9
$\begingroup$

Right from the beginning, the xenarthrans--armadillos, sloths and anteaters--have been at a disadvantage. For the longest time, their home was an island continent, which made them extremely vulnerable to outside environmental changes. Case in point--the American Interchange caused by the bridging of Panama less than three million years ago. As quoted in Wikipedia:

During the Cenozoic, North America was periodically connected to Eurasia via Beringia, allowing repeated migrations back and forth to unite the faunas of the two continents.[n 21] Eurasia was connected in turn to Africa, which contributed further to the species that made their way to North America.[n 22] South America, on the other hand, was connected only to Antarctica and Australia, two much smaller and less hospitable continents, and only in the early Cenozoic. Moreover, this land connection does not seem to have carried much traffic (apparently no mammals other than marsupials and perhaps a few monotremes ever migrated by this route), particularly in the direction of South America. This means that Northern Hemisphere species arose over a land area roughly six times greater than was available to South American species. North American species were thus products of a larger and more competitive arena,[n 23][69][89][90] where evolution would have proceeded more rapidly. They tended to be more efficient and brainier,[n 24][n 25] generally able to outrun and outwit their South American counterparts, who were products of an evolutionary backwater. These advantages can be clearly seen in the cases of ungulates and their predators, where South American forms were replaced wholesale by the invaders.

Unfortunate in the long term, so how could we toughen them up? Why, give them more space to roam at a far earlier date. (Could put them in ecological crossfire with the rodents and eulipotyphlans, but that's not relevant to the question here.) Fortunately, we have an idea on which directions some particular ocean currents took during the Eocene:

enter image description here

The current was very close to South America at the time, and if we look really closely, we can see that the Panamanian Land Bridge had just started to emerge. Now the question is: Could that current ferry the armadillos and sloths outside of South America to colonize other lands long before the Great American Interchange?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Downvoting without comment on a clear and reasonably detailed question isn't just unhelpful, it is verging on petty. $\endgroup$ – Starfish Prime May 25 at 8:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Could [something] do [something]?" Does it break the rules of logic or the laws of physics? No. So the obvious answer is that, yes, it could. Was it likely? That's an entirely different question... And, as far as we know, it didn't happen. But, quite obviously, it could have happened. $\endgroup$ – AlexP May 25 at 12:59
6
$\begingroup$

While I wish them no disrespect, there are a few mistakes in Bellerophon's answer. First of all - rafting migration most certainly does happen, and has happened many many times in Earth's history. It brought carnivores and tenrecs to Madagascar, histricomorph rodents, monkeys and amphisbaenians to the Americas, and iguanas to the South Pacific. Oceanic dispersal is a very common method of migration.

enter image description here

Furthermore, we know that rafting events out of South America have happened before - examples include:

  • Iguanas, from South America to the South Pacific
  • Amaurobioides spiders, from South America to Africa
  • Monkeys, caviomorphs and many others, from South America to the Caribbean
  • Terror birds (Phorusrhacidae), from South America to Africa

Another error I believe the other answerer has made is the nature of oceanic dispersal. While it can be done by swimming, it seems a more common phenomenon is that organisms are carried aboard large mats of floating vegetation, washed out to sea by rivers - the Amazon commonly belches out such rafts, often of huge sizes. This also solves the food problem - a large raft could easily provide enough vegetation to supply the migrants for a long journey.

If we want to get technical about it, I can do some rough calculations. There's no data on the speed of this Eocene surface current, so I'll just assume that of a typical modern current - nine kilometres per hour, a la the Gulf Stream. Looking at a map of the Eocene world and comparing it to a modern one, I did a rough calculation that the distance from Eocene South America to the easternmost Southeast Asian islands of the time to be about 16,000 kilometres.

It would take 1777 hours, or a bit over 2 months, to traverse 16,000 km at 9 km/h.The field metabolic rate of the three-toed sloth is a measly 38 kilocalories per day, so it'd need 2,812 kilocalories for the whole trip. An average leaf contains roughly 1 kilocalorie for every 5 grams, so there would need to be at least 14 kilograms of leaves on the raft. That is not a stretch of the imagination whatsoever - some vegetation mats are multiton giants.

So, in short, the answer is absolutely yes.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems to be that armadillos and tree sloths (not the ground sloths!) are good candidates for travel by rafting - both are durable and with low metabolic needs. I monkeys can do it these can too. It seems so plausible I wondered why these 2 groups were not at least in the Caribbean. Short answer: they are (or were) and I just did not know. Fun reading! $\endgroup$ – Willk May 25 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ Dailey, Sealboi: check out this great monograph I found - wildlifeservices.org/PDFS/TheOpossum.pdf $\endgroup$ – Willk May 26 at 0:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Willk Too long, didn't read, but the Virginia Opossum arrived to North America during the Interchange, which is not the point of the question. $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey May 26 at 3:07
  • $\begingroup$ How long would it take them to sail from South to North America? $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey May 27 at 22:49
-1
$\begingroup$

Probably not

Firstly as far as I know no land animals have ever colonised somewhere using ocean currents. While this doesn't mean it can't happen it does suggest it would be very unusual.

Another reason to doubt the possibility is that whilee ocean current passes close enough to the top of South America that a passing sloth might wander into the sea and swim into the current the next land it passes near is probably Gibraltar. There is a possibility of the sloth making landfall on some islands in South East Asia but we need the sloths to acess more land than a few islands. This gives a trip of somewhere around 30000 km. The fastest ocean current goes at around 10kmh so its going to take at least a third of a year to make the trip. Sloths have a slow metabolism but I doubt they can go for a third of a year without eating. Armadillos won't fare much better as they can't store much fat they are unlikely to have the reserves to make the journey.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Firstly as far as I know no land animals have ever colonised somewhere using ocean currents." Take a look at this: youtube.com/watch?v=bXueqJfYV9c $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey May 25 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ Oceanic dispersal is a very common method of migration and has occured many times. Furthermore, it needn't be by swimming - most of the time, organisms are carried on mats of vegetation, washed out to sea by flooding rivers. These can be potentially enormous, and also solve the food problem. $\endgroup$ – SealBoi May 25 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ "No land animals have ever colonised somewhere using ocean currents:" oh really? See oceaning dispersal for a primer. $\endgroup$ – AlexP May 25 at 12:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.