There is a concern that's been brought up only recently--steel and concrete buildings are environmentally wasteful. In further clarification, they waste away too much greenhouse gases. And considering how many steel-and-concrete skyscrapers currently exist worldwide, that is incredibly damning. Which is why some people are nowadays to the idea of a "plyscraper"--a structure made primarily of cross-laminated timber (CLT), which, unlike steel and concrete, stores carbon dioxide.

However, the focus of this question is the one recurring foe of any high-rise structure--gravity. Draw it too tall, and the force to end all forces would crush the structure down, which is why Shimizu won't be using conventional materials when they build their Mega-City Pyramid.

The shape of a building also plays a factor because of weight distribution. Shimizu was on track with a pyramid shape, as the far wider base makes the overall structure more stable, and most archaeologists can agree that the massive Tower of Babel, if it existed, wouldn't be a tower but a ziggurat, which looks different from a pyramid but still has the same principle.

So in the event of building a ziggurat out of both CLT and bamboo, what is the biggest (in regards to base width and height) that it can be without crushing under the force of gravity?

  • $\begingroup$ Could you tell me what is CLT? $\endgroup$ – Julian Egner Jan 10 at 15:28
  • $\begingroup$ @JulianEgner cross-laminated timber. $\endgroup$ – Starfish Prime Jan 10 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ @JulianEgner I have edited the question to include that acronym after the first reference to what it is. $\endgroup$ – Renan Jan 10 at 16:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnO many wooden buildings nowadays reach over 8 stories tall. Also see my answer ;) $\endgroup$ – Renan Jan 10 at 17:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnO That's some of the most baseless conjecture I've seen in these parts... the Pagoda of Fogong Temple is more than double that height (not including the steeple), was built almost 1000 years ago, and has withstood several earthquakes. $\endgroup$ – Nuclear Wang Jan 10 at 18:17

I did some search for the world's largest wooden structures. Some sources point at the Kondo, a.k.a. Great Buddha Hall as the largest one. It's about 18.5 meters tall, and 15.2 meters wide.

Technology made it possible to build bigger wood structures. The Superior Dome in Michigan is 44 meters tall (143 ft) and 163 meters wide (536 ft).

A company named Tamedia has a wooden building that is 50 meters tall (164 ft).

The Brock Common Tallwood House is 53 meters high (174 ft).

But the cake goes to this one:

Tillamook Air Musem Source: https://wandering-through-time-and-place.com/tag/tillamook-air-museum/

This is the Tillamook Air Museum. It was initially a hangar for zeppelins.

Airships! Source: same as above

This structure is 58.5 meters tall (192 ft) and 90 meters wide (296 ft). This is the tallest one I could find.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Constructed by the US Navy in 1942 during World War II for Naval Air Station Tillamook, the hangar building housing the aircraft is 1,072 feet (327 m) long and 296 feet (90 m) wide, giving it over 7 acres (2.8 ha) of area. It stands at 192 feet (59 m) tall. The doors weigh 30 short tons (27 t) each and are 120 feet (37 m) tall. Hangar "B" is one of two that were built on the site originally, Hangar "A" was destroyed by fire in August,1992.[2][3] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tillamook_Air_Museum So it is only 59 meters or 192 feet high, not 326 meters or 1,072 feet. $\endgroup$ – M. A. Golding Jan 11 at 17:15
  • $\begingroup$ @M.A.Golding thanks for the heads up, I've fixed my answer. $\endgroup$ – Renan Jan 11 at 19:20

For state-of-the-art in timber buildings, you can see that a lot of people are talking about (and even planning) plyscrapers that are over 300m tall. The super-tall wooden building industry isn't exactly in its infancy, but there isn't a huge amount of experience out there, and it seems like things can only improve from there.

For a very handwavey maximum, consider the compressive strength of CLT (say, 50MPa) and its density (say, 480kg/m3 for spruce... bamboo will likely be a lot denser) you'd get a simple height limit of ~10.6km. That obviously only applies to a pure CLT column with literally nothing else in it that would make it a building, and simplifies things far too much, doesn't consider the usual serious safety margins and so it probably quite an overestimate. Iit is probably out by an order of magnitude, but not two, as can be seen from already existing and currently planned wooden buildings. Whilst the number itself probably isn't very informative, it does suggest that the materials in question are certainly strong enough for most purposes. If you really wanted me to put a number on it, I'd say 1000m, but it is entirely possible that future advances in wood composites and the use of other materials in the construction could make it larger than that.

There's no real practical limit to the girth of a building; that isn't constrained by gravity so you can go wild and do what you like. It doesn't appear to be necessary at the 300m size. It mostly seems to be important for really, really massive structures such as the X-Seed 4000, a 4000m tall steel construction that would have had to deal with some quite serious environmental challenges that more sensible sized structures don't have to worry about.

I shall point out though that there's nothing about steel that has an intrinsically bad carbon footprint. It can be refined and (re)formed using nuclear or renewable electricity sources and there's obviously quite a lot of it about in existing buildings that can be recycled at some point in the future when those buildings come to the end of their useful life. Composite steel and wood buildings might not tick the bio-eco box, but there's no reason to think they'd be bad.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As far as I can tell, most ziggurats don't have any interior rooms, so just stacking lumber as high as you can go doesn't seem like an unreasonable place to start. $\endgroup$ – Nuclear Wang Jan 10 at 18:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @NuclearWang you could do it that way, but an airier structure will probably be either a) taller, b) more material efficient and probably c) both. I think that there were some internal features in ziggurats, but its been a while since I read anything about them so I could be misremembering. $\endgroup$ – Starfish Prime Jan 10 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ @NuclearWang Ziggurats were usually hollow but they also were usually platforms upon which temples were built. $\endgroup$ – Renan Jan 10 at 18:50

The tallest mostly wooden structure ever built in pre modern times was probably the legendary Yongning Pagoda at Luoyang, capital of the Northern Wei dynasty in northern China.

The Yongning Pagoda was described in Record of the Buddhist Monasteries in Loyang to be 90 Zhang high and 100 Zhang with the spire, or 330 meters (1082.68 feet), but in the commentary of the Waterways Classic "only" 49 Zhang or 163 meters (534.777 feet). Archaeologist Yang Honxun who excavated its foundations believed it was about 147 meters (482.283 feet) tall.

See discussion at: https://historum.com/threads/why-do-ancient-chinese-architecture-hardly-ever-go-up.46370/page-91, page 9, posts 88 and 89.

Note that the Great pyramid is 138.8 meters (455.38 feet) tall and was 146.5 meters (480.643 feet) tall when completed. The facing stones were loosened in an earthquake in 1305 and later carried away, and the pyramidion at the top is missing.

So it is possible, though not certain, that the Yongning Pagoda was taller than the Great Pyramid for a few decades.

It was completed in AD 516 and caught fire in 534, allegedly burning for months. Thus there is little evidence whether it could have stood for centuries or would have soon collapsed.

The tallest Pagoda built in modern times seems to be the pagoda at the Tianning Temple in Changzhou built from 2002 to 2007, which is 153.79 meters or 505 feet tall. But it does have a steel support structure so that doesn't count, I guess.


Renan's answer states that the giant hanger at the Tillmanhook Air Museum, Tillmanhook, Oregon is 326 meters or 1,072 feet tall. However, that is the length and not the height of the hanger:

Constructed by the US Navy in 1942 during World War II for Naval Air Station Tillamook, the hangar building housing the aircraft is 1,072 feet (327 m) long and 296 feet (90 m) wide, giving it over 7 acres (2.8 ha) of area. It stands at 192 feet (59 m) tall. The doors weigh 30 short tons (27 t) each and are 120 feet (37 m) tall. Hangar "B" is one of two that were built on the site originally, Hangar "A" was destroyed by fire in August,1992.2


The much lower actual height of 59 meters or 192 feet is still impressive.

The hanger has lasted for about 78 years since 1942 and it could last for centuries if it never catches fire like its twin did.

The Gliwice Radio Tower in Poland is the tallest existing wooden structure, 118 meters or 387 feet tall, built in 1934.



The Mjostarnet in Brumunddal, Norway, is the tallest wooden building in the world at 85.4 meters or 280.1837 feet tall, completed in 2019.

Mjøstårnet by Voll Arkitekter in Brumunddal, Norway, has been verified as the world's tallest timber building by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.

The 85.4-metre-high tower was built using cross-laminated timber (CLT), a pioneering material that allows architects to build tall buildings from sustainable wood.

It has taken the title of world's tallest timber building from the 53-metre-high Brock Commons Tallwood House in Vancouver, which has a hybrid wood and concrete structure. Treet in Bergen, Norway, which is 49 metres high, used to be the tallest all timber building until Mjøstårnet completed in March 2019.


| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.