I'm looking for some kind of science based way for people in a near future to be able to walk around in an irradiated area without getting any adverse effects, I was specifically looking at using magnets to deflect alpha and beta radiation, would this be plausible and if not would there be any other ways to achieve this goal?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related, but not a duplicate. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2021 at 0:26
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Worth noting that alpha particles aren't a threat unless emitted inside the body. Beta particles are a bigger deal, but can be blocked by metal foil. The biggest problems in terms of walking through irradiated areas are gamma rays and neutron radiation - both of which are ionizing and not subject to deflection by magnetic fields. $\endgroup$
    – jdunlop
    Mar 18, 2021 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ I was going to add this as a comment, but it is too long, so apologies if it is not quite an answer. Ash's answer touches on a secondary effect, i.e., contamination with a radioactive source. If there is a kilogram of radioactive material in front of you, you want protection from the radiation, and these suits, blankets, etc. are great. If you get some of that material on our skin or ingest it, that is something else - and in that situation alpha and beta radiation are significant. The most important thing will be to flush the material from your body. Potassium iodide tablets will prevent (to $\endgroup$
    – F2Andy
    Mar 18, 2021 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ Just as a side-note, using a magnet as a personal shielding device is rather unfeasible. Not only would particle direction and field orientation issues (combine right-hand-rule and the fact that there are no monopoles) make your magnetic protection only work from certain angles, but against particles traveling at light speeds, deflecting them takes a long time. Any magnetic field needs to be really big to deflect radiation on a macro scale and a magnet that's powerful enough to project a field large enough to do that would not only probably be lethal, it'd also very inconvenient to be around $\endgroup$
    – Dragongeek
    Mar 18, 2021 at 14:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You (and many many people with you) seem to still misunderstand the problem with radiation. (especially alpha and a bit beta). It's not the radiation of alpha particles that is actually deadly for most part. -- Alpha particles are stopped by the far majority by your skin, most in the "dead" layers that are replenished anyways. The problem is that you breadth (ultrafine) particles (like cesium 137), and those particles emit radiation themselves, directly in your lungs and other organs. So that is where you need to look. $\endgroup$
    – paul23
    Mar 18, 2021 at 17:38

5 Answers 5


Alpha particle emitters you just need to keep outside of your body for the most part. A respirator to start, for longer times a way to drink without exposure, and after that some way to not get it on your skin and a way to clean up anything you get on you afterwards.

Air blocks alpha radiation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle

Energy loss curve of alpha radiation in air

Beta particles can be blocked by thick materials, or a few mm of aluminium (this can emit bremsstrahlung -- basically gamma radiation from blocking the beta radiation). Multiple cm of less dense materials, like plastic, avoids that.

Gamma radiation is harder to stop. Dense materials are best to block it; this is where lead shielding comes in. As noted above, shielding against beta radiation can produce gamma radiation.

Neutron is also bad. Here you want lots of light atoms, like hydrogen, and you have to worry about the material absorbing the neutrons and becoming radioactive in turn (hydrogen is relatively safe against this). Water can be used to shield against Neutron radiation; or water-rich materials, like concrete, which also offers decent Gamma radiation shielding (en-mass). Note that magnets do nothing with Neutrons. But heavy neutron radiation outside of active nuclear reactors is unlikely.

Finally, you have things like radiation pills -- potassium iodide (KI) pills. Radioactive iodine gets absorbed by your body and concentrated in your thyroid, where it kills you.

By taking a KI pill, your thyroid becomes (over) saturated with iodine, and our bodies biological processes go "no more iodine", and doesn't absorb the radioactive stuff at nearly the same rate.

So if you take it before the radioactive iodine exposure, you get some protection. Afterwards it is too late.

The thing is, those 4 flavors of radiation are very different. An irradiated area, as in an area exposed to radiation, is not a problem; radiation in the past isn't what kills you usually. On the other hand, a radioactive area, where there are substances that emit hard radiation, is a problem. Some kinds of radiation (like neutrons) can make substances radioactive.

Think about what kinds of radioactive substances the area has, which in turn comes from what the source of the radioactive substances is. Also, how bad it is.

Thick clothing that you dispose of (or wash) afterwards, a layer of tin foil, a respirator that filters out dust, and KI pills before exposure; all would reduce the radiation impact. Finally, a sensor to pick up on the harder to shield from radiation (gamma and neutron) so you avoid those areas; radiation falls off in inverse square with distance.

But, to be clear, an area saturated with "decent amounts" of neutron emitting radioactive substances is simply lethal. You'd need a radioactive super-tank with shielding everywhere.

Gamma is the next worse. Here, a full body lead lined suit (including a camera port or some kind of lead-based viewport. Magnets aren't going to help here either, as gamma radiation isn't charged.

Alpha radiation is the stuff a piece of paper, or a few inches of air, or your skin, blocks pretty well. They are heavy and charged (they are high velocity helium nuclei). The danger here is from radioactive dust, where the radioactive particles gets into your body. Magnets would work horribly against this, as its charge/mass ratio is really low.

Note that this is very dangerous -- the fact that paper or skin blocks this radiation doesn't mean that this doesn't kill people really well. Radioactive dust is a big problem, and once inside the body alpha radiation is extremely dangerous.

Beta is charged and light, and magnets could in theory help here, although I doubt in practice. But a few cm of plastic or a thin layer of tin foil (which in turn risks emitting gamma radiation) blocks it pretty well.


Thick clothes.

dickies coveralls

Alpha particles... are relatively heavy, and only travel about an inch in air. Alpha particles can easily be shielded by a single sheet of paper and cannot penetrate the outer dead layer of skin, so they pose no danger when their source is outside the human body.

Beta particles are essentially electrons emitted from the nucleus of a radioactive atom. ... Very energetic beta particles can penetrate up to one-half an inch through skin and into the body. They can be shielded with less than an inch of material, such as plastic...


Alpha and beta particles could be deflected by a magnet. I think if you insist on wearing your skin tight leotard the magnets might be a good choice. You would turn heads for sure. My leotard is not very flattering these past years and so I will borrow my brother's Dickies jumpsuit. Thick cloth can stop those pesky particles. Not sure one mexican wrestling mask is thick enough to protect my face but I have several and will wear them all. You can have a few too.

If there are gamma rays around I will fill my leotard with gold Krugerrands. I have it on underneath the jumpsuit. That would work for you too but would mess up the aesthetics.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Make sure to include a filter mask and goggles in your outfit to avoid getting dust in bad places. And take a thorough shower once you've left the area. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2021 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ Hope you're in good shape — all those Krugerrands are going to weigh you down. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2021 at 14:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Now that you're fully protected against gammas by your gold-filled leotard, you're nice and slow and easy pickings for any mutated bears that happen to be wandering around. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2021 at 16:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RossPresser travel in pairs, and go armed. $\endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Mar 22, 2021 at 17:13

Radiation mitigation outfits & blankets are a thing:


enter image description here

enter image description here

These are made with lead wool filling and can reduce or stop radiation from something radioactive passing through them. Wrap the blankets around the more radioactive debris, or around the thing you want to protect (ie you).

Depending on the decay chain (eg why is the land radioactive? Meltdown? Nuked?) radioactive Iodine 131 may be being created by the decaying elements. If that happens, Potassium Iodide tablets should be taken too.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Potassium Iodide tablets should only be taken acutely since they can cause severe thyroid issues if taken long term. For something you can safely do long term, consider adding certain foods like barley, blueberries, and milk thistle to your diet to aid in naturally purging the heavy metals from your system... since the OP is not clear if this is an irradiated zone or a long term global condition, both should be considered based on the situation. $\endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    Mar 18, 2021 at 15:32

As you can see from the other answers, there isn't a single device that will block all forms of ionizing radiation. A layered multi device strategy would be required.

Alpha and beta radiation (helium nuclei and high energy electrons) are the easiest to deal with. As @Willk states thick clothing will suffice.

Gamma radiation is only stopped by lead, or similarly materials that are composed of large atoms. Lead tends to be easily obtainable is is relatively cheap. As @Ash states, lead wool blankets clothing will help.

Neutrons are shielded by water. During the Apollo moon missions, the astronauts who walked on the moon worn liquid cooling garments like the one pictured below. This produced a "zebra like effect" where the astronauts had warm and cool stripes.

Such garments could be made to reduce the "zebra effect" by having infill tubes and thus providing more coverage to the body. Such a suit, filled with water could shield the body against neutrons.

The trick with all this is the ordering of the layering.

Closest to the body a person would require a neutron shielding water suit filled with water and boric acid. This would then be covered with a lead wool garment to shield against gamma radiation and some neutron radiation. Covering this layer would be thick clothing to shield against alpha and beta radiation.

With some may layers it would be very cumbersome to move around but it could be done.

enter image description here

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ that image is utter bullshit. Neutron radiation is hardly a thing - it decays so fast to electron-proton, Where the proton combines with neutrons to form alpha radiation. You'd have to be close to a particle beam for neutron radiation to be more a problem than beta/alpha/gamma. $\endgroup$
    – paul23
    Mar 18, 2021 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ And then the images themselves: they are very very misleading. Without thicknesses or better explanation it's worth nothing. (Why would we need lead when first trying to block by cadmium and then water - but not when doing the opposite - that's not a thing). The terms are also silly what are "fast neutrons" and "thermal neutrons". $\endgroup$
    – paul23
    Mar 18, 2021 at 17:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @paul23 while I agree with the rest of your criticism, "fast neutrons" and "thermal neutrons" are very much a thing, and they have different absorption properties. So-called neutron moderators can turn fast neutrons into thermal neutrons and are used in most of the nuclear reactors. It is possible to build nuclear reactors without neutron moderator, but those need more fissile-rich fuels and currently are in the minority. $\endgroup$
    – moonwalker
    Mar 18, 2021 at 20:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ From NWSS: "The 3-foot thickness of earth shown (or a 2-foot thickness of concrete) will provide an effective barrier, attenuating (absorbing) about 99.9%, of all gamma rays from fallout." You are not going to be able to walk while carrying a 2 feet thick slabs of concrete around you (or even 10cm thick lead slabs). $\endgroup$
    – vguberinic
    Mar 18, 2021 at 20:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You don't just need "lead" and "water" to block gamma and neutron radiation, you need thick layers of lead and water. 70 cm of water should be sufficient, as should 10 cm of lead. $\endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 18, 2021 at 22:53

As others have noted Alpha and Beta particles can be blocked fairly easily. If you wanted a more flexible material that might be effecting in blocking gamma and neutron radiation as well, may I suggest fungus!

Cladosporium sphaerospermum

There has been some research recently on radiotrophic fungi living in the ruins of the Chernobyl reactors. A study on the ISS looked at blocking radiation using these very fungi and showed promising results: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.16.205534v5

  • $\begingroup$ The fungi might survive there, but do you have any indication that they block radiation? It goes against all I know of physics. $\endgroup$
    – o.m.
    Mar 18, 2021 at 17:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ the fungi are not any better at blocking radiation than a layer of leather. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Mar 18, 2021 at 19:38
  • $\begingroup$ Nice out-of-the-box solution. Looking at the numbers though... ~2.17% reduction of ionizing radiation, apparently due primarily to the melanin content of the material, is not particularly significant. The ~98% that passes through still needs to be dealt with. $\endgroup$
    – Corey
    Mar 18, 2021 at 23:18
  • $\begingroup$ @o.m. Most things block ionizing radiation to a small degree. This fungus (Cladosporium sphaerospermum) does a better job than some other light materials because it has lots of melanin - about 8.6% by mass apparently. The main interest in it is that the lift mass is small since it can be grown in place. $\endgroup$
    – Corey
    Mar 18, 2021 at 23:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .