Is living on an Alderson Disk possible? An Alderson Disk is a large CD-like megastructure, with a star in the center. If the disk is thick enough, it could have its own gravity. Also, the star in the center can bob up and down, resulting in an artificial day/night cycle.

Here's an example

What are the limitations set by this world design? Any help is appreciated!

  • $\begingroup$ Megastrustures that literally envelopes a star are extremely unstable, especially the 2D megastructures. Few dysons sheres are believed to be theroetically possible and fewer are believed to be habitable. Planetary megastrustures like orbitals (similar to Halos) are much more feasible for supporting life. $\endgroup$
    – Necessity
    May 26, 2015 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ If the thing is thick enough it might pull inhabitants downward. The area nearest the sun would have inhabitants pulled towards that. And if it has any centrifugal force going that artificial gravity would pull inhabitants outward toward the far edge. The thing will fall apart with that many forces playing on it, no? $\endgroup$
    – Len
    Apr 8, 2021 at 17:44

5 Answers 5


An Alderson Disk suffers from almost all of the same problems that a Niven ring world does and has a couple unique to its configuration.

One problem is that the structure / star configuration is dynamically unstable. If you perturb the disk / toroid (by say a meteor strike), then it will most likely (eventually) hit the star - to the extreme detriment of all disk inhabitants.

Therefore, the disk will require an active control system able to restore the disk (toroid) back to its desired location relative to the star if something perturbs it.

One bit problem the disk has that the ring world doesn't is gravitation. The disk provides no mechanism for keeping things "stuck to the surface".

If you wish to make the disk massive enough to supply its own gravitational field then you end up with a toroid whose cylindrical cross section is that of Earth's in both dimension and composition.

The problem is, we haven't mastered the use of materials able to resist isostacy (returning to a spherical shape) under those conditions. Rather than simply supplying a force to keep people stuck to the toroid's surface, it would supply enough force to collapse the toroid into a (large) ball of matter - much to the dismay of the toroid's inhabitants.

The extremely bad news about this is that you can't magic the problem away with fantastically strong and lightweight materials. You need that mass for its gravitation and it's the combination of mass and gravitation that will collapse your toroid.

Good news
Unlike the ring world concept, if you built a self-gravitating toroid, you wouldn't need to spin it to keep things stuck to the inner surface. This significantly reduces the strength of materials requirements (but doesn't get rid of the problems stated above).

I can't see any way to enable this to work nor can I foresee any unless we fundamentally alter our understanding of the Universe.

But if you have your heart set on the design, just include the fiction changes required to make it work. I think an extremely light weight design with gravity generators would work (until someone shuts off the power). You'll want some fail safes, along with fail safes for your active stabilization system to keep the toroid/disk from contacting the surface of the star.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ From the Wikipedia article: "Close to its surface, the gravity of the disk would closely approximate that of an infinite flat plate, for which gravity is perpendicular to the surface." Do you have some math showing otherwise? $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    May 26, 2015 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ You still need enough mass to generate that gravity. Assuming you want something greater than microgravity you need to collect enough mass to generate that gravity. Assemble that much mass and the body can't maintain a disk shape. $\endgroup$
    – Jim2B
    May 26, 2015 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not arguing that the disk can't self-gravitate, I'm arguing that a disk providing something like Mars and potentially down to the size of Vesta gravity will cause your disk to deform. Eventually forming one or more spheres. $\endgroup$
    – Jim2B
    May 26, 2015 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, ok, I see. It's that same old materials problem with megastructures. $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    May 26, 2015 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Samuel it does also depend on the mass of the disk. $F = G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^2}$, so if the disk's mass is small then humans will likely not be gravitationally attracted to it all that strongly. $\endgroup$
    – ArtOfCode
    May 27, 2015 at 8:07

As a general rule, gravity pulls you to the center of gravity of the most gravitationally influential object for your position. In this instance, it seems like it would be the ring. The center of gravity for the ring is... somewhere in that star. This means your people, unless they have things to brace themselves against, will fall into the star. Given that a habitable zone is usually on the order of ~1 AU for a star like ours, I'm willing to say that this will very likely be the case.

Vsauce did a video on a "flat earth" which has a simulation of a flat earth. It displays the problem with living on any disk-like object; the further from the middle you are, the more gravity pulls you to the center of that disk and less to the ground you're trying to walk on.

If the disk was spinning, it would not change the center-of-gravity for the disk. People would still fall into the middle unless they were at a very specific radius, where the acceleration provided by the disk/star's gravity forces them to essentially orbit the star. If you go too far to the edge or center, you'll fly off of fall in.

The best way to overcome this would require a disk that was much, much thicker than it is wide. Alternatively, your disk would need to be infinite in diameter to allow for equal gravity all along the disk. If you're willing to have a structure of nonuniform density, you could make the habitable zone much more dense (and therefore gravitationally stronger), but this still may not work because of that tricksy center-of-gravity.

What about this "infinite sheet approximation" people keep talking about, claiming that the gravity "close" to the surface would feel normal? Well, that's called the infinite sheet approximation, which is more often used in electromagnetism, but can be used in gravity. It turns out that this approximation is only good as long as the distance between you and the sheet is about 1/5 of the distance between the point below you (on the ring) to the edge of the sheet. So if your ring has a thickness of 1 au, your infinite sheet approximation works for 1/5 AU above the surface in the middle of the ring. If you're 1 m from the edge, the infinite plane approximation only holds to about 1/5 of a meter.

There is also the slight problem of that sun drifting into the side of your disk. Due to the fact that it is surrounded by an equal amount of material in the plane of the disk, it can drift around in that plane as if the disk wasn't there. (It's the 2-d case of gravitational force inside a shell.) This means your sun could very easily run into the inner radius, which I imagine would cause problems.

There are also some problems with tidal forces; the inner radius of your disk will experience more pull from the star than the outside of your disk. Unless the material is strong enough to withstand these forces, the star could rip the disk apart. Of course, the proposed disk is large enough that I think it must be made out of some magic material.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What if the disk was spinning? Could the acceleration of its spin counteract the gravity to the center? $\endgroup$ May 26, 2015 at 19:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You should read the Wikipedia article, apparently "Close to its surface, the gravity of the disk would closely approximate that of an infinite flat plate, for which gravity is perpendicular to the surface." So, unless you had some math showing otherwise, it appears your entire answer is (as are all the others) based on a false assumption. $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    May 26, 2015 at 21:15
  • $\begingroup$ While the sun experiences no gravity from the disk the reverse is not true--if the sun drifts the disk gets an unequal pull and soon hits the star. $\endgroup$ May 26, 2015 at 21:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LorenPechtel No, it's true. As soon as the sun goes off the center of gravity of the ring, the material on one side will pull more strongly, but there will be more material on the other side pulling in the opposite direction. It's the 2-d version for why you do not feel gravity from a hollow ball if you're inside it. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mechanics/sphshell2.html $\endgroup$
    – PipperChip
    May 26, 2015 at 23:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @PipperChip Since people live on the surface, it means the approximation is valid for 2m above the disk to within ten meters from the edge. That means it's valid for an average height human for approximately 100% of the ring. If the ring is the about 6,000km thick the gravity will be Earth normal to within 10 meters from the edge for a normal height human. $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    May 27, 2015 at 2:36

Like Niven's Ringworld, the Alderson disk would have to be made of unreasonably strong materials (the super materials "Scrith" and "General Products" spaceship hulls were made of materials which had the strong nuclear force enhanced.) Outside of science fiction, a super civilization might be able to manipulate neutronium, which is also dense enough to provide gravity for the inhabitants of the disk, assuming the inhabitants were the size of bacteria and comfortable with a surface gravity measured in thousands or millions of g. I suspect that amount of gravitational pull on the equator of the star would pull it apart as well....

The Alderson disk should really be thought of as a sort of thought experiment, rather than a real thing. If you want something like an Alderson disk, perhaps you could follow the example of Forest Bishop, who scaled the Ringworld down to something that could be built from real materials. A Bishop Ring has a radius of 1000km, a width of 500 km and the atmosphere is held in by a combination of centrifical force due to the rotation of the ring, and walls on the edges of the ring that are 200km tall. A system of mirrors reflects sunlight over the walls and onto the surface.

Your "CD world" would use a fusion lantern or a "disco ball" like target for the solar mirror platoon to provide light, and a large disk to provide the surface area. Air and water on the surface would rapidly escape into space unless there was some sort of "roof". Perhaps a huge, transparent cover made of diamond or similarly hard and transparent material could be constructed to cover each side of the disk (giving the term "jewel case" a whole new meaning). The maximum size would depend on the materials used, but Graphine, Fullerines and other materials of that nature would allow you to make structures measuring hundreds or thousands of kilometres in diameter.


One problem is gravity. For people to be pulled down, the disc will have to be very thick. At that level of thickness, one has to make sure that the material but the disc is composed of is strong enough to avoid collapsing on itself. Also, relying on the bobbing of a star for a day/night cycle is very unreliable. Getting it to bob steadily would en difficult. Also, a bobbing sun would contribute to what I will discuss below. Most of all, they would die. This is because the gravitational equation is an inverse square law. If the sun is not perfectly in the center, the gravitational pull will be weaker on one side and stronger on another. This will result in the disk crashing into the sun. One might say that as long as we do not service star, it will be perfectly in the center. This is not the case. No one can perfectly put the star in the center. Even if extremely close, over the eons it would slowly crash into the sun. Even if they could put it perfectly in the center, we must remember that the sun is not static. It is solar flares and their comments and other disturbances all throughout the solar system. These things would cause it to not be perfectly center.

  • $\begingroup$ Can you expand on why you thinking bobbing is unreliable. It seems like it should be nothing more than a simple harmonic oscillator... for the kind of civilization that builds Alderson Disks in their free time. $\endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 26, 2015 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ @CortAmmon I added an edit. $\endgroup$
    – Jimmy360
    May 26, 2015 at 19:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @CortAmmon I would think that the gravitational effects of a bobbing sun could be quite disruptive to the inhabitants of the disk. Best case strong winds, worst case everyone gets crushed by oscillatory acceleration? $\endgroup$ May 26, 2015 at 19:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even if the sun could bob up and down, I can't imagine something as massive as a sun doing it on at a frequency approaching a human day -- I think it would have a much longer period. $\endgroup$
    – Johnny
    May 27, 2015 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Johnny My thoughts exactly. $\endgroup$
    – Jimmy360
    May 27, 2015 at 4:31

You need enough forces to keep the Alderson disk from collapsing in on itself. Let's assume a thickness of 6000 km, with 1000-km walls on either face around the interior rim made of tungsten, which has a melting point of 3695 K, and we'll assume that it has an albedo of 74%, and the sun at the center is just like Earth's. We can safely place the inner rim at .01 AU, but we will need to deal with the gravitational force exerted by the sun. Let's put the walls at 1 km thick, which means that they'd have a total mass of 1.4510^24 kg, and as the mass of the sun is 1.9810^30 kg, the force would equate to 8.5610^25 N. The pressure would be 1.1410^9 Pa, and that is for the walls alone. If we want some semblance of a habitable zone, we would need to have it stretch all the way to 1 AU, and we will assume that the rest of the material has a mean density of 5515 kg/m^3.

The total mass of the structure would be about 4.6110^31 kg, which means that the force of gravity on the walls would be 2.7210^33 N. No known material could support such a force, so you will need to work with something a good lot stronger than anything we know. The material's incredible strength would also create some pretty bizarre gravity. At the inner and outer rim, ignoring the sun's gravity, gravity would be about .560 N/kg, and when you factor in solar gravity, the outer rim's gravity is .566 N/kg, and if you were to stand at the inner rim, you'd fall into the sun. As for the middle of the faces, the gravity is 341 N/mg, which would be impossible to survive in. In between those two extremes, there would definitely be some sort of region where there's just enough gravity, but I've made a lot of assumptions.

An array of mirrors and lenses could be used to make sure that there are regions that get just enough heat and light for life to exist, and have a suitable amount of gravity. But, we would need to bend the laws of physics a good bit for an realistic Alderson disk.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .