# How big does a world have to be to not have a sunset?

Normally we watch the sun descend, it's dimmed a bit by the atmosphere before dropping below the horizon.

What I'm interested in is how big it would have to be so the atmospheric dimming is sufficient that the point it dips below the horizon is unnoticeable.

External Edit: This is how I understand the question: On Earth the sunset has two phases. In the first phase the sun moves towards the horizon, and its light is dimmed by the shallower angle it makes with the planet and the longer journey through the horizon. The light continues dimming as the angle becomes shallower. The second phase begins when the sun touches the horizon. Usually the atmospheric dimming is mild enough that the outline of the sun can be seen touching the horizon. In phase 2 the sun moves under the horizon the dimming is more pronounced than phase 1 and continues until the sun is no longer visible.

The Asker wants a world where the dimming in phase 1 is so extreme that by the beginning of phase 2, the outline of the sun can no longer be made out in the sky. Maybe it is visible as an indistinct glow or maybe there is no light getting through the atmosphere at all!

(Assume an unaided human observer in an atmosphere suitable for a terrestrial ecosystem, it need not be exactly Earth's atmosphere. When the star is overhead something like 1000W/m^2 like we get on Earth.)

I have no doubt this has to be far bigger than any rocky planet and thus must be some sort of megastructure. (Say, a Dyson Sphere with stars orbiting it.)

• This happens all the time on Earth! Probably not too often in Las Vegas though. Have you ever visited Seattle? Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 2:21
• Can you be more specific? I think sunset is defined differently than you're using it. Do you mean a planet with no twilight? (Which would happen with a thin atmosphere.)
– JBH
Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 3:09
• Do you mean - the sun is not directly visible when it's apparent position is near the horizon such that there's just a general glow, which continues after the sun's relative position is below the horizon, gradually fading, so that there's no distinct transition between day/night? Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 3:58
• This is worded extremely vague and many interpretations can be assumed. There is no sunset, as exactly worded, on a world of any size that is tidally locked. That is the title answer, but the description asks something completely different. Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 4:45
• @Willk Sounds like the question isn't "can you find specific examples where the sunset is blocked" but "Nowhere on this planet gets a sunset, how big does it have to be for that to be the case?" Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 12:05

We want a sufficiently long light path through the air when looking horizontally that atmospheric extinction will increase (recall that larger magnitudes are dimmer, smaller magnitudes are brighter) the magnitude of the sun to the point that it is not discernible to the human eye by the time it reaches the horizon.

Minimum attenuation in Earth's atmosphere is about 0.16 magnitudes per airmass, where 1 airmass is the path from the surface straight up towards the zenith. It would be nice if we could just use some trigonometry to figure out how much longer that path is along the horizontal... but that doesn't actually work, because air density remains high for longer the lower your elevation angle.

Empirically, however, looking towards the horizon gives you about 40 airmasses on Earth, which would give you an extinction factor of about 6.4 magnitudes. In practice, Earth's air is never that clear for that long, so empirical extinction for our sun is considerably higher-about 11 magnitudes for 40 airmasses.

The sun's zenith magnitude is -26.7, and the limit of human perception is 6.5. So, we need a total extinction factor of 33.2--or just a little over 3 times what we have on Earth. Since a path near the horizon spends the vast majority of its time in the thick, lower atmosphere, I think we can reasonably discount the drop in air density with altitude and treat it as uniform when figuring out how much to extend the path--which means simply tripling the path length (plus a bit) should be a reasonable approximation.

However, exactly how that path length scales depends on exactly how deep you choose to approximate the atmosphere as being. 90% of the mass of the atmosphere is below 16km, so if we use 20km as an approximation of the optical-equivalent atmospheric depth, fiddling around with WolframAlpha using the following equations for atmospheric path length

$$l = (d+r)\sin\theta$$

$$l = (d+r)\sqrt{1-\cos^2\theta}$$

$$l = (d+r)\sqrt{1-(\frac{r}{d+r})^2}$$

where $$d$$ is the effective atmospheric depth and $$r$$ is the planet's radius, I get 57371 km as the radius beyond which atmospheric attenuation would make the sun invisible just before it hits the horizon. Or, just under 9 times the radius of Earth, assuming all else (gravity, surface pressure, and atmospheric composition) is held equal.

• Duh! I got bogged down in trying to deal with the varying atmospheric density--you're right, it's not even needed! And I'm amazed at how small the answer is. Commented Mar 8, 2022 at 3:10
• No sunsets on a supermundane world. Commented Mar 8, 2022 at 3:41
• You may want to use the scattering+attenuation at 720nm since red is less attenuated. But doesn't red end at 700nm? Well the cutoff isn't watertight and a very bright 720nm source is visible. So when does the disk not become 10x dimmer or so than all the scattered light? Commented Jul 17, 2022 at 7:58
• @LorenPechtel I hope you're not trying to make something live on that world... assuming Earth density, that's enough gravity to kill a person. Commented Jul 18, 2022 at 13:56
• @EthanManess So make it a much-less-dense artificial structure... or just populate it with Mesklinites! Commented Jul 18, 2022 at 17:55

You said,

Normally we watch the sun descend, it's dimmed a bit by the atmosphere before dropping below the horizon.

On earth, we watch this

• in a plain desert, with no fog or clouds and the sun descends far away in the sand.
• on a beach, with no fog or clouds and the sun descends far away in the water.

The bright to dark duration is small and transition seems rather abrupt.

Then you write the second scenario as:

its dip below the horizon is unnoticeable.

On earth we watch this

• in cities with tall buildings around.
• in mountains with a lot of trees around.
• when horizon is foggy.
• when horizon is cloudy.

You can choose any of above situations.

After the External edit, the new answer is as follows

Atmospheric extinction is the dimming of starlight by the terrestrial atmosphere. The path length through the atmosphere is known as the air mass. Air mass increases with zenith angle as shown in the figure below (taken from here).

There are three main sources of the extinction in the atmosphere.

• The Rayleigh scattering of light
• The ozone extinction
• The aerosol extinction

The atmospheric extinction will increase if

• amount of atmosphere is increased.
• thickness of ozone layer is increased.
• scattering is increased.

With sufficiently large coefficient of extinction, as the sun goes down, air mass will increase (see figure) and sun will gradually become invisible.

• I believe the question is trying to say that nowhere on the planet gets a sun set, no matter how clear the sky or your line of sight is. Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 12:03
• @Lio Elbammalf I have edited the answer. Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 14:06
• Basically my thought processes--but I got stuck trying to from this to numbers. Commented Mar 8, 2022 at 3:03

What I'm interested in is how big it would have to be so the atmospheric dimming is sufficient that the point it dips below the horizon is unnoticeable.

I'm afraid that size does not even enter the picture, and would not work anyway.

What you want is a dimming difference between two angles the Sun makes with the horizon. When the apparent height of the sun varies little, we are also in a zone where the light path through the atmosphere varies almost linearly with the angle. So, you can't have an abrupt dimming.

Also, if the dimming with respect to the zenith is complete when, say, the Sun's angle is 30° or less, this would restrict the day to a few hours (i.e., the Sun appears when it's at zenith minus 30°, disappears at zenith plus 30°; of a 360° day, only 60° - one sixth - are daylight. You get four hours of day and twenty of night.).

Also, anything below the critical angle would be extinguished by atmospheric extinction, and so would appear... like a horizon. What you'd accomplish would be something similar to raising the horizon.

On the other hand, a large megastructure might have several artificial Suns orbiting, or suspended, at a fixed height, and more directional to boot. That would get you closer to your goal, and also, the possibility of having several Suns going around the structure would compensate the "4h day and 20h night" effect. Slow down the Sun by a factor of 3, and get 12h day and 60h night. Add two more Suns equally spaced, and you get 12h day and 12h night.

• Size definitely enters into the picture. If you want to maximize daylight, then you want the image of the sun to complete fade out just before it hits 90 degrees from the zenith. That implies a certain minimum depth of atmosphere, and thus (assuming Earthlike air composition and gravity), a specific minimum radius of curvature to provide that depth. Commented Mar 7, 2022 at 23:37
• I was figuring on multiple stars, but that's extraneous details on the basic problem. Commented Mar 8, 2022 at 3:05