Someone (let's call him Bob) is playing games with someone else (let's call her Alice). Bob used his shrink ray to reduce Alice in size by about 40% (for the purpose of this question, don't worry about how this was accomplished, or any of the potential physics issues).

He did this while Alice was sleeping, and then moved her.

So... Alice wakes up one morning in an unfamiliar bedroom, 60% of her former size (BTW, that's 60% height, not 60% mass). She is unaware of Bob's shrinking technology, but is predisposed to believe that Bob is pranking her by putting her in a room where everything is larger than normal. (Assume she believes that Bob has the means to accomplish this.)

Eventually, Bob is going to walk in and the jig will be up, but until then...


  • Alice's body metabolism seems to be functioning normally.
  • Alice's senses (sight, hearing, etc.) are not noticeably affected.
  • Alice either doesn't speak, or her voice is not noticeably different.
  • Alice doesn't figure it out from looking at herself.
  • Alice doesn't get up off the bed before Bob arrives.
  • The bedroom is clean and uncluttered (think 'magazine photo').
  • There are no personal effects in evidence.
  • There are no mirrors in the bedroom.
  • There are light fixtures, but no visible bulbs, and no other electronics.
  • There are several pieces of wood furniture (including the bed) and a chair or two.
  • There are no visible clothes except what Alice is wearing.

...so Alice won't figure it out due to e.g. looking closely at something like a power plug (or smart phone) that would be difficult to fake, or noticing that the entire world (not just an immediate space that Bob might "fake") or just too many 'things' are "scaled up".


Will Alice figure out what has really happened before she sees Bob? Is it plausible that she doesn't? If she does figure it out, what gives it away? (Would the change in mass be blatantly obvious, if her muscles are also weaker?)


Alice is of sound body and mostly sound mind (above average naïvete), but for story reasons is not going to be poking around the room before Bob shows up... but this might not be for an hour (i.e. she has more than a few seconds). She will likely sit up, maybe stand, roll over, or curl up, but is not going to start doing calisthenics. She's also not going to take her clothes off. There is a window, but the view is not familiar, nor is there anything near enough to the window to make the shrinking obvious¹. She can closely inspect her clothes and the bed, and can look at other things in the room, but is inclined to believe the clothing could be a trick (coarser fabric, larger than normal thread and such).

(¹ At least, I don't think it would be obvious if all you can see is natural terrain, and that not very close by?)

Parting Thoughts:

Thank you everyone that answered! There are some good gems in here that I will use, however, I have ultimately decided to go with my original plan that she won't immediately figure it out (and have therefore accepted Halfthawed's answer. For my purposes, there are several reasons, including that the story circumstances are such that Alice will be less likely to notice the changes to her own body. I was looking more for some external (probably visual) hint that would give the game away, and no one (myself included) has been able to come up with one. (I'm also going to throw in something that looks "normal size" but isn't as an additional means of distracting Alice from the truth.)

Again, thank you all! This question went over much better than I was honestly expecting and the responses are of very high quality. Y'all deserve your upvotes!

  • $\begingroup$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. $\endgroup$
    – Monty Wild
    Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ Late to the party, and not a full answer, but I suggest the answer is no, Alice won't realise, assuming normal real world except Bob has surprising science. She might realise, "it's just like I've been shrunk', but consider what's more likely (to a sci-fi reader reading about Alice) for a person to believe, a), I've been shrunk, although that's a crazy impossible idea, or b), someone is using clever stage magic tricks on me to make me think I've been shrunk. We see that all the time on TV. ... $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ ... It's very ironic, if Alice was actually shrunk and decides it must be a trick. Slightly less ironic, Alice is the sort of person we see tricked on those magic shows, but, in this case it is simply actually true. And the reader only discovers that at the last second. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 7, 2023 at 22:50

9 Answers 9



Standard Bayesian analysis of the situation will suggest that Bob, rather than somehow violently breaking the vast majority of the laws of physics, has instead decide to play a practical joke by moving Alice while sleeping to a ludicrously accurate scaled-up room. There are objects which don't function well at larger sizes than they do at smaller sizes, so if Alice interacts with them they may cause questions, but since she's not getting out of bed to interact with it, she will assume the mundane explanation. In other words, when you hear hoofbeats, it's probably a horse and not a zebra,

  • $\begingroup$ Right! This is why I'm asking; I'm strongly inclined in this direction, but I'm wondering if I am overlooking anything. Pending anyone coming up with anything to the contrary, I will likely accept this answer. (p.s. don't you mean "...and not someone banging coconuts together"? 😉 ...or would the fact that the sound most people associate with horses actually is coconuts make that too much of a stretch?) $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 19, 2020 at 21:17
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ “Think horses not zebras” is a phrase taught to medical students (nurses+doctors) because what they will see patients presenting is almost always common stuff. The phrase likely predates Monty Python. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 13:26

Alice is an avid user of World-Builder. While the average person might not notice ...

The bed materials would be courser and stiffer than usual.

She will feel colder, especially in her extremities.

Her body mass will be distributed differently, e.g., her breasts would exhibit less sag, etc.

Her hair will be finer thus less stiff, and it will not fall as low as usual.

Breathing will be easier, even though her air passages are smaller, as she has to move a smaller volume of air.

She will feel both stronger and be more nimble. All movements will be noticeably fast.

Though most of these are not terribly noticeable on an individual basis, you brain is tuned for pattern recognition. You would likely get the feel that something is not right pretty quickly even though you may not be able to put your finger on it quickly.

Her world-building prowess will enable her to put the pieces together and realize this is no simple prank.

Muscle strength various proportional to cross-sectional area, so less arm-weight probably does not correspond to whipping her arms around with super speed and strength. i.e, proportionally faster/stronger but only at the 40% level.

However, this reminds me of another subtle square/cube issue. Muscle cells are ultimately limited by the strength of their cell wells - in fact I've read before the limit is actually fairly close to the tear point.

The wall cross-sectional area will follow the square law, but I wonder about the motive force within a muscle cell. I am an engineer, not a biologist - my guess is that the motive force within a muscle cell follows the cube law. But, if it actually depends upon internal fibers, etc. it may follow the square law. In this case muscle strength may not vary as I and others previously assumed.

BTW, animals have cell membranes, not cell wells (like plants).

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Heh. No, Alice is not an avid user of WB.SE. Upvote for Awesome, anyway 😃. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 19, 2020 at 21:53
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ +1 for "Though most of these are not terribly noticeable on an individual basis, you brain is tuned for pattern recognition". Unless were are distracted or focusing on something too strongly, we can usually detect it if someone stands behind us (even without moving or making a sound). The very slight changes in illumination, how lighting is reflected in the room, how ambient sounds are refracted slightly differently.. these are not enough for us to consciously recognize, but are enough for our brain to signal that something's weird. $\endgroup$
    – vsz
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 7:12
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Her weight is 21.6% (0.6^3) of what it was before. I guess her first arm movements would feel like flailing and she would notice immediately. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 8:49
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ While this is right, I think the first intuition would be that she was drugged and is thus feeling off balance/sluggish and can't control her muscles right. - Because if she is apt at physics and world-building she would think about all the impossible feats that shrinking herself would entail (heart muscle size/power, her brain-structure, timing on nerve-signals in her brain, the amount of bacteria in her digestive tract...) $\endgroup$
    – Falco
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 9:29
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @user3819867 When I was a child, I broke my arm. It was in a cast for 6 weeks. When the cast came off, my arm seemed to float up all by itself. This makes your conclusion incredibly reasonable to me---Alice would flail around a bit. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 15:56

Will Alice figure out what has really happened before she sees Bob?

Gravity says she could, but she still won't work it out.

Stuff takes time to fall. We are adjusted by the experience of our entire lives (what age Alice might be I'm too much a gentleman to ask), so we have a very strong instinctive feel for the time it should take for things to e.g. fall from my hands to the floor when I'm standing.

If Alice holds something say one meter up and drops it to the floor she will expect it to take about 0.45 seconds (say half a second).

If Alice is shrunk by 40% then it will actually take about 0.28 seconds to fall.

So she's going to instinctively know that's not right - it's too big to dismiss easily.

Is it plausible that she doesn't ?

If she ignores this effect for a while she might become more adapted to it, but it's a big ask. I think she'll notice.

If she does figure it out, what gives it away ?

Timings of anything depending on gravity will be way off. Throw a ball up, takes too short a time to fall back. Drop something it seems to race at the floor faster than it should. Steam rising from a pot - it's going to seem like it's shooting out faster. Things like that.

But can she figure out she's smaller ?

She is unaware of Bob's shrinking technology, but is predisposed to believe that Bob is pranking her by putting her in a room where everything is larger than normal.

And the answer here is maybe.

Humans tend to let go of the initial idea they had slowly even when real evidence has long before demonstrated they're wrong. Alice starts out believing the room may be larger - well that's a darn sight more reasonable than a shrink-ray, so she'll take a heck of a long time to reach "shrink-ray", maybe never.

If Alice had a physics background, this might be easier, but a physicist would still balk at the shrink-ray option as it's, well, physically not plausible (impossible as far as we know).

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer! Although... it depends on Alice having the presence of mind to think of throwing something. For narrative reasons, I am probably not going to use this in my story, but it's a great general answer. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 14:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Matthew She does not have to deliberately do anything. She could just happen upon it by accident. For example, she drops something she picks up and it seems wrong and she tries it again and starts to wonder. That kind of approach. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ Fair enough. Again, in my particular story I don't think this will happen (for the same reasons Alice isn't moving much anyway), but still a great answer which I upvoted accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 16:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Occam's razor shold lead her to believed she is now in a giant centrifuge (so next test is for Coriolis etc.) or even was transported to a planet with different gravity rather than someone invented a shrink ray. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 9:03

Yes. Alice will feel lighter, or stronger, depending on how you look at it.

Perceived weight (that is, difficulty lifting something) corresponds to strength.

Presuming Bob's shrinking technology doesn't change the fundamental laws of physics, mini-Alice's atoms have to be the same size and mass as before, meaning she has fewer of them.

Mass scales with volume; that is, as the cube of the linear scale.


The strength of muscles scales with their cross-sectional area; that is, as the square of the linear scale.

$$0.6*0.6 = 0.36$$

If mini-Alice continued under the assumption that she hadn't been shrunk, she would find she could lift things that looked $0.36/0.216= 1.6666...$ times as heavy as before. If she could lift a 30 kg weight before being shrunk, she could lift a weight that looked like it was 50 kg (but really weighed just 10.8 kg) just as easily. If she could jump 1m in the air, she could jump a distance that looked like 167 cm to her (but was actually the same 1m as before).

This is the same reason that insects and spiders can lift heavier weights in proportion to their own sizes.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Bob's tech has to alter the basic laws of physics, because chemistry is completely messed up otherwise. How would you select which atoms to discard in a protein and still keep it functional $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ @GaryWalker You could just go for fewer cells.... $\endgroup$
    – Spencer
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 19:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That is the same problem, at a different scale. How does Bob's shrink tech selectively decide which cells to edit out of existence? And even worse, bring them back into existing when she is restored in size. Also, a number of body structures are basically 1 or 2 cells thick, problem for the shrink tech is even harder - rounding error for a 40% reduction would be brutal $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 19:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GaryWalker It's a mess, no matter what. $\endgroup$
    – Spencer
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 19:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ IMO - There only way to do selective editing is to use StarTrek transporter tech with the body edit option. I would not describe that as shrink tech - A quick tummy tuck alternative, though. Not a simple physics altering shrink ray. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 19:53

The snarky answer is that no she does not notice because Alice wakes up, realizes that this is not her room, then proceeds to roll over and get another hour of sleep. This is certainly Bob's doing and he'll explain himself later when he decides to crawl out of bed and draws upon his life-giving coffee.

And now for something less snarky:

When Alice wakes up, she is at 60% of her previous height. If I understand the fun-killing Square-Cube Law correctly, this should mean that she has about 21.6% of her previous mass.

Given the lack of power outlets and visible light bulbs in combination with Bob's nature, it would not be a stretch to Alice to assume that Bob has done something. In fact, the fact that it is not her room at all is the first clue that something is amiss.

As Alice wakes, the blankets are going to feel courser due to her smaller size. However, this also depends on what Bob is using for linens. Bedding with a higher thread count than normal may feel like a regular sheet to her smaller form. As her night clothes have (hopefully) shrunk with her, there is nothing there that gives the game away outright either.

The next clue is the different fit in the bed that Alice has, or the bed itself depending on what kind of bed it is. For a start, she now only has a bit over 1/5 of her previous weight. This means that the bed she is lying in will most likely not feel quite the same as her bed does. This bed will likely seem a lot firmer than she would recall given that her lack of mass would cause less distortion in the mattress.

Now the blankets are light, and maybe with the proportional change in strength, she might notice that the blanket seem lighter, but that will only be really noticeable with a heavier quilt-like blanket. But if Bob has used stock pillows, that is something interesting to note. Standard bed-type pillows only get wider as the bed size increases. Alice will no longer be in proportion to the pillows unless they were custom made for this prank. The pillows will need to be scaled down and recreated to hide this part.

As Alice will not really undertake physical exertion during this period, there is no immediate cause for her to find out that she may have gotten proportionately stronger at her modified height. Even then, she might just put it down to a good night's sleep unless she accidentally breaks something.

Wood grains could be a potential way to tell that something strange is going on. With 40% less height, the rings and grain of the wood around her would seem about 40% bigger. Depending on the composition of the nightstand beside the bed, the grain of its wood might look off, but not necessarily wrong. Wooden floors would fall under this vein as well.

The real question is how well Alice knows Bob in this case. While she is unaware of his Shrink-o-Mat, is she aware of any of his more fantastical inventions otherwise? She does know that he can be a bit of an elaborate prankster, so a scaled-up room is not out of the question and is a logical explanation. But so long as she knows nothing of his paranormal tech, then she would have no reason to suspect being shrunk if a simpler explanation works.

I would think that without considering the shrinking hypothesis in the first place, she would not really look for the cues that would point to it as opposed to dismissing them as Bob being a prankster and messing with her.

  • $\begingroup$ Given that mattress springs are conical, wouldn't the bed feel softer? $\endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 12:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are also foam mattresses. Upvoting because the bit about the bed feeling odd (although because it isn't her bed, this won't be conclusive) is great narrative fodder that I will likely use; thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 14:49

Sound and light will be very different. I would not like to say exactly how the differences will impact, but the optics in Alice's eyes will function differently; her smaller eyes will not gather as much light, and as wavelengths have not changed there may be some chromatic effects. (Edit: there is a difference between a child's eye and a scaled-down adult-s eye -- children have much larger eyes in proportion to their size)

Similarly her ears are now scaled wrongly for the frequencies she is used to hearing. What was a high-pitched note will be deeper, and she can now probably hear dog whistles but at the expense of loss of sensitivity in the normal human range.

Also, as noted by another, square-cube means she is radiating heat much faster and her face will feel very cold. With luck she will not freeze to death, as that would spoil the prank. (And yes, kids do freeze to death where adults don't -- which is why babies must be bundled up warmly).

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ At one point, Alice actually was 60% of her current height - when she was younger. Kids don't usually freeze to death before they hit puberty. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 12:50
  • $\begingroup$ ...and likewise, her perceptions were presumably not radically different back then either. (Although without being able to suddenly switch back to a younger body in real life, it's hard to verify that.) I did explicitly say that her perceptions don't seem affected, so this answer basically contradicts one of my stated assumptions, even if it would otherwise be correct. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 14:46
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @NuclearWang +1 for the note, however, I expect that when Alice was 60% smaller there were some differences in her body plan. Kids have different bodies than adults, they are not exactly scaled down versions of them. $\endgroup$
    – Gnudiff
    Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 18:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NuclearWang children have a higher metabolism, also Adult Alice does not have the same central heating, and has a less favourable shape . No, I don't think she'll freeze in this scenario, but she will be a lot chillier than full-size Alice. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 23, 2020 at 15:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NuclearWang it is not only about freezing. Eyeballs don't grow to scale, adults have around 24mm eyeballs compared to around 17mm of newborns. If you scale down Alice so that she looks the same proportions as full size, she will have extra small eyes, which, I suspect, will affect her vision. As far as I understand, the rods and cones can't be scaled much, there can only be less of them. $\endgroup$
    – Gnudiff
    Commented Mar 29, 2020 at 9:48

Yes, through Deduction and Analysis of the Meta-Game

I will make a key assumption, as to how gifted Alice's reasoning abilities are. Can she deduce from root causes why she is in such a situation? I believe that the answer is yes, because Alice is only pretending to be naive on the surface, and is actually a genius in disguise.

From this knowledge, we have three possible conclusions to this question.

We can come to this conclusion by following the subsequent train of logic below:

  1. Let's assume that although nothing physical seems to be out of place, Alice immediately notices that her surroundings have gotten larger.

  2. The first conclusion that she can come to is that Bob has put her in a larger than life sized room.

  3. We know this from the question explanation:

[Bob] is playing games with [Alice]


She is unaware of Bob's shrinking technology, but is predisposed to believe that Bob is pranking her by putting her in a room where everything is larger than normal.

  1. We must, however, analyze, the reason as to why Bob and Alice are playing the game? Is there a reason as to why Bob must go so far as to make a physics-breaking shrink ray, rather than, as you said, making a room that is just ~66.66% larger than normal?

This is because Bob KNOWS that Alice is faking her Naivety, and must go through extraordinary lengths to trick Alice.

Now that the situation has been clarified, we proceed to our final two (and one hypothetical) situations, a and b:

5.a) This is the most divergent step. It depends on whether Alice knows that Bob knows about her naivety ruse. It may be that the naivety was a ruse meant to be exposed, so that Bob will go to greater lengths to trick her. If Alice knows that Bob has seen through her naivety ruse, then she also knows that Bob knows using a larger-than-life room would naturally not trick her. She would thus know that Bob would not simply use a larger-than-life room.

6.a) If the room is not the problem, then there can only be one issue: herself. Thus, Alice can come to the conclusion that Bob has shrunk her, rather than made a room larger than herself.

5.b) Of course there exists the possibility that Bob knows that Alice's naivety is just a ruse, and he knows that she knows that he knows that she is acting naive. In that case, Bob can do it either way.

6.b) Bob presents himself in 'enlarged form' through some sort of holograph, convincing Alice of his 'Shrink Ray', although in fact, there was no shrink ray all along, the room is just large!, or alternatively, he can use the shrink ray. Both are possibilities, and Alice cannot know which he will do.

5.c) Note that 5.a and 5.b all depend on mind games, and which will happen depends on who has outsmarted who. This state, 5.c, is a moot state, where Alice knows that Bob knows that her Naivety Ruse was all planned, as in that case both sides have a clear idea that both sides have all the information. In that case, they would not be playing this game, as both sides are clear that neither is naive enough to fall for simple tricks. They can just have a mind game in dialogue rather than going through the trouble of making shrink rays or larger-than-life rooms. Thus, we can rule out 5.c) and any subsequent 5.d), 5.e), ad infinitum, because they would simply not play the shrink ray or large room game.

TL;DR: Alice is actually a smart cookie in disguise. Whether Alice can figure out that she has been shrunk depends on if she knows one piece of information: whether Bob knows that she knows he has seen through her ruse.

If she knows Bob has seen through only her naivety, but not that she expected him to see through it, then she can deduce that he would not pull a low-level prank like increasing the size of the room, and instead has shrunk her.

If she knows that Bob knows that she intended for her ruse to be blown, Bob wins, as the odds are against her, and she is lacking information.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Epileptic trees! ...And this is what makes this site fun, because while this is almost ludicrously divorced from anything useful to me (at least, for the story I'm currently writing), who knows who else might be inspired? 😉 $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Matthew I'm sorry for the tangent, I thought it would be fun if we focused on the mind-game portion of your question, haha. After all, why else would Bob go to such ludicrous lengths, even breaking the laws of physics, to trick Alice other than if he knew she was pretending to be naive? $\endgroup$
    – Enthu5ed
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 15:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No worries, like I said, it might be useful to someone, and that's the point of this site, after all. (Note that I didn't downvote!) $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 15:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Matthew, of course :). I was just justifying my epileptic tree, I had too much fun writing it to give up on the theory, after all. $\endgroup$
    – Enthu5ed
    Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 15:24

Halfthawed's answer is right (I upvoted that; don't upvote this) - Alice will not work out she's been shrunk - but only because the question is so unreasonable. "Alice's body seems to be functioning normally" rules out any clues like mass/strength oddities and defeats the otherwise clueful points of Gary Walker; and not getting out of bed takes care of the rest. The room isn't likely big enough for the speed of sound of echoes to come into play; her sense of smell and taste might be affected (molecules are the wrong size) but she's not eating or interacting with much and the environment is unfamiliar anyway. If she's wearing perfume, she might find it odd now. Ambient sound might be the wrong pitch and if there is wind outside that might be a solid clue, but I think that's her best shot. I can't convince myself that light would be all that processed differently by her eyes because any effect I can think of involves her rods and cones, but they are "functioning normally." If she can observe ripples in water, they would definitely look a bit odd at her scale, but there isn't any here.

I suppose it depends on her relationship with Bob; but her first thought would probably be nightmare or delusion. I think she'd be frightened and start to doubt her sanity. By the same token, any normal person would immediately get of bed and start testing their perceptions against each other to see if they were sane or not. But the question rules that out. Now, why she thinks Bob has the resources to build a scaled-up room and why she thinks it's plausible that he would I don't know, but yes that's her next mental stop. Of course if she knows Bob is a god (which, after all, he is) or trickster, she has other avenues to explore, but again, they don't involving staying in bed, unless she's panicking from fear, which she might well be.

Her actions are so constrained by the OP that I don't think we can comment on her state of mind. I personally would start screaming "Bob, WTF!" and then fashion some sort of weapon because Bob's clearly a deranged god, and worse, a cad. She needs better friends.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hmm... I probably should have said "metabolism"; what I meant there is that she isn't e.g. having breathing difficulties, not that she absolutely won't notice anything "odd". As for why she jumps to her first conclusion, a) she believes (not entirely incorrectly) that Bob is loaded, and b) doesn't really understand just how difficult it would be to build an oversized room. $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 22:36
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, if she can notice mass/volume differences in her own body, she'll instantly know something fundamental has changed about reality. She'll panic; he's screwing with her most fundamental perceptions; this is a highly effective form of gaslighting. She might assume she's been drugged. Whatever she comes up with, Bob is getting punched in the nuts when he walks in, because she'll know he did something. $\endgroup$
    – Scott M
    Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 22:41

The period of a pendulum varies with the square root of length. Her arms and legs are pendula and her head is an inverted pendulum. These pendula now have periods $\sqrt{0.6} = 0.77$-times as long as was previously the case. Steps are faster, arm swinging is faster, head lolling is faster. Her hair swings and bobs faster. That her usual learned control loops are mistimed for the new physics will be almost instantly noticed.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .