Worldbuilding Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for writers/artists using science, geography and culture to construct imaginary worlds and settings. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
In one-on-one combat, with one combatant using a sword, the other the aforementioned false Death, how effective would a scythe be in combat? What tactics could be utilized with it, and what tactics could be utilized against it?
This does not involve modifying the scythe in any way, and is purely out of the two combatants’ skill with their respective weapons. You can assume that both are well-versed in the usage of their weapon.
They guy with the scythe is toast.
Yes, it does terrible damage when it connects, but the required swing is too long and the weapon too heavy to recover quickly; someone with a properly balanced sword (lighter than a full greatsword), who isn't disabled by sheer bad luck on the first scythe swing will cut the scythe wielder to pieces before they can recover for another swing.
Scythes work very well for their intended purpose: harvesting grain (a sharp scythe wielded by a practiced user can compete closely with a gasoline powered sickle bar mower with similar swath width), but it does this by doing a lot of work on each stroke, not by getting a lot of strokes in. Combat weapons, by contrast, need to generate a lot of strokes because if they don't, the opponent who does will always win.
The answer to this question is, sadly, not so very straight forward. There are so many variables to consider that the answer will always be up for debate. It is never a "yes/no" question, but one of probability and stacking advantages. Someone can always "get lucky" when it comes to fighting, especially when you introduce weapons into the mix.
As such I will give you a tl;dr of my answer. If it's a purpose built War Scythe, then the longer weapon has an advantage, if it's a common farming scythe then you'd be better off using a long stick. Now on to the details.
The first question you have to ask is, "what kind of scythe are they using specifically?"
If the answer is "War Scythe," then the answer I have to give is this:
The advantage will typically go to the person with the longest purpose-built weapon. The War Scythe even has a treaties featuring them.
If you are using an unmodified Farming Scythe then I will say this:
The one using the sword will likely have the advantage because of the design and characteristics of a scythe which I will go over now.
The most glaring flaw with this farming instrument is the protruding handle on the shaft. It is meant to be held and used in the fashion as demonstrated here and in the picture below.
This means that the majority of pole-arm techniques employed could not be used as they require free range of your hands to travel up and down the shaft of the weapon unimpeded. Here is an example using a spear. Notice the constant sliding of the hands around the shaft of the weapon, a common theme with all pole weapons/long-shafted weapons (though perhaps not to the degree of a spear, obviously).
Also note how the scythe is down low to the ground by default, assuming you are holding it proper grip. This leaves you almost totally exposed on one side, a fatal flaw if there ever was one. You also restrict yourself to the 2, 4, and 6 strikes as seen below.
This means one entire side of your body is exposed to attack with no reasonable means to defend that side.
Some things that it does have going for it is that it would be easy to preform sweeps with it, that is hooking the back of someone's legs and tripping them. Also attacks to the legs, in general, would very swift and difficult to avoid.
I could go on, of course, but this article is getting lengthy enough. So my conclusion is this, the purpose-built tool typically wins. In this case the order of likely hood to succeed is as follows War Scythe>Sword>Unmodified Farming Scythe.
Looking around my larger hand tools, I would chose any of them as a weapon over the scythe. It's heavy and awkward....even a flimsy fan rack would have more chance of being effective!
I gave your girl a scythe, bgirljungli. I hope you and she do not mind.
https://www.deviantart.com/bgirljungli/art/girl-holding-staff-29003855
The trick to fighting with a scythe is that you are fighting. It is a staff - use it like one. Scythe vs sword is dumb if all you are going to do is swing the scythe like you are mowing. Quarterstaff vs sword is a whole different deal. A quarterstaff is blunt but it has more reach than a sword, much more leverage, and it more effectively uses both hands of the fighter. And the quarterstaff is quicker: both ends of the quarterstaff are weapons and the attack with one end readies the attack by the other.
It cannot cut, unless your quarterstaff is a scythe. With the staff held close to the blade it can be used as a slashing sword and the point is sharp. The leverage of the staff makes cutting moves possible that would be less effective with a sword. And as pointed out the great reach of the scythe opens the possibility of devastating sweep attacks on an opponent who is backing away.
A scythe optimally used as a weapon would not be used in the same way as scythe as an agricultural tool. It could be an awesome weapon.
A person with a scythe would probably get killed on the battlefield, but it would depend on their skills. I mean, look at Kronos from Greek Mythology. He defeated all of his 11 brothers and sister titans, and almost defeated the gods while wielding a scythe. But, sadly, that's Greek Mythology, not real life. So I would say that it would depend on that person's abilities and skills basically anywhere where people want to kill them.
