Barnacles are a type of arthropod constituting the subclass Cirripedia in the subphylum Crustacea, and is hence related to crabs and lobsters. Barnacles are exclusively marine, and tend to live in shallow and tidal waters, typically in erosive settings. Typical acorn barnacles develop six hard calcareous plates to surround and protect their bodies. For the rest of their lives, they are cemented to the substrate, using their feathery legs (cirri) to capture plankton. They have four active swimming larval stages.

enter image description here

Free-living barnacles are attached to the substratum by cement glands that form the base of the first pair of antennae; in effect, the animal is fixed upside down by means of its forehead.

enter image description here

Since the intertidal zone periodically desiccates, barnacles are well adapted against water loss. Their calcite shells are impermeable, and they possess two plates which they can slide across their apertures when not feeding.

How could this crustacean be made into a large sea-creature? Given the limited food supply how large could it get?

I like my creatures grounded as it adds that sweet flavour of realism. Details about the necessary adaptations for gigantism and lifestyle are what I'm asking (for those who haven't caught on). They don't have to be crustaceans per se but I am attached to the overall barnacle form. Ideally they'd live near the shoreline to inspire myths and legends.

  • $\begingroup$ "Be made"? Are we talking genetic engineering? Or just evolution? $\endgroup$
    – Spencer
    Oct 10 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Spencer Writing. Being the “god” of the universe in writing I’d be pretty offended if someone said the creatures I made had evolved. (Gimme the credit!) $\endgroup$ Oct 11 at 9:46
  • $\begingroup$ Talking of credit, don't forget the author of your fave answer in the credits of your book/film. $\endgroup$ Oct 11 at 9:57

Photosymbiotic great barnacle.

For reference: regular barnacles.



The barnacles are the only sessile members of crustacea, and the giant barnacle leverages the robust crustacean body plan to outcompete other sessile marine organisms with photosymbionts. As with other photosymbiotic marine organisms (sponges, clams, worms, cnidarians) the giant barnacle has photosymbionts in the tissues of its feeding cirri. It can extend these to become the size of a small tree, shading out other sessile organisms. Sometimes these green hairy arms float along the surface of the water.

The giant barnacle retains the ability to pull in its photosynthesizing cirri if there is bad weather or a predator capable of crunching through the armor of the cirri. They come in surprisingly fast and bring with anything that might be within them - other sessile organisms which have taken root on the arms, or mobile organisms not quick enough to flee the collapsing branches of the cirri. The withdrawal of one feeding structure can cause a chain reaction and huge stretches of these green tentacles suddenly vanish along with whatever was in and on them. Within the shell, the great barnacle still has a beak. It can eat.

The eating process of the great barnacle is sloppy and it is evolved that way. The big ones need protein but not carbon, the carbon being provided by their photosymbionts. Smaller, younger great barnacles living on the sides of their ancestors are more reliant on feeding as they grow and increase their surface area. Clouds of meat bits released by the old ones feed the young ones around them.

Like other large, hardbodied photosynthetic reef builders the great barnacles build reefs. Their robust, centennarian shells serve as the substrates for other organisms - although the towering cirri of the great barnacles give this ecosystem more the feeling of a shady kelp forest than a coral reef. A forest where the "trees" might suddenly get sucked down into a great maw and take you with them. Swim cautiously.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The though of using a symbiont for this never occurred to me even though giant bivalves already do this. The idea of a kelp forest that tries to eat you is pretty neat. Perhaps putting barbs on the cirri would do the trick. Yeah let's go with that. $\endgroup$ Oct 9 at 20:00

Look to sponges and corals:

Physically, something that doesn't move has a very different set of evolutionary pressures on it. You chief factors will be food supply, predation, and parasitism.

  • Mega-barnacles will need a lot more food passing through their filters. Their hunting style may come to look more like a spider or fishing trawler sending out nets to catch fish. Whales can follow microscopic food stuffs, but immobile barnacles can't. You'll need a sustained nutrient-rich current blowing food over these guys, and that will likely be the biggest factor controlling total size.
  • Specialist hunters will be able to come and kill your immobile mega-barnacle at their leisure. Those fishing/filtering fronds may need to be more like killing flails to give your creature active defenses to keep it alive. A toxin-releasing emergency response may also be useful to wipe out more resistant predators. Unfortunately, no barnacle I know of produces poison, but if they fed on a poisonous organism, they could passively acquire toxins. But the bonanza effect of killing a really big food item will make predation on these guy really attractive.
  • If you stick with barnacles, then eventually you'll start running up against the size limits on crustaceans. The largest arthropods ever were 2.5 meters and aquatic, and with a shell, that size could be pushed. In this case, lack of movement might be a benefit to large size. On the upside, barnacles molt inside their outer shells, so when they grow they are protected from harm (by some estimates, up to half of arthropods die during the vulnerable molting stage).
  • Parasites will try to get in and infest your barnacle as it gets bigger and bigger. How you want to handle this is up to you.
  • Very large organisms that can't move are unable to respond to changes in their environment with migration. So size typically means age, and your mega-barnacle may want to retain the ability to shift position. Otherwise, they will be limited in growth due to changing environment.

Exactly how big they can get is somewhat speculative. Based on the size of giant clams, they could easily get to 47 inches in body size (including shell). A sponge the size of a minivan was recently discovered, so this may be your upper practical limit of the completely sessile singular organism. If you start factoring in a large web-like fan, they may be able to spread quite a bit like a large coral. A coral (which is admittedly more of a colonial animal) has gotten to be 22 meters across and 8 meters tall, so it wouldn't be outrageous to have something this big (if it didn't need to move at all).

Given an unlimited supply of food, however, who knows? A barnacle that has developed a very specific niche at the mouth of a river may have a large constant food supply (assuming they tolerate the fresh water - barnacles as a rule can't, but they could evolve to do so). The anchoring behavior would allow it to sit in a strong current without constantly expending effort to stay stationary, and an endless flow of water would assist in having new non-stagnant water as a respiration source.

  • $\begingroup$ it will have to move if it feeds at the mouth of a river, otherwise it will be buried quite quickly. this is why clams and barnacles outcompete sponges in those regions. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Oct 9 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @John Good point; I just can't think of a better place to supply enough food for a big arthropod filter feeder. $\endgroup$
    – DWKraus
    Oct 9 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ @John, if you've got a rocky beach and a long-shore current keeping a delta from forming, a river mouth is a reasonably stable environment. $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    Oct 9 at 18:30

Creatures as big as humpback whales can feed on small food like krill, as long as it is available in sufficiently large amount.

However, considering that you want it fixed on the seafloor, it will not be able to go after its own food. This limit its habitat to area with constant, nutrient rich water current.

My gut feeling is that it could not get much more massive than few 10s of kg, and that those feeding appendices will have to develop some sort of deterrent against predation.


Frame challenge

Food is the limiting factor, so we can see how we can improve this. First of all, we can check where nutrients go. Most of the nutrition is found along coastal waters. This is because the light can still reach most layers, while biological debris used as nutrients can't float out of reach. This seems most important. Maybe food can be gained on deeper floors where light doesn't reach and little life exists, as there's a large amount of accumulated debris of life. The problem is that the barnacle is sessile, so it needs a constant supply and not run out.

To both increase the food amount and prevent the food of running out, the barnacle needs to be in an underwater stream. That way more food passes the barnacle, reducing the problem it faces. If this can be done in a way that it could get as much food as a whale, it could conceivably grow as big (ignoring square cube laws and such). The problem is that it's unlikely many of such areas exist, if any. That means they are unlikely to evolve, as too little viable place is too far apart.

Different biology

To get a more consistent huge barnacle, take the approach of bees and ants. The 'queen' barnacle acts as both the hive and queen. Worker barnacles go around collecting food from a large area. The worker barnacles can remove parasites, protect against predators and in general be sacrificed. If there's a good year, the queen barnacle sets reserves for itself and it's a signal to a few worker barnacles to change into queens, settling down as an attempt to reproduce. Much like queen ants and bees the queen barnacle can hibernate if the area knows times of shortages. It closes up as well as possible, letting the worker barnacles fend to themselves, protecting the queen from highly specific predators/parasites that can pierce the shell for as long as they're able.

The main barnacle can still get some food by itself. During (extreme) low tides it'll close off, seeming like a big rock.

The true size is hard to imagine. Each creature has an optimal size. Not requiring to move and the outer shell can aid in a much bigger size, but likely the creature is fully changed on the inside to sustain much bigger sizes. If both food and the internal structure have been taken care off, it doesn't seem like a stretch to have whale sized barnacles.

  • $\begingroup$ To add to your answer the deep is a place with lots and lots of debris, pretty much everything that dies on the surface falls to the bottom. I like your idea of a eusocial barnacle species. $\endgroup$ Oct 9 at 19:52

Start with the right scaffolding

Sacculina carcini in a crab host

As illustrated in these images, barnacles such as Sacculina carcini can become parasites, creating new structures within a crab host. Your barnacles were adapted by bioweapons specialists to present appropriate HLA antigens and signals such as OX40 to suppress the human immune system. Infected swimmers become reclusive, avoiding quarantine checks, as the barnacle colonizes their skin in gill structures while parasitic dendrils inside the body absorb and replace unnecessary structures such as the neocortex and most reproductive structures. After some modification the swimmers are drawn instinctively, or perhaps by the last of their memories, to the soothing roar of the waves. The barnacles form a massive reproductive structure that is fertilized at a microscopic level in the ocean; after this the hosts will wander the ocean for some time, drawing on stored food reserves as they continually release new larvae. In cases where the density of quorum-sensing hormonal signals is particularly high, the barnacles may anchor their host to a holdfast (thereby becoming sessile per the question). These individuals become specialized to release large numbers of male gametes to improve their overall reproductive success.

Of course, these are not the largest barnacles on record - that distinction is disputed by several later variants that targeted marine mammals.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.