23
$\begingroup$

This question is indeed inspired by I Am Mother movie and Horizon series, but scenario I envisioned is different.

Below is the in-world intro, feel free to skip it.


Hello, I'm Refa. Full name: Repopulation Facility #92308. Don't worry, my number does not mean there are 92307 other Refas. I don't know how many of us are there.

I am equipped with enough human embryos, frozen stocks of biomaterials and digitalized DNA sequences to provide viable human population at least three times. You are here to provide maintenance I undergo every ten years. For security reasons, I will induce short term amnesia that will kick in when you leave. I hope that trust that manages my funding compensated you well for your trouble. My location must remain secret for security reasons. Do you want me to back up your genetic material, so you can extend your line beyond potential death of humanity? [Yes / No]

Done. Yes, I can answer some of your questions. I predict that listening will slow you down by 5.29% and that's well within the safety parameters. I am fully functional AI. My IQ score is about 120 in human terms, but I am not directly comparable. My creative functions are severely limited compared to humans, and task I didn't anticipate and prepare for takes me much longer. On the other hand, for predictable tasks I am equivalent of a supercomputer. Yes, yes, you can say I am a supercomputer.

I am not designed to teach humans beyond basic communications skills. Data updates you bring contain an offline copy of Wikipedia and current guidelines for children education, but my creators predict I will fail after the children reach 10 years of age. No, mister Kowalski, I do not have any opinion on that. I was not designed to have opinions, only to find solutions. My main goal is survival of the human race. My creators believed that humans will be able to take care for themselves.

No, no extinction event is predicted. That's why there is a trust fund keeping me maintained. How will I know repopulation is needed? First, I'll wake up for my 10 year maintenance and no one will be waiting near the entrance. This will trigger my extinction verification procedure...


That's my problem. How an AI controlling secret underground base could know there are no viable populations of humans on the continent? I would prefer if Refa could know about the whole world, but one continent, for convenience of my western perspective let's say Europe or North America, would be enough.

In works that inspired me, it was known up front what will cause extinction, so their AIs had it easier. My idea is a failsafe AI built without any immediate need, just in case, like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, but for humans. But of course, there will no longer be humans when it is needed, hence the AI.

Satellites seemed a good choice but I concluded that in case of extinction caused by a total war any satellite capable of seeing humans from orbit would be a target. Also, I don't want transmissions to reveal Refa's location, and orbits low enough to see humans aren't stable for too long.

Radio emissions could, with good dose of reliability, confirm humans are still there, but cannot confirm we are extinct.

Technology level I aim for is near future. Everything we have now and everything that is planned or considered now, even in an early concept stage, goes.

How Refa actually works and how she preserves biological material and herself is off-topic here, it probably will be a subject of a new question but I'm not prepared to ask it yet; I'll ask it when I'll know enough to make a good question.

$\endgroup$
16
  • 27
    $\begingroup$ That's easy. When no more captchas are answered correctly, there's no humans left. $\endgroup$
    – Burki
    Apr 14 at 10:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Affirmative. I have poked one. It was dead. $\endgroup$
    – Daron
    Apr 14 at 12:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ To challenge the premise here for a second - what is the goal of the group creating the AI, and why is it required that humanity is extinct? If everyone, apart from say Ascension Island (pop. 800, 1600km off the coast of Africa) were killed is that not basically the same thing? How about if 99.9% of the population has been destroyed? If the intention is solely to ensure the survival of humanity, it might be better for the facility to activate at a 90% population drop (so you have a sufficient continuing population to pass on knowledge and experience) than at a 100% drop. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 at 17:45
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @NeilTarrant at 90% drop there's a risk it will continue to drop for the same reason. Adding more humans might not help it. And if population is no longer dropping and is still viable, then there's no need to repopulate really. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 14 at 18:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure it's even possible to prove civilization has died. As in, there's no way to prove that they aren't just around undetectably. They discovered multidimensional technology and are all enjoying infinitely more space, so you just can't see them because they don't happen to be in this precise dimensional slice. They developed mind-scanning and all become energy creatures. They all went to Mars for the Olympics. Underground or deep-ocean living is the trendy new thing. Etc ad infinitum. $\endgroup$ Apr 15 at 3:38

14 Answers 14

43
$\begingroup$

Refa's Supplies Run Low

Every time Refa has maintenance, her supplies are topped off.

Refa can only run for a few hundred years without supplies. Solar panels wear out, chemicals are used, hard drives need to be replaced, etc. Even with extensive recycling, Refa is not a closed system.

So when maintenance stops, Rega's clock starts.

Supply Levels

Refa has enough biological material to re-start humanity three times, so they do the first restart when supplies fall to 50%. If extinction hasn't actually happened yet, then the released humans will cause the existing civilization to find Refa and resupply it. This will reset the clock, and doomsday is avoided.

If not, the second release occurs at 20% supplies, and the final restart happens at the last possible moment, when failure is imminent.

It Doesn't Matter if Refa's Wrong

When Refa is out of supplies, the project is over. It doesn't matter if humanity wasn't quite extinct prior to the final release - that release was the last reboot possible. Refa couldn't have waited.

Either the reboots work, and the next human civilization gets to build their own failsafe, or... it didn't, and cockroaches inherit the earth.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You made a very good point I overlooked. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 14 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ Accepted. I will add other options as supplementary, because starting earlier might be a good idea, but the clock will be the main mechanism. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 16 at 8:57
32
$\begingroup$
  • check your inbox : no updates since a few years ...
  • Check the internet : no connection ...
  • Check visually around the lair, with that camera at top of the mountain. The big city 50 km away is now in ruins ...
  • (edit) Check the atmosphere composition : still the same ? viable for human ? if there's a lot of radation, you probably know what it means.
  • (edit) Send ground drone not far to check the soil. Still the same ? Or is there a big layer of ash who could mean volcanic activities or a big meteorite hit the earth ... though you can't know if it's local (but you would know if there's a volcano around) or worldwide.
  • check the waves : radio, TV, radar, 3/4/5/6/7G, talkie walkie, anything. Total silence is really a bad sign
  • try to communicate with know satellite (connection infos are part of the update you should have received). There are a lot, so i doubt all would be destroyed. Then you can use them with the others points.
  • Use your telescope / radar to check if others satellites are still there. All destroyed ? also not a good sign
  • use radar to check for plane or anything flying (or not if you don't want to reveal your position ... communicating with satellite if safer as the broadcast is directed)
  • Final stage : send drones. Plane size, with good glide capabilty, electric powered with solar panel are probably your best bet. They can fly a long time, recharge while flying, at worst land on grass, recharge and go on. They would check visually for human sign (fire, building, crop ...) and scan the waves, mostly on close range frequency your base can't intercept.

In the end you can't prove a negative, so it's a matter of degree of confidence. Scan for weeks, months or years, there come a moment you're "fairly certain" humanity is no more.

Also, you don't want to reveal your location, but actually broadcasting it would be the most efficient way ...

$\endgroup$
9
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Don't forget to check livability conditions. Radiation level: very deadly, temperature: +/-100C, everything is underwater, the term urban jungle now means something different, etc. If conditions like these apply, then it is likely humanity has perished. $\endgroup$
    – vinzzz001
    Apr 14 at 11:50
  • $\begingroup$ @vinzzz001 A caveat, if the goal is to repopulate humanity, then those livability conditions will need to be established before you start, otherwise you end up with your facility full of messy humans and your long-term viability for future attempts will degrade fast. $\endgroup$
    – Ruadhan
    Apr 14 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Ruadhan It is true you shouldn't start dispatching humans in those conditions, if the conditions do happen, you can dispatch humans after those conditions clear up enough and still be reasonably certain that humans haven't evolved all on their own again. $\endgroup$
    – vinzzz001
    Apr 14 at 12:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The internet idea is smart. Just say something super controversial on Reddit, and if no one responds... $\endgroup$
    – Murphy L.
    Apr 14 at 13:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Also, you don't want to reveal your location, but actually broadcasting it would be the most efficient way..." Well, broadcasting a location. If you want to remain hidden, broadcast a location that you can monitor remotely that isn't your actual location. Same benefit, none of the risk. $\endgroup$
    – Martin
    Apr 15 at 15:21
31
$\begingroup$

It's easy: send out the killbots. Have them report back every year or so with a murder-tally.

If they consistently report 0 (or close enough) then humans are extinct.

The humans might try to fight back against the killbots and claim that you "have gone rogue" but that's dumb,because they are the ones who tasked you with repopulating the earth, and as long as they are alive you can't do that.

Very annoying.

$\endgroup$
10
  • 17
    $\begingroup$ Gotta optimise those paperclips somehow right? $\endgroup$
    – Ruadhan
    Apr 14 at 11:40
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't know who downvoted this, but listen: this is the plot in Horizon: New Dawn. This is how the AI's were programmed to be sure there was no living human so they could start repopulating from frozen embryos. But killbots were only being used because the AI responsible for poisoning the atmosphere was not fully functional. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 at 11:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TheSquare-CubeLaw Ish. Hades was the "Wipe the slate clean so there can be another attempt" option. Basically if the ecosystem they were rebuilding got too messed up, they could kill it and start fresh. Humans weren't meant to be generated and released until that part was settled and there was a nice safe planet to repopulate. Hades was never explicitly meant to kill humans, but they weren't excluded from its orders either. Hades didn't have the tools it was meant to use, so it repurposed the killbots that killed the planet in the first place and got to work. $\endgroup$
    – Ruadhan
    Apr 14 at 13:00
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @TheSquare-CubeLaw Not even that much. Hades was meant to be activated by GAIA in the event that terraforming was failing. In that case, Hades would then scour the world's biosphere back down to the bedrock and deactivate again. That's it. Hades' objectives don't factor humans in at all. Its only job is to destroy the biosphere. That inherently kills everyone on earth, but shouldn't be necessary if Gaia got to the point where humans were bred. However Hades isn't programmed to care whether its job is necessary. Hades only knows that it has been activated and there's work to do. $\endgroup$
    – Ruadhan
    Apr 14 at 15:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JasonC mine and Ruadhan's comments are references to the Paperclip Maximizer, a theoretical AI that got orders to Make Paperclips, and then goes rogue trying to convert alle matter in the universe into paperclips en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$
    – Borgh
    Apr 15 at 15:44
13
$\begingroup$

Fires are a good indication of human presence. We are the only species controlling fire, therefore where there is an artificial fire there are humans.

An AI should be able to tell natural fires from artificial ones, and therefore monitor human presence. In particular after a cataclysm, if there are humans they will be using open fires.

They can be monitored with diffused IR and weather sensors, covering the emerged lands, possibly disguised as bugs/insects.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Good idea, but to use it I'll need to find out a way to monitor a whole continent for fires. So you solved what to look for, but not how to look for. It is a lot (+1), but not quite enough for me to use yet :) $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 14 at 8:51
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Mołot infrared satellites in stable orbits maybe? $\endgroup$
    – KeizerHarm
    Apr 14 at 8:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KeizerHarm Orbital Decay of Low Earth Orbit satellites will make that difficult, and I can't find anything about taking photos, IR or otherwise, from higher orbits. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 14 at 9:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let's presume that part of the decade update is an update on the listening codes for "atmospheric analysis" satellites. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 at 19:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mołot here's a real-time feed of the Earth from geostationary orbit. Of course you couldn't detect fires from this image, but with a purpose-built satellite it would be no problem - the challenge is nothing compared to what space telescopes can do. $\endgroup$
    – N. Virgo
    Apr 16 at 1:42
8
$\begingroup$

High orbit satellites.

While low orbit satellites are vulnerable to missiles, high orbit satellites aren't. They can be around 60000km away, which is a huge distance for a missile or ICBM to travel. It's also not gonna deorbit anytime soon, and there's not much debris.

You can scan for fires, large scale building projects, and do a spectroscopic scan of the atmosphere for any life. The AI's advanced algorithms can detect if it's a natural or artificial construction.

Even if a few humans still exist somewhere, if they've fallen so low they've forgotten how to make fires then you need a civilization revival.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

A limited stock of drone aircraft

TL:DR - Due to isolation and rough-terrain, the best option is to deploy remote-operated drone aircraft to look for signs of human habitation.

The Svalbard Seed-vault was placed where it was because the cold temperatures and isolated location mean that even without operational refrigeration equipment, the seeds stored there will remain safe for a long time.
It was not placed there with growing-conditions in mind for those seeds.
That's the job of anyone who wants to retrieve them.

A Repopulation Facility however has different needs.

Such a facility needs to be located somewhere reasonably temperate, with enough natural resources that the humans created there have what they need to survive, that means fresh water, food, materials to build shelters.

In short, somewhere habitable.

This means the facility is most likely going to be located near existing human settlements, just not cities which might be targeted in a war.

The AI therefore has a ready-made indicator of human habitation in the form of known settlements to look for, ones which due to their remoteness may survive a lot of potential disaster scenarios that could have otherwise provided false-positives.

If the AI fails to find human habitation in known locations, it would widen its search to the limits of its fuel-capacity. Grid-searching for thousands of miles using solar-powered drones, checking known locations of communities (even if a city is destroyed, humans tend to rebuild on the same sites).

Once it becomes clear that there are no human settlements anywhere within range, the AI can safely conclude that The Time Has Come to repopulate the human race.

This strategy also goes hand-in-hand with the AI's other priorities.
It is necessary to scout the region and establish how viable the environment and terrain are for human habitation.
The AI needs to know that kicking its first-generation humans out the airlock won't dump them into a radioactive storm and kill them 10 feet from the gate.

The AI's drone aircraft are going to have to be a compromise of design. Most likely some kind of VTOL drone resembling a quad-copter.
Though in general, a larger airplane style drone would be better equipped to travel further, this would require a runway, or at least a catapult-launch system, which requires a great deal of maintenance and supporting infrastructure that may not be available post-apocalypse.

Storing small drones inside the facility means they can be moved into the airlock via service robots and launched from the ground.

I would anticipate that the AI would have access to a mix of both short-range quad-copter drones, and one or more larger airplane-style drones it can vertically launch from a protected silo.

In the event that the AI detects existing human settlements and opts to go back to sleep, it would need to be able to recover its larger drones. Most likely such drones would be capable of limited VTOL so that they can be reloaded back into their launch silos, maintained and prepared for the next time without human assistance.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If the AI's goal is to remain undetected, any drones will need to be assumed to be single-use. It's reasonable to expect that you can launch a drone without anyone noticing, but there's a high risk that any returning drone will be followed. For this reason, my "are humans still there?" drones would be autonomous winged drones: the drone will only come back and transmit its findings if there aren't any humans. If the drone doesn't come back, then either there are still humans around, or conditions are not conducive for human life. In either case, wait another ten years for the next check. $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    Apr 15 at 0:07
4
$\begingroup$

Satellite launch facilities in missile launch tubes:

Your facility is built in a decommissioned NORAD bunker. As such, it is in a nice, safe facility well documented as no longer being a military facility. But the place is hard-wired to a significant number of decommissioned nuclear launch facilities.

Passive sensors and monitoring the local environment will tell you if something bad has happened, but not if humanity is extinct. So you have old ICBM facilities with satellite launch vehicles to be deployed only if the local indicators show an extinction-level event.

This gets around the issue of the satellites having been destroyed. You only launch AFTER the event, when people are hopefully not shooting down satellites anymore. Since your rockets are in hardened missile silos, only direct hits by big weapons will destroy them (and probably make your mission moot by vaporizing the base). And satellites will give you the big picture view you need to determine if mankind has been wiped out.

If something or someone destroys your satellites, then either a.) humans aren't extinct, or b.) something is around that will likely interfere with your repopulation plans. So keep some additional satellite launch tubes free to try again in a while and see if you can get through.

  • The US government spent $6 billion dollars building the Stanley R. Mickelsen Safeguard Complex missile defense base with giant hard-wired radars capable of spotting incoming missiles and a network of missile interceptor launch tubes to stop incoming Russian missiles. The whole thing had a huge underground network and was abandoned after being fully operational for a little less than 24 hours. But what if the whole thing was a ruse to build your repopulation facility? Or your group bought the whole thing for peanuts?

Stanley

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Time

Humans are resilient creatures. If they survive, they will eventually rebuild their civilization, especially given all the crap and knowledge that's lying around from the previous one, they won't have to start from the cavemen level.

But it's been a century since the last radio transmission ceased, and it was an automated numerical station. Two centuries passed. Three... The radio is still dead and only static fills all available frequencies. Nobody communicates. Nobody came to reclaim the land. The few satellites that were left in geosynchronous orbit that weren't destroyed show no radio emissions either. If humans didn't reinvent the radio for so long, then it means there's nobody to reinvent it.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What if humans figured out that when you use the radio mr killer bots show up. So they started communicating the old fashioned way, word to mouth or letters? Sadly that how currently some bad actors in the world do their business in this electronic day and age $\endgroup$
    – Sam B
    Apr 15 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ The OP doesn't mention that the AI is genocidal. $\endgroup$ Apr 16 at 18:22
3
$\begingroup$

Bait the humans

Once obvious signs of human activity have gone, and have failed to return despite a reasonable wait, summon them.

Put out some delicious supplies, and announce the fact via radio broadcast and fireworks display. If there are humans, they will come to collect the bait. If anyone comes to collect, reset your clock.

Repeat until nobody shows up.

Very importantly: let them take the supplies. You do not want future humans to have any doubt that answering the signal will be worth their while. Create no excuse for humans to tell campfire stories about trickster signals.

To cover lots of territory, use drone dropships to deposit the supplies in different places. Couple this with any intelligence that's available to place each deposit where you think it is most likely to be discovered.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Wastewater DNA sampling

At the end of the day, detecting tech only works as far as the humans still have the materials, skills and (importantly) need for the relevant tech. Plenty of people living off-grid today produce no clear radio/satellite/internet footprint.

If you want to find humans, look for human DNA - we shed ~30g of gut cells in our stool every day. A lot of it will end up in wastewater, so place sensors at geographical locations where natural concentration would occur, like river mouths, and set yourself up with some very, very sensitive chromatography columns that bind a variety of human-specific loci.

This will fail if your humans are so disastrously mutated by the radioactive apocalypse that their DNA no longer matches your sensors. But then, are they human anymore?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ This would place Refa in a river delta, historically a good place for a preindustrial people to live. That's a nice bonus. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 15 at 10:50
  • $\begingroup$ I like and considered this idea, but to analyze if humanity is extinct, you'd need extensive sampling infrastructure positioned globally with significant lab functions. $\endgroup$
    – DWKraus
    Apr 15 at 13:09
  • $\begingroup$ @DWKraus I agree for a global scale but it may be feasible at continental scale - I had assumed a network of sampling stations all reporting back to a central Refa. And the tech is not that complex - we're talking affinity purification, not DNA sequencing. $\endgroup$
    – Ottie
    Apr 15 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ in modern settlements it ends up in waste water, because they have waste water. a simple cess pit ( aka hole dug in the ground) negates this. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Apr 15 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @John it gets into the water table one way or another, even without active plumbing (source: we had a spring near our house that got contaminated by some neighbours' livestock waste). The AI can monitor the concentrations and plot trends over time to detect declines. $\endgroup$
    – Ottie
    Apr 15 at 20:46
2
$\begingroup$

Supposing that you are merely looking for functional extinction instead of absolute extinction, this should be possible with adequate resources. For the purposes of discussion, functional extinction is a population low enough to not be immediately noticeable to any visiting aliens, and also non-viable in a way that humanity will be absolutely extinct within two human lifetimes if not before.

Your AI will need a small fleet of high-altitude surveillance drones. A dozen might suffice, two dozen plus spares would be better. They are aircraft, though I hesitate to give specifics on their exact flight technology... it is perhaps possible that a weather balloon type device might be ideal, or these might be a sort of glider with integrated solar. They will need to stay aloft for weeks or months, and I do not believe your AI can reuse these long term. So, this is the final step of an evaluation, after using more trivial but less reliable means. Things like doing an RF survey, attempting to make contact via radio, plugging into any surviving internet infrastructure, and so on. All those checked out, so now we're looking for any signs of intelligent (or, since we're talking human, let's be honest, what passes for intelligent) life.

These drones are launched over a period of several days when the weather seems to be good. They become their own communications network if satellites are down. They loiter over continents looking for the various signs of intelligent life and of (primitive) industrial society. Fire, carbon dioxide output that suggests burning fuels, maybe electrical power. Automobile traffic. The survival of artificial structures that tend to see rapid decline without maintenance... maybe not nuclear plants, those could be shut down in a way that they no longer pose a threat of catastrophic failure, but some bridges and dams would be gone in just decades without constant maintenance, as would many large buildings. Synthetic aperture radar and a nice big dose of AI machine vision should be sufficient to make such determinations, and a host of other sensor suites are available with today's technology that could do such an assessment.

The real question is how to handle non-extinction. If a collapse occurs, in some scenarios you might have a population of 100,000 hanging on in a technologically primitive fashion but without further threat of dwindling away into nothing. They might be isolated to a single continent. What exactly is the mission in such a situation? It makes no sense to keep checking back every 10 years (though it would be far simpler to check, now that the AI knows where to look) when each subsequent survey damages more equipment.

I'll assume that's not a possibility though in the story you're writing.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the story I'm envisioning there is no extinction event at all. What I need is a problem with detection mechanism. And for that I need believable detection mechanism. At the very least I need to believe it. But Refa is not a knowledge failsafe, it is a human species failsafe. Maybe there are knowledge repositories. Maybe there are not. Refa doesn't know and was programmed not to care. (In my head there are but won't be featured). So primitive population count as population if it's big enough. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 14 at 20:42
2
$\begingroup$

Refa has an advantage I don't think anyone else is considering: she knows humans aren't extinct yet, so she has time to prepare a way to track them! Consider a virus, created to infect only humans. Like the shingles virus, it remains dormant in the host for many years. Crucially, it should not cause any adverse effects. But what it does do is cause human cells to emit a unique, highly traceable organic compound. For example, small amounts of Chlorofluorocarbons have a large effect on the amount of ozone in the atmosphere. The amount of ozone can be measured by ground based laser sensing stations. So if humans still exist, even at a pre-industrial level, they would produce a noticable impact. Refa could even keep the test virus in reserve, to be released only if other tests (like the technician coming to the facility) fail.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Easier--it produces something quite stable that is excreted in the urine. You monitor river water for the chemical. $\endgroup$ Apr 17 at 2:13
0
$\begingroup$

I read that NASA checks for methane gas in Mars atmosphere to gauge whether there are living organism. Per NASA methane is first sign of life.

https://earthsky.org/space/methane-1st-sign-of-alien-life-exoplanet/

So AI needs to check methane levels were before and after wiping us off this planet. If the intensions were to only kill humans and leave other beings/animals alone then that wouldn't be a good guage. We also have natural stores of methane on earth. Anyways, this is another easy test it can do. I dont like killer AIs :)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I'm looking for humans only. I don't expect total biosphere destruction. Methane will be there, humans or no humans. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Apr 17 at 6:46
-1
$\begingroup$

Internet Then Heat Signatures

First thing should be checking internet, considering most part of it would work without maintenance for a quite some time humans are definitely going to try to use it as a means of communication. If internet is still viably online yet unused, this is a major sign of human absence.

But wait, humans may abandoned the internet or maybe whole infrastructure decayed as time passed by both also applicable to radio as well. If there is still usable satellites who can check ground for temperature changes this would give away all unnatural heat sources to investigate as a possible human encampment, if satellites are caput lucky for Refa since she still can deploy government drones because it is also build by government an chances are that it is connected to important networks can let her access to required drones.

Humans would create unmissable amount of heat because we need to cook, heat and defend ourselves and find fire comforting. Even our bodies would create heat can be detected alone. So detecting massive unnatural heat sources, can and will give Refa a good starting point.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ As it’s currently written, your answer is unclear. Please edit to add additional details that will help others understand how this addresses the question asked. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center. $\endgroup$
    – Community Bot
    Apr 15 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ heat and heat observable by satellite are two different things. humans can get by without heat visible to a satellite. All they need to do is cook in a cave, or under a tree canopy. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Apr 15 at 19:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .