1
$\begingroup$

I know steampunk, or rather, steam and coal technology is very limited, needs lots of space, little portability and little energy use.

enter image description here

But nuclear plants use the same thing, the only difference is that instead of coal, they use uranium to heat the water to generate temperatures and absurd pressures that move turbines to generate electricity.

enter image description here

I am aware that radiation is very dangerous and can cause irreparable damage (if you don't die). But WHAT IF a steampunk world didn't find oil to migrate to internal combustion engines and remained in steam and coal until they found uranium?

And well, when the radiation was discovered, numerous radioactive products were put up for sale promising miracles. That radioactive toothpaste promised brighter teeth, for example.

enter image description here

This could open up to many different kinds of alternative worlds. From societies where the poor work near the nuclear power plants and generations are increasingly deformed and disgusting while the rich remain healthy and untouchable.

Or even a noir plot where the transition from coal to uranium has made unprecedented advancement in technology, but big business owners and governments are trying to hide the imminent danger of unsafe uranium use.

enter image description here

Well, the thing is, how much would be needed to move a steam train, for example? Or a steam car? Or even bigger machines?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Mołot, Renan, Gryphon, Philipp, Frostfyre Jan 24 at 14:52

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Worldbuilding, Neto Ananias! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun! $\endgroup$ – Gryphon Jan 24 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ How do you control a nuclear reactor without electronics? $\endgroup$ – L.Dutch Jan 24 at 14:25
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is certainly an interesting idea for a world. But unfortunately there isn't really a well-defined question here. Question&answer sites don't work well for open-ended and discussion-oriented brainstorming questions. Can you try to formulate an objectively answerable question about such a world? $\endgroup$ – Philipp Jan 24 at 14:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Nuclear plants [...] use uranium to heat the water to generate temperatures and absurd pressures": nuclear power plants actually work with steam at lower temperature (and therefore, lower pressure) than coal or gas-powered thermoelectric plants. And nuclear power plants do not produce any increase in radioactivity around them. If you are looking for small nuclear reactors, consider those used on nuclear-powered ships and submarines, or in floating nuclear power stations. $\endgroup$ – AlexP Jan 24 at 15:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I still don't see a focused single-point question here. A lot of interesting background, though. $\endgroup$ – elemtilas Jan 25 at 1:13