Battlefield -- Weapon of Fear
The power to drain the life from a moderately-wounded soldier is not super strong considering the time period. Correct me if I'm wrong, but infection was still THE killer in warfare in the 1780s. There is not a huge difference between (what today would be called) a moderate wound killing by infection or by life-draining monster.
Unless. . . .
To make the creatures more important I suggest they (a) can turn invisible (or at least hide underground using incorporeal-ness) and (b) kill in a highly painful and bloody manner that is traumatic for any allies watching. For example by siphoning all the blood from the body while the victim screams in agony.
This makes them great at breaking enemy formations, by rising out of the ground behind the main line and causing a bloody spectacle by targeting troops whose wounds are not enough to disable them. The carnage causes the front few lines to flee, and the rest of the army follows.
Assassinations and Guerilla warfare.
The monsters are useful when combined with the cheap and portable weapon of a blowtube filled with ground glass. A ranged weapon much cheaper than a firearm, that shoots a cloud of ground glass at your targets face at a few metres range. On its own not a lethal weapon, it will at worst blind the target and cause profuse but superficial bleeding, similar to a skinned knee. However combined with a monster lurking underground this will kill in a number of minutes.
The fact that any civilian on the street could be secretly armed like this will have a huge effect on security procedures, and means a lot more troops are needed to secure an area with rebels. It will be similar to modern precautions, for if you suspect citizen on the street carrying a concealed bomb.
Or maybe the soldiers just start wearing face coverings. A good justification for the evil empire's troops wearing identical black helmets.