I'm working on a story involving humans looking for another habitable planet, and I have been scouring the net for days, finding lots of info on varying levels of oxygen and nitrogen, but none that really answer this question:

Earth's atmosphere is a mix of oxygen, nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide and water vapor; are there other viable possibilities?

For instance, argon -- I know it is inert, which is important, but could it be replaced with another inert gas?

Thank you so much in advance for any info you have on the topic or anywhere you can point me where I might find the answer.

EDIT: Okay, target atmospheric pressure would be, I suppose, in the same realm as what we have on earth? Sorry, for the lame answer, but I am a writer trying to learn science here. I don't need examples of possible atmospheric blends; I'm assuming that is nearly infinite. I'm looking for whether, on a planet on which humans could live outside of pressure suits, etc., the atmosphere might look slightly different to what we have on earth, or should we reasonably expect it to look virtually identical? Thank you!

EDIT 2: Let me boil this down to my real question, I think. If we found an exoplanet that had the exact same gases in its atmosphere (N, O2, Ar, etc.), albeit at slightly different ratios, would we be surprised by that, or would we expect to see that? If you were reading a novel and in it a planet was discovered that fit the above parameters, would you think, no way, what are the odds? Or would you think, yeah, probably?

Thank you for bearing with me on this. I genuinely appreciate the expertise.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your target atmospheric pressure is critically important here. For example, both oxygen and nitrogen (and other "inert" gasses) become dangerously toxic at higher pressures. You should go into a little more detail... the space of all habitable atmosphere is too too large to reasonably explore in a single answer here! $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ We prefer question which can be answered with a measurable answer. Question requesting to compile a (potentially endless) list are not a good fit here $\endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Aug 8, 2019 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ As it stands I cannot see how hard-science applies to what is simply a request for opinions if a broad range of conditions is plausible. The tag has no relevance here, IMO. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 14:30
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, but that's the point -- I don't want an opinion. I would like to know whether it is statistically likely to find exoplanets with virtually identical atmospheres, including with elements like Ar, or is the presence of Ar something more likely to be unique to Earth? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ I wrote an answer if you want there to be more links for further reading tell me. I also could give you a number of examples of very alien, yet plausible atmosphere should you want that. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 15:38

3 Answers 3


Firstly it sounds like you want to do bottom-up worldbuilding, meaning you want to get the basic science straight first. I would recommend worldbuilding YouTuber Artifexian, as he has a series where he starts with constructing the solar system and has currently reached climate mapping. He breaks down the science to a very digestible minimum. For your question, I recommend watching his videos on atmospheres, alien atmospheres and sky and plant-color.


Pressure may vary significantly on "earthlike" planets. Mars has only about 0.006 atm, Earth has 1 atm, Titan has 1.5 atm and Venus 96 atm. Mars and Venus both experienced cataclysmic events in their pasts, the loss of the magnetosphere and a runaway greenhouse effect respectively. Thus they are out of the interesting zone. Looking at Earth and Titan no one could say you went overboard if you vary the pressure on planets you construct by an order of magnitude in both directions (0.1 atm - 10 atm). The upper and lower end might be unsuitable for unsuited humans.


If we found an exoplanet that had the exact same gases in its atmosphere (N, O2, Ar, etc.), albeit at slightly different ratios, would we be surprised by that, or would we expect to see that?

Yes, and No. let me break this down in detail and give you some breathability limits for indefinite survival.

Is somewhat a given since ammonia is common in protoplanetary nebulas and will end up on most planets. As it gets broken apart the nitrogen reacts to N2 molecules, which are very stable and inert. Nitrogen will usually just accumulate over time in the atmosphere.

Free oxygen is only a surprise if you don't expect a biosphere. O2 is so reactive that it will disappear quickly if it doesn't get replenished constantly. O2 may also occur abioticly on worlds where no land is exposed to the atmospere, as nothing can be found to xidise it away with.

  • Ar < 1.6 atm

Nearly all of the argon in the Earth's atmosphere is radiogenic argon-40, derived from the decay of potassium-40 in the Earth's crust. In the universe, argon-36 is by far the most common argon isotope, as it is the most easily produced by stellar nucleosynthesis in supernovas. - Wikipedia

Argon isn't in the atmosphere by chance but as a result of the alpha decay of potassium-40. This means that a planet with no argon in the atmosphere is either very young (not older than maybe 0.5 byr at most), in a low metallicity system (meaning it would most likely be a planet dominated by water), lost its original atmosphere in a geographically speaking recent event or is an artificial world around a gas giant or black hole or is so small (moon-sized) that it had little radioactive material, to begin with. Usually, you will find argon.

  • H2O

You'll usually find out the maximum possible water content by calculating the water vapor saturation pressure. Calculate your planets global average temperature for it and multiply the maximum saturation with 0.125. That's the average water content of the atmosphere. That said this rule of thumb only holds for planets with large bodies of water. Desert-planets might have significantly less moisture.

Carbon dioxide too is a given and will remain in the atmosphere in moderate concentrations as long there is a functioning carbon cycle, which likely requires plate tectonics. A lot of carbon is stored in the lithosphere as rock. If the planet gets too hot it will be "cooked out", which is the reason for Venuses thick CO2 atmosphere

Is usually generated by biological processes, so if there is life, some methane is likely. Abiotic methane is an option, too but you usally wont find it in significant quantities on Earth-like worlds.

  • SO2 < 0.000005 atm

Is a short-lived gas and a sign for extremely strong vulcanism.

A byproduct of having O2 in the atmosphere. Will shield away UV-rays and allow life to colonize the land.

So, no one would be surprised to find very Earth-like atmospheres if the planet in question is very Earth-like. Also finding Mars and Venus-like planets should not surprise anyone, as they show paths along which an Earthlike atmosphere might develope.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for the information, answers and links. This is exactly what I needed. Cheers! $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @thelefthorse Thanks for the accept, yet usually you should wait 48 h before accepting an answer so people in all time zones get a shot at. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 19:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oops, I did not know that. I'll be more cognizant of that in the future, but your answer was exactly the information I needed. Thanks again. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ There's some scope for abiotic oxygen sources. Remember that oxygen needs something to react with in order to stop being $O_2$... on a waterworld, the hydrogen released by photolysis might be lost to Jeans escape, leaving an excess of unreactable oxygen behind, etc etc. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 20:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Anyone else read this in Artifexian's voice after watching the video? Just me? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 21:26

Today, we have examples of some radically different breathing environs. The most unique I know of are breathable liquids, made from specific perfluorochemicals; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing Science-wise, there is nothing preventing a planet from being covered in this stuff, although you’re on your own to figure out a natural process that would produce the stuff in quantity.

But as a proof of concept, this suffices to answer your question.

You should also check out nitrox breathing, an alternative mix of gasses used by deep-sea divers. (In chemistry, nitrox refers to any nitrogen-oxygen blend, including regular air, but among divers, it’s a specialty mix.) At extreme depths, regular air becomes toxic... as would occur on a planet with a very deep atmosphere. These alternate blends are not breathable at the surface but work just fine at depth. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrox

  • $\begingroup$ I've been looking at those, and they are definitely something I will need to study extensively before I can incorporate them. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ Pedantic note: deep-sea divers don't use nitrox, because nitrogen is bad at depth (best avoided below 30m, definitely avoid below 50m). For real deep water stuff, you want trimix (replace some nitrogen with helium) or heliox (replace all the nitrogen with helium). The world of high-pressure gasses gets quite weird and complex, but happily it is outside of the remit of the OP, given their 1-bar requirement ;-) $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ Hm. I went to check my dive training notes. I’ve never dived on alternates, but I think what you’re calling trimix is exactly what one of the divers I was with called nitrox. It seems to be a catch-all term for “not regular air” in at least some circles. Definitely not a specific substance. @StarfishPrime $\endgroup$
    – SRM
    Aug 8, 2019 at 14:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SRM I've only ever heard "nitrox" used to a gas blend primarily consisting of nitrogen and >21% oxygen (and as such it is a range of blends, but with a common properties). Helium blends would never be described as nitrox, because the presence of the helium is the critical component and it gets mentioned front and centre. Confusing the two is extremely bad, and mixing terminology like that is definitely bad practise. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ Beach rats in Caribbean are not known for tech accuracy. I believe he also called a BCD a “floaty”. :-) $\endgroup$
    – SRM
    Aug 8, 2019 at 22:06

It's an interesting consideration that you can have halometanes in the atmosphere: they are not very toxic but already make starting fire difficult at some concentrations.


  • $\begingroup$ Interesting, thanks for the link. Would it be possible to replace all/some percentage of, say, argon, with halomethane? I can live with it being slightly harder to produce combustion at certain elevations. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ I think you should use halomethanes if you have a plot where it would be useful. Otherwise, sure. $\endgroup$
    – alamar
    Aug 8, 2019 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ But could you completely replace argon? Or would you maybe slice into the argon percentage with a small percentage of halomethane? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ I think you can slice into the nitrogen with a percentage of halomethanes. $\endgroup$
    – alamar
    Aug 8, 2019 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh, but hang onto the argon? Thank you so much for answering, btw. So is the argon really key? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2019 at 13:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .