I'm currently designing an advanced alien race that has found a way to prevent its host star from dying. But I'm not sure how exactly would that happen.

So my question is, "How could you prevent the death of a star"?

Note: Let's say that they're parent star is similar to ours.

  • $\begingroup$ What kind of star? Different stars finish their life in different ways. $\endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Commented Sep 16, 2018 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ It seems like you're asking us to design it for you. $\endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Commented Sep 16, 2018 at 15:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Required reading: The Last Question by Asimov $\endgroup$
    – Dubukay
    Commented Sep 16, 2018 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate on exactly what kind of technology is at the alien's disposal? Can they create matter out of nothing? What is their propulsion technology like? $\endgroup$
    – John Locke
    Commented Sep 16, 2018 at 15:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If your civilization is sufficiently advanced enough, they may consider star lifting. It won't necessarily save the star, but it would optimize its lifespan so that it would last longer than it would naturally. $\endgroup$
    – TKOW
    Commented Sep 16, 2018 at 16:35

4 Answers 4


Since stars age quicker the larger they are, only way to prevent a star from dying is to remove mass from it, using star lifting. Gases expand when they heat up, including the gas that makes up a star. By focusing strong lasers on a section of the star, you can make that part expand. Then, you collect as much of that gas as you can so it can't fall back into the star.

You would then slowly feed the gas back in at a rate at which the star stops expanding.

You do get less power from a smaller star, but this isn't all bad. If you're doing star lifting, you have control over the star's output. You make it output less if you want it to live longer, or output more if you care more about the energy right now.

This doesn't last forever, eventually, no matter how little gas you feed back in, you WILL run out and the star will die. But you could make that take trillions of years instead of the billions a star would normally get.


To the best of our knowledge, this can't be done

Stars are like batteries. Just as there's nothing to stop a battery in use from draining, there's nothing to stop a star from dying. Excluding rechargeable batteries, any action taken to rejuvenate a dying battery is ultimately destructive to the battery. Stars are no different.

But, let's run with the idea that we could rejuvenate a star for a moment.

Conceptually, there's only two ways to rejuvenate a star.

  1. Add more fuel

  2. Put the energy back

Add more fuel: Using my battery metaphor, adding more fuel makes the battery bigger. All the old "fuel" is still there and can't be removed. For the battery, adding more fuel makes the battery less efficient, but also makes it bigger such that it no longer fits in its application.

From the perspective of a sun, adding more fuel (mostly hydrogen to fuse into heavier elements), means adding more mass. More mass means a greater liklihood of both explosion and collapse (into a black hole). It also changes the orbital dynamics of the entire system (your world may no longer be habitable...). So, it might buy you a little time, but ultimately everything's worse than before.

You could claim that your society is so advanced that it could remove the old battery material to make space for the new battery material. If you can do that, why not just move your planet to a younger system. You'd need to justify why your race is so dedicated to their corner of space that they'd rather bring the mountain to Muhammad, so to speak.

Put the energy back: This is the rechargeable battery concept. Stars fuse mass and the result is energy. You could put the energy back, which (theoretically) reverses the fusion and rejuvenates the star.1 However, just as too much recharging can cause a battery to leak or explode, if this process were actually possible, it would result in a very unstable condition that would likely result in a spectacular explosion.2

More to the point, however, where are you getting the energy in the first place? You'd need to rob the energy of one star to stuff it into yours. We're back to moving the mountain to Muhammad... if you could do that, why not just move your planet to that other star?

The cost exceeds the benefit

Even if you could do either of the above, what time it buys you is debatable. Remember, you're expending energy just to rejuvenate the star (either by moving mass or by injecting energy). The cost to your society will be larger (much larger) than the cost of simply moving to a new star system. Energy isn't free and is never more efficient than 100%, which means the energy put into rejuvenation is greater than the energy you'll get out of the rejuvenation process.

I freely admit that some Clarkean Magic could be applied that makes opening a portal to N-Space or some such to siphon off a ton of energy in some way that wouldn't cause the collapse of reality as we know it today possible. But, you're asking us how that Clarkean Magic would manifest. Beats me. That's fiction so pure and refined that it's intistinguishable from fantasy.

1I'm willing to bet you a milkshake that the physicists on this site, if not rendered incapable of typing at this point due to their laughter, will gleefully explain how what I just explained is a nice concept but entirely nonsense. They'd be correct. Stuffing solar wind back into a star is not the same as stuffing electrons back into a rechargeable battery. "Unfusing" a star would make for good fiction, but not particularly good science fiction.

2A better metaphor would be sticking a small capacitor into your house's electrical outlet. Yes, the capacitor is rechargeable, but the consequence of this experiment is a spectacular explosion. DO NOT DO THIS. You've been warned.


Clearly, they would build a superconducting ring around the star.
Pump electricity through this, and the magnetic field will cause the positive and negative particles in the star to separate. An hour-glass shape will be the result, the superconducting ring will be around the middle.

By reducing the current in the ring they will let some gasses flow back into the center where they will allow nuclear fusion to proceed. But they will allow the fusion to run slowly, thus stretching the life of their star to near infinity (imaginge if you could choose the rate at which the Sun burns its matter).

They would use the fusion to power the ring and their society, and let only so much matter react as they would need for these two usages. The life of the star would stretch from a few billion years to virtual infinity .


The first layer of answers to your question is the one given by Ryan_L: Starlifting. In this, one harvests the hydrogen and helium from outside layers to slow the progress of the star down. Large massive stars burn out faster. Smaller stars last longer.

However, that is just delaying the inevitable. Stars still die. To free ones-self from this, I'd suggest Star Dialysis. You need to remove the heavier atoms from the core of the star, and replace them with fresh hydrogen to fuse. One might acquire this fresh hydrogen from a distant star.

The trick to Star Dialysis is that current theory suggests that there's no much mixing between the core, where the fusion occurs, and the outer convective layers. Heavy atoms tend to hang out in that core and accumulate until the star goes nova and releases them. You're going to need some way to penetrate the core, similar to how a dialysis machine has to be hooked up to your veins and arteries. This is going to be borderline magic, but you're talking about a civilization that's saving stars, so that's okay.

That, of course, is also just delaying the inevitable. You'll run out of hydrogen to consume at some point. How to stop the stars from going out is The Last Question. As Dubukay states in the comments, it should be treated as required reading for any world builder exploring the outer fringes of the lifespan of the stars.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .