As far as I understand, when you fuse deuterium (H-2) and tritium (h-3), you get a helium atom and a spare neutron. Basically alpha-rays? Now alpha rays are easily blocked by matter. You can block alpha rays with just a sheet of paper.

Does this mean that you can safely use a deuterium-tritium fusion engine in atmosphere? Not on the ground obviously, but somewhat higher in the sky.

  • $\begingroup$ The biggest problem is that there's lots of really hot plasma coming out the back end, which can do nasty things to anything it touches. Radiation is a minor problem in comparison. See e.g. Niven's "Known Universe" stories, where the aliens think conquering Earth will be simple because the silly humans have outlawed all weapons. Unfortunately, they do have fusion-powered rocketships :-) $\endgroup$ – jamesqf Jun 13 '15 at 21:58

Radiation (and other)
$\alpha$ particles are $He^4$ which are a nucleus with 2 protons + 2 neutrons. The deuterium / tritium reaction is $ H^2 + H^3 \rightarrow n + He^4 + \gamma $. Meaning this reaction does produce $\alpha$ particles.

Alpha ($\alpha$)
The $\alpha$ particle carries a charge and can be easily directed with electromagnetic fields.

Neutron ($n$)
However, the neutron ignores everything but nuclei. Not all nuclei are created equally in protection against neutrons. Low mass nuclei work much better than high mass ones in protecting you. You want your neutron shielding to contain high amounts of hydrogen (water works great).

Gamma ($\gamma$)
What $\gamma$ rays interact with depends upon their energy, lower energy $\gamma$ interact with $e^{-}$ while higher energy $\gamma$ interact only with nuclei. At $14 - 18 MeV$, fusion $\gamma$ rays are high energy and require atomic nuclei for shielding too. High atomic mass nuclei work slightly better (by weight) than low atomic mass nuclei.

In any case, a fusion powered ship requires substantial amounts of radiation shielding against the $\gamma$ and $n$ radiation. Ships of this sort use something called a Shadow Shield. This shadow shield blocks the $\gamma$ and $n$ radiation and forms a radiation free zone for the inhabitants of the ship. The designers limit the shield size to only provide protection for the crew cabin based upon direct line of sight (no portion of the crew cabin can see the core - the shadow shield blocks the view)

Why Radiation?
When in an atmosphere, radiation flowing away from the reaction, in any other direction than the one protected by the shadow shield, reflects off the atmosphere and irradiates the crew cabin.

This is bad & probably deadly news for the crew.

For the other explanation, I'm going to split fusion reactors into two classes, external core and internal core.

I'm defining external core as reactors as those that perform fusion outside of the material portions of the ship. The fusion occurs in (presumably) an electromagnetic or electrostatic containment system so that most of the reaction radiation does not impinge on the matter portions of the ship. Nuclear Pulse Propulsion falls into this as well as several other designs.

In this context, an internal core reactor is one which performs fusion inside the matter portions of the ship.

Why other stuff?
Some forms of external fusion reactor cannot operate in an atmosphere. Current Era (CE) fusion plants require operating in a vacuum. So the density of the fusion reactants is much lower than that of the atmosphere.

Current Era (CE) Inertial Electrostatic confinement fusion
Current Era (CE) Inertial Electrostatic confinement fusion

What makes this even worse is the atmospheric gases are electrically neutral and not affected by the electromagnetic containment fields used to control the fusion reaction. Therefore, descending into the atmosphere will first pollute the fusion core with fusion "poisons" first damping and then halting the fusion reaction.

This usually leads to the ship crashing to the ground.

This is bad & probably deadly news for the crew.


The biggest problem with using a fusion rocket in the atmosphere is most fusion reactor designs require the reaction to take place in a high vacuum. The air will "quench" the forming plasma, absorb a lot of the energy in ways the designers did not plan for and possibly throw off side reactions that could damage the structure.

If the fusion reaction is an implosion design using lasers or particle beams, the atmosphere will absorb some of all of the incoming energy (especially if the lasers are of a very short wavelength), and the fuel pellet may also be tossed about by air currents and not be at the focal point when the beams converge.

About the only way a fusion rocket would work in atmosphere is if the fusion reaction takes place inside the spacecraft and the energy is used to heat reaction mass in a separate chamber.



The engine would generally be shielded anyway (and alpha radiation is the easiest to stop) so the alpha radiation would be a minor issue.

The lack of pollution is one of the big theoretical advantages that make fusion so attractive.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.