3
$\begingroup$

Could a life form that uses superfluids as part of its biology exist?

I've read in places that the issue for life outside of Earth and especially the theorised silicon lifeforms is that the existence of solvents is complicated and depends on the molecule chosen and local pressure and temperature.

This post explains some of the physics of large scale superfluids (which I still have trouble understanding) but would it be possible for a planet that has an atmosphere around 74 bars and 31°C to have CO2 superfluids just… going around? And let's assume the superfluid is able to have a role in the biology of the local lifeforms. Would it be more likely to have it replace water or oxygen? I would assume water, because of it being a liquid and flowing down to oceans and all, but then again if it acts like a gas then it would be breathed and that would make the lifeforms quite… unusual to us, am I correct?

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you willing to claim some unobtanium at your far-away planet which goes superfluid under "normal" temperature and pressure conditions? $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft May 5 at 14:09
  • $\begingroup$ I believe a superfluid gas is far less likely to occur, since it requires particle pairing without condensation. So stick with liquid superfluids $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft May 5 at 14:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd rather not have some kind of made-up substance. But also, as I said, I have a lot of trouble understanding superfluids so gas or liquid ones are beyond my understanding I'm afraid. I was mostly wondering what cool implications it could have for the biology of the creatures. Maybe they could have water-equivalent absorption through their skin or even lung-like organs? $\endgroup$ – Nierninwa May 5 at 14:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Keep in mind that it's really difficult to contain superfluids, as sans friction they can escape thru all sorts of tiny crannies or passageways $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft May 5 at 19:00
4
$\begingroup$

I think you're confusing a superfluid with a supercritical fluid given that your temperature and pressure is basically at the critical point for supercritical co2. These are significantly different states of matter.

Liquid matter will typically go through a phase change when heated or decompressed (boiling). Conversely it will go through a phase change when compressed or cooled (condensation). This is characterized by a dramatic change in density and volume at a constant temperature. When boiling water the temperature stops changing at the boiling point and all extra energy is put into the phase transition of liquid to gas (look into the latent heat of vaporization). This energy will be released when the vapor is condensed. In fact when water freezes (another phase change) it heats up the surrounding environment video demonstrating this. Supercritical fluids do not undergo a phase change, they continuously increase or decrease in volume with changing pressure and/or temperature.

Superfluids are much more bizarre and are closely related to, but not the same as, Bose Einstein condensates. To begin there are basically two kinds of stuff: Bosons and Fermions. Fermions are what we typically call matter, and any two cannot occupy the same quantum state at they same time. This is why negatively charged electrons do not collapse into the positively charged protons of atoms but instead occupy different energy levels. It's also what supports neutron stars against gravational collapse (look into degeneracy pressure). Boson have no such constraint, for example photons, which are Bosons, pass right through each other without colliding. Their phases may interfere resulting in interference patterns and the like, but they can exist happily in the same quantum state. Now, protons, neutrons, and electrons are all fermions BUT, due to symmetry some atoms are actually bosons, such as helium 4 (two protons two neutrons). When supercooled it will condense into a Bose Einstein condensate and become a superfluid. This is not only the source of some superfluids but is also the reason behind low temperature superconductors (look into Cooper pairs and BCS theory). Two electrons pair up to become a boson in a material and all fall into the same lowest energy state. Since they are in the lowest energy state they can no longer give up energy to their environment (i.e. electrical resistance) and the material becomes a superconductor with no resistance.

I know this may not be exactly what you're looking for but I hope it helps to distinguish supercritical from superfluid.

EDIT: (Note this is pretty hand wavy) One way a biological life form could benefit from living in a supercritical environment is that they could evolve to exist over a much larger range of pressures. Since they do not have to worry about their blood boiling like we do when we are in a vacuum they could exist in space as long as they kept their body temperature up. The supercritical fluid inside would still expand in volume the same amount but it wouldn't violently boil, which could allow them to slowly "vent" out. The process could be reversed when returning to a non-vacuum environment. However, if they crossed the phase line between liquid and vapor below the critical point they would experience boiling or sudden condensation, potentially killing them. Here is a phase diagram showing what I mean: phase diagram

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot! Yes, I guess I did mean supercritical! Silly of me!! Don't know how I messed that up… (I guess I should change the title and question…) Also, very cool that they can exist in vacuum, though travelling through space would make it hard to conserve the temperature, right? I mean… you'd have to stay close to a star or you'd freeze up? Also, I'm confused. Can a fluid stay supercritical if you change the pressure? And the graph seems to imply between 10 bar and 300 K and 100 bar and 250 K it'd be all fine… but that can't be right, can it? $\endgroup$ – Nierninwa May 16 at 21:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Nierninwa they would need to regulate their pressure and temp to prevent crossing the phase transition line. Supercritical refers more to the lack of phase transition (boiling or condensation) than it does a specific phase of matter. A supercritical fluid, as the diagram above shows, blurs the line between liquid and gas. It is not a phase in and of itself but rather the lack of a distinction between a liquid and gas phase. So our imaginary species only needs to avoid crossing the line between "triple point" and "critical point". Otherwise they would experience a sudden phase transition. $\endgroup$ – onb May 27 at 6:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.