard-science tags, these are meant to be mutually exclusive. $\endgroup$
    – Vesper
    Commented Jun 23, 2023 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ What @Vesper means is that you need to choose one of the above tags. Science-based means that you want roughly-scientific answers, which are 'close enough' to be passable as science. Hard-science means you want research papers, equations, university studies and peer-reviewed journal material in your answers, basically perfect scientific accuracy. Internal-constancy is for when you need a concept to make sense, even if there is no science used at all, like in magic, basically to ensure that you haven't made any logical contradictions. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 23, 2023 at 19:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The chip might be small, but its batteries or antennas surely aren't. They will show up quite nicely on X-ray. $\endgroup$
    – AlexP
    Commented Jun 23, 2023 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ MRI with a chip in your brain would be very, very bad. Induced current heating of the antenna runs the risk of baking the surrounding tissue. On the plus side, it would almost certainly fry the chip and its ability to control the victim. $\endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Commented Jun 23, 2023 at 21:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also, therefore it can be assumed that it it can also reply too seems like a strange assumption. Your car radio can receive no end of instructions and data, but is totally incapable of responding. And if someone is seeking to hide a chip, having it be radio-silent makes a ton of sense. $\endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Commented Jun 23, 2023 at 21:56

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

The tag is kinda overkill for this one. Please read it's wiki.

  1. X-Rays have been successfully used to scan a single atom. There is no chip that can be manufactured today that can't be detected by X-Ray... if you have the right X-ray. But, to be frank, a chip that could do anything more than binary math would be trivially detected by hospital-grade X-rays.

  2. An MRI is a metal detector. That's why you can't have any metal in your body or on your person when one is performed. A simple metal detector is using an inductive coil to detect fluctuations in a predictable magnetic field to identify the presence of metals. A Magnetic Resonance Imager is a metal detector on world-class steroids. It would rip ferrous metal out of your body. But it would also trivially detect the presence of non-ferrous metal and, to make a point, anything that doesn't have the expected density of the area being scanned.

  3. A computerized tomography scan, better known as a CT or CaT scan, is nothing more than a series of X-ray images and some high quality software. In other words, from a practical perspective, a CT scan is an X-ray.

  4. Just to make the list reasonably complete, a sonogram would have all the same consequences and results. It's just using sound waves rather than EM waves.

What all these scanning technologies do (and I'm simplifying), is test for density changes in the body. We know what the "average" or "expected" densities are so we can program software to point at an unexpected change in density and tell the operator, "huh, what's this?" The reason we have skilled analysts is that when all you have to work with is density it's beyond possible to have false positives.

And so what you might want to do is ask yourself, "what materials can I use to create my mind control chip that have densities similar to the area of the body where it's implanted?" What's cool about that question is that you could take advantage of contour changes in the brain where recorded densities are a bit flexible due to the inherent limitations in the technology, like the angles used to take the pictures (and that's one reason why MRIs use a rotating emitter).

In other words, I believe that with some creativity, a believable chip could be expressed in your world that would be difficult, but not impossible to detect, thereby allowing you to maintain an air of mystery to meet the needs of narrative necessity.

BTW: there are two reasons why a simple metal detector (like those used in airports) wouldn't detect the chip:

  1. There must be enough metal.

  2. Compared to an MRI they're weak. Really weak. A strong enough metal detector would easily detect a mere grain of iron. But it would also be difficult to constrain to the limits of the locale of the detector. In other words, a detector that strong would pull that dude at the end of the conveyor belt who's putting his favorite iron-infused necklace on right back to the detector — probably choking him to death.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Metal detectors detect any kind of metal, ferrous or non-ferrous. (They work by creating a rapidly oscillating magnetic field, which will induce oscillating eddy currents in any nearby piece of metal, which will create a magnetic field, which induces a curent in the detector loop.) Outside security theater in airports, one very popular use of metal detectors is to (try to) find long-lost gold and silver coins; people who take up this hobby or occupation are called "detectorists", and they can be found on fields and beaches. $\endgroup$
    – AlexP
    Commented Jun 24, 2023 at 3:30
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexP that's a good point. I've updated the answer to remove the misdirection. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – JBH
    Commented Jun 24, 2023 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ MRI is not a metal detector... It has issues with metals because it uses powerful magnetic fields to operate, but calling it a metal detector is like calling a gun a headache cure. And you cannot misdirect MRI by building your chip with same density as surounding tissue. MRI detect elements not density. And since it has very good resolution you couldn't even trick it by having an organic chip, as it would look like a tumor. $\endgroup$
    – Negdo
    Commented Jun 26, 2023 at 10:11
0
$\begingroup$

Here's what I would do:

I would place several individuals in completely EM shielded areas - nothing in, nothing out. There would be multiple sensors for multiple bands of the EM spectrum and then just wait for an EM signal.

Once the signal is detected, a copy is made Now we have something we know to look for, from there, we make a very sensitive bit of equipment to look for that thing, and then through multiple repetitions, find it.

And by that I mean this: We can make the assumptions that the chip would be located in approximately the same location for all victims. So, we have a group of volunteers who think they've been chipped, we start scanning them, once we get a hit in a specific region, we start scanning that region, once we get a hit in that region of the body, we start scanning an area, once we have a confirmation on an area - then we book the surgery.

So for example - we get a hit off the left arm - that gives us a region. Then we scan the left arm intensely, we get a hit just below the elbow - that gives us an area - then we go in and have a look.

Repeat the process as neccessary N number of times to get closer and closer. Also - once the first one is discovered and we can see what it is/interfaces with, we can then make educated guesses about where it would be on someone else.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Have you heard of the Great Seal of the USA embassy in Moscow? $\endgroup$
    – biziclop
    Commented Jun 24, 2023 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ @biziclop - never trust gifts from Russian children ;) $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 24, 2023 at 18:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .