I have a region on a planet with identical parameters to Earth but different landmasses that is rather similar to the southern ocean on Earth.

There is a single piece of land around the size of the Pacific Northwest that sticks down into the 50 S latitudes. To the west of it but beneath the 60 S parallel, there is a continent twice the size of Greenland generally extending south and fully glaciated. There is no other land south of the 45th parallel.

I'd like this ocean to generate cyclonic storms stronger than the ones in our own Southern Ocean. Will it already do that or are there any other changes to the distribution of land and water and other things that aren't like orbital distance and mass that I can do to increase the strength of low pressure systems forming in this ocean that will impact the land?

this is a map of Southern Winter temperatures with isotherms for reference

This is a map of southern winter average temperatures for reference.

This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If you want a strong Southern ocean:

  1. Place a single small landmass in the middle. This will help anchor the swirling water so that it doesn't swirl off balance, and get in its own way.
  2. Place a few pointy land masses that angle down any current that drifts northwards. (eg South America, Africa, Australia)
  3. Two or more relatively large heat basins (eg, the Indian and Pacific oceans) that use the sun to cycle large amounts of current that help push the circulation in the southern ocean.

If you don't you'll get the equivalent of the northern ocean.

  1. No central landmass, causing the current to flow into its own path, reducing its own strength.
  2. Many relatively flat landmasses that make a ring, but more importantly are angled to deflect the current away from the pole.
  3. connection to oceans in such a way that the cycle pushes against, or simply pulls current strength from the ocean.

Going off on a tangent it looks like your wanting some extreme climate and variability.

If your after storms, the most violent storm periods in earth (geologically speaking) form when a clean band of ocean forms through the tropics. This causes the warm water to heat year round increasing the frequency/strength of strong weather. It also has the nice effect of caging in the northern/southern oceans own currents concentrating their own strength.

Also be aware that this kind of event tends to throw the oceanic ecosystems into disarray, as cooler water species cannot cross the equator easily, hot water is much less oxygenated and tends to create massive dead zones, and depending on the oceans recent history, it can release copious amounts of green house gases strengthening global warming trends. Needless to say there will be no reliable fishing in such a world.

Take a look at the Gondwana/Lurasia super-continent split for a recent example in earth history.

Conversely if you get a continent or near perfect large continent linking north to south it diverts most ocean currents warming the poles and cooling the tropics, producing an overall more stable climate. You can still get massive storms particularly if you have a giant pacific ocean/indian ocean style where the ocean currents are mostly forced to cycle. Couple that with a giant mountain range relatively close to the coastline, this will trap massive weather events along the coast causing massive amounts of rain, and flooding. While turning the rest of the continent into a relatively barren and unforgiving desert. Take a look at Australia or India for an example.

Also do not forget other events such as volcanism, or world forests for playing hell with the weather.

  • The Siberian Lava Traps are firmly believed to have shifted the climate during the great Permian Extinction. They released so much CO2, Sulfur, and other chemicals, particular small particles that it both cooled and heated the atmosphere on different timescales. This disrupts weather patterns, usually allowing larger storm weather systems to strengthen as relatively strong stable weather patterns are weakened.
  • The Carboniferous Period was so heavily populated by trees, and lacked a good decomposition cycle. This caused an atmosphere relatively devoid of CO2 and very rich in Oxygen, producing a large net difference in static charge. This resulted in powerful lightning storms, and fireballs in the sky, as relatively rich pockets of oxygen were combusted with other atmospheric elements during those lightning strikes.

Given the parameters that you've given, it is very likely that the storms generated in the southern hemisphere would be quite stronger than what exists in our world, and also likely that the South Pole, in the absence of any landmass, might end up being covered by a permanent storm system.

I draw a parallel with the recent discovery on Jupiter's pole, showing a massive storm orbited by smaller storms. While Jupiter isn't Earth-like, the physical laws governing the movement of a fluid, like an atmosphere, are the same no matter what your atmosphere is made of.

Thus, I believe that in your setting, the South Pole would be covered by a giant permanent storm system, fueled and maintained by sea currents, jet streams and the rotation of the planet, that would generate side storm that would wreak havoc on your Greenland and the south shores of the other landmass.

Given how 'thin', so to speak, the two landmasses you described are, this leaves a lot of open seas for storm systems to develop and acquire energy before they make landfall.

  • What you mention about Jupiter's storms is very true, I'm just worried that because cyclones rely on temperature/pressure gradients to strengthen, and if you look at the area near my southern ocean and land, the isotherms aren't all that compact, so I don't know which factor will win out in terms of strength. – Antarctica07 Sep 14 at 13:53
  • I guess that your isotherms are for air temperature, not ocean temperature? You could easily add some temperature to fuel the storms by having a warm oceanic current find it's way to the southern regions. It would carry warm water that would evaporate in contact with the cold air and all this warm moisture would fuel the permanent storm in the South Pole and it's children storms all around. – Sava Sep 14 at 22:58
  • Like the Gulf Stream in NE and Europe? My other concern then would be that the layout of continents would cause a cold current by the SW of my southern continent, inhibiting cyclonogensis. Another problem is storm tracks; if they are funneled to the SE by the Easterlies, then it may be hard for the cyclones that form to hit that coastline. The cyclones that do form would seem to be concentrated below the 60th parallel and with a lower intensity than ours due to the lack of a global polar ice sheet, but that is just my conjecture. – Antarctica07 Sep 15 at 2:13
  • If tehre's a cold current along your southern continent, it would probably be going away from the pole, along the SW coast, thus keeping the continent fully glaciated as it bring cold water and cools the air along the coast. My own conjecture would be that the absence of polar ice sheet would increase the intensity of the storms, and, with a jet stream basically circling the south pole as in our world, the secondary storms would probably be able to strike everything around randomly, with nothing to really guide them towards a particular place. – Sava Sep 15 at 20:33

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.