0
$\begingroup$

Since my Great Lakes Earth scenario isn't going well, I'd might as well go back to something simpler.

Non-human hominids are prevalent in European mythology--elves, dwarves, giants, etc.

So the scenario is, if any of them are in Pleistocene environments and categorized as "archaic humans", what kind of habitats would each race be suited for?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Aify, Mikey, JDługosz, Burki, Magic-Mouse Aug 13 '15 at 12:40

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ What does "not going well" mean? What kind of story are you trying to tell, beyond a certain rearrangement of geography? $\endgroup$ – o.m. Aug 2 '15 at 10:37
  • $\begingroup$ It was for an alternate history textbook, which was supposed to serve as a blueprint for future stories. $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Aug 2 '15 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ The way I see it, an alternate history departs from ours at a clear point of departure. It might not be immediately obvious to the reader, but the writer should know. The story could be set at the departure or much later, dealing with the results. For want of a nail, a horseshoe was lost. For want of a horse, a message was late. Or the other way around, the message did get through. Napoleon won at Waterloo. Steam engines got invented in the 13th century. The Romans didn't defeat Carthage. Now what? Moving continents is not suitable for a textbook alternate history. $\endgroup$ – o.m. Aug 2 '15 at 16:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ possible duplicate of How would multi-race humanoid evolution happen $\endgroup$ – ckersch Aug 3 '15 at 20:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnWDailey, I have some comments in meta.worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/2257/… $\endgroup$ – o.m. Aug 4 '15 at 5:03
1
$\begingroup$

In fact there is no reason to think they never existed and are not just Homo sapiens.

Scientific explanations of dwarves, giants and elves

In fact there are (pseudo science) theories which assume dwarves were just different hominid species (like Homo floresiensis) living till several hundred years ago. But more reliable theories describe such legends (and archeological findings) just as individual differences between specimens of homo sapiens which in the past could be bigger between various nations as humans were more isolated by geography (no planes, no trains, mountains are nearly untraversable) resulting in different groups describing the others as dwarves/giants respectively. Imagination and psychedelics could develop the idea further (as just individual differences could not justify legends about pixie, krasnoludek etc.).

On the other hand elves are thought to be folklore description of Williams syndrome (like werewolf is a folklore understanding of humans suffering rabies). It is not the only source of the idea (imagination could play a big role too) but if we want to find scientific explanation it is most feasible.

Hominids

If you move back in time (like you assumed) to have other species of hominids still living around you do not need to introduce new ones as there were ones resembling what you are looking for (especially already mentioned hobbit-like Homo floresiensis).

As for me features assigned to dwarves, elves or giants are not enough distinctive to justify living in different habitats than Homo sapiens. Unless you count either habitats assigned to them by mythology or fantasy (mainly Tolkien as most of his successors inherit their races unchanged).

Mythology

Germanic dwarves are believed to live in mountains (either in forests or in mines), but similar beings from other cultures could life in other places, like slavonic Krasnoludek which belongs to human houses (and are a kind of helpful spirits) or forests.

Elves are traditionally assigned to forests and believed to be great poets (which further justifies theory that they were just Williams syndrome sufferers rejected by their society) what Tolkien and other fantasy authors continues.

Giants appear in various mythologies and are could be just some feature assigned to powerful warriors (especially unfamiliar enemies), which gives no particular clues about their origin (unless we research factual data about humans of different ancient nations).

Summary

If you are writing a novel I would rather stick to existing stereotypical habitats of fantasy beings (if you want something new take races from mythology and not Tolkien, especially non-germanic, and non-nordic ones, as they are already overexploited).

If you want some scientific evidence just read about real hominids.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I had, but I think you completely didn't answer the question. $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Aug 1 '15 at 19:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.