5
$\begingroup$

I'm back with another creature-design question, and this one's a doozy. This new creature is about the size of a tulip but with a "stem" that's twice as thick. Its head and mouth are fused into a flower-like structure, and it has two false sepals extending from the sides of the neck.

This creature must:

  1. Be at least part worm (not just resemble one)

  2. Be able to photosynthesize

  3. Be able to mimic a flower realistically enough to fool a human without close inspection

  4. Be able to leech nutrients from the soil

  5. Be able to catch and consume prey, either through trickery or by catching prey and swallowing it whole like a snake

  6. Bonus points if you can give this creature tunneling ability and the ability to "sense" and differentiate between nearby life forms!

Is this creature possible, and if so, what kind of creature would it be?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ How strictly are you defining "worm?" There's some potential here for anemones and slugs, but they aren't technically worms. $\endgroup$ Dec 10 '20 at 21:38
  • $\begingroup$ Good enough for me, I'll take it! $\endgroup$
    – Alendyias
    Dec 10 '20 at 21:42
2
$\begingroup$

You are basically asking for a mix of a bobbit worm and a venus flytrap. Curiosly enough, both of them have Venus in their names...

For the bobbit worm:

Eunice aphroditois is a benthic bristle worm of warm marine waters. It lives mainly in the Atlantic Ocean, but can also be found in the Indo-Pacific. It ranges in length from less than 10 cm (4 in) to 3 m (10 ft). Its exoskeleton displays a wide range of colors, from black to purple to metallic. This species is an ambush predator; it hunts by burrowing its whole body in soft sediment on the ocean floor and waiting until its antennae detect prey. It then strikes with its sharp mouthparts. It may also be found among coral reefs.

bobbit worm

For the Venus flytrap

The Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) is a carnivorous plant native to subtropical wetlands on the East Coast of the United States in North Carolina and South Carolina.3 It catches its prey—chiefly insects and arachnids—with a trapping structure formed by the terminal portion of each of the plant's leaves, which is triggered by tiny hairs (called "trigger hairs" or "sensitive hairs") on their inner surfaces.

The Venus flytrap is a small plant whose structure can be described as a rosette of four to seven leaves, which arise from a short subterranean stem that is actually a bulb-like object. Each stem reaches a maximum size of about three to ten centimeters, depending on the time of year; longer leaves with robust traps are usually formed after flowering. Flytraps that have more than seven leaves are colonies formed by rosettes that have divided beneath the ground.

The leaf blade is divided into two regions: a flat, heart-shaped photosynthesis-capable petiole, and a pair of terminal lobes hinged at the midrib, forming the trap which is the true leaf. The upper surface of these lobes contains red anthocyanin pigments and its edges secrete mucilage. The lobes exhibit rapid plant movements, snapping shut when stimulated by prey.

Venus flytrap

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That's actually why I said the creature only had to be part plant-otherwise, it'd be a stretch of the imagination for such a creature to exist. I'm afraid you didn't answer the question though-is my creature possible and if so, what species would it belong too? $\endgroup$
    – Alendyias
    Dec 10 '20 at 18:57
2
$\begingroup$

Anemones are the easiest comparison, as they're already considered somewhat flower-like, and their overarching group (including corals and jellyfish) is known for having symbiotic algae that allows them to photosynthesize. In a lot of the existing cases, the photosynthetic ones are less able to capture prey, but there's nothing preventing this from occuring if conditions favour having both methods of sustenance.

Another option would be some variety of sea slug. The Sacoglossa group are capable of photosynthesizing by keeping the chloroplasts from algae they eat intact, while some nudibranches can do something similar as a defence mechanism with the sting cells of their prey. If it's predatory, it's either omnivorous (since it needs to eat plants in order to take their chloroplasts) or dedicated to eating animals that are themselves symbiotic with algae.

Unfortunately, both of these examples are marine, so they extract nutrients for photosynthesis from the surrounding water rather than from soil. It is worth noting that most carnivorous plants aren't that effective at this either, with their nutrients coming from their prey instead.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, this is very helpful! I assume evolution would be perfectly capable of creating a terrestrial version of either organism with enough time, as it created terrestrial creatures from marine organisms millennia ago.....the hard part might be making it like a worm or figuring out gene transfer/fusion with the algae. $\endgroup$
    – Alendyias
    Dec 11 '20 at 16:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.